How many of those years in that tweet were preceded by a steep raising of rates to battle high inflation followed by a 1+ year pause?Ag13 said:This statement simply isn't true. The tweet linked is definitively cherry picking. There have been multiple other rate cut cycles that should be considered when talking about "history". 2001 and 2007 were both cutting into recessions and voila the stock market went down.Heineken-Ashi said:Like I've been saying for a long time, history is not bullish on rate cuts for anything more than a short term relief bounce.TTUArmy said:🔸First Rate Cut - Jan 3, 2001
— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) August 23, 2024
- S&P 500 fell ~39% next 448 days
- Unemployment rose another 2.1%
🔸First Rate Cut - Sep 18, 2007
- S&P 500 fell ~54% next 372 days
- Unemployment rose another 5.3%
🔸First Rate Cut - Sep 18, 2024
- ?
- ? pic.twitter.com/ByaP9mtGq4
If there's another recession following the upcoming rate cuts, then stocks may go down again. But we won't know for a while and as of now the economy has weathered recession signals and continues to grow. If the fed pulls off a soft landing then stocks are likely to continue to go up, not down. Ascribing the stock market's performance to rate cuts themselves doesn't really work.
See below for more info/data:Historically, there are three types of Fed cuts: "panic cuts", "soft cuts", and "hard cuts".
— Mike Zaccardi, CFA, CMT 🍖 (@MikeZaccardi) August 2, 2024
-Panic cuts (e.g., 1987 & 1998) are positive for stocks if the event does not impact Main Street.
-Soft cuts (e.g., 1984, 1995, 2019) are positive for both stocks and bonds.
-Hard cuts… pic.twitter.com/4OwA4FQ0Qc
I've discussed this many many times here. All indications are pointing toward a hard cut due to entering a recession, and maybe something worse, comparable to the years in the past that followed a steep increase in rates.
- I Bleed Maroon (distracted easily by signatures)