Business & Investing
Sponsored by

Houston..we have a problem....

7,281,432 Views | 28678 Replies | Last: 22 hrs ago by TxAg20
aggie028
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What makes you say they aren't committed?
RK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoryF1 said:

It's something that I've heard in the office. I don't know if it's true but Noble doesn't seem too committed to the Basin. It also seems ready for a takeover.


Curious as to why you think that.
jetch17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i would say that APC is ripe to be looking to buy someone out there. I would think it would be a midland based company with delaware focus + Midland Basin assets with the big APC migration and office moving out there.

Someone with a nice office so they dont have to stay in ClayDesta long ... nice green glass buildings?
TxAg20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A $26B taking over a $17B company? That sounds like an awful big bite. I don't have any inside information as to any of this, but I would think APC would be better off buying up smaller guys like CWEI (already acquired by Noble), RSPP, FANG, PE, and the like.
Goose06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TxAg20 said:

A $26B taking over a $17B company? That sounds like an awful big bite. I don't have any inside information as to any of this, but I would think APC would be better off buying up smaller guys like CWEI (already acquired by Noble), RSPP, FANG, PE, and the like.


Agreed, I would look for them to buy someone with more overlapping acreage in Loving/Reeves. WPX or Energen maybe. RSP might fit the bill as well. Cimarex would be an interesting option for APC as they have some overlap in Reeves and that would get APC into the STACK. Or maybe just buying BHP's Delaware acreage.

I'be been thinking Noble would buy Centennial eventually.
jetch17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i know, i have no insight, it just seems with the office move and particulalrly rumbles from APC Houston that a midland delaware co would be in the cross hairs. The COG idea was really just thinking about acreage across the entire basin. Should be interesting to watch.
aggie028
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see APC as the buyout candidate not the buyer. EOG needs to make a run at them. Their position has been horribly mismanaged to date.
NEC1_N6.040
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Enough rumor spreading Rory. Get back to work. You're being watched...
HoustonAg2014
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2.4 Mill Crude draw
500k Gasoline draw
1 Mill Distillate build

At least moving in the right direction. Might be able to pull off seeing 45 today at some point. Don't think it will hold long but kept away from 30s so thats good for now.
Skillet Shot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Boss sock
IrishTxAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Username checks out
NEC1_N6.040
How long do you want to ignore this user?
(message self destructed)
IrishTxAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NEC1_N6.040 said:

Don't worry, not boss. Think of me as big brother trying to help you out.

Muh ha, muh ha ha, muuuh ahh ha ha ha
Damn IT nazis...
HoustonAg2014
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also side note CNBC is about to have the CEO of Cigna on (who is one of the Aggie CEOs) for anyone interested.
DayMan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rory and NEC1 N6.040...

You BOTH better get off Texags and get back to work!!!

The FRACDOG is watching you!

Comeby!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Petengr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NEC1_N6.040 said:

Enough rumor spreading Rory. Get back to work. You're being watched...
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
someone is always watching! Perhaps rory shouldn't have used his real name for a sock.
DripAG08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I see APC purchasing either a private equity group or someone that has acreage that both they and Western can develop together, think $1B - $2B range. They have enough cash on the balance sheet to cover that.

Taking on Noble in this market wouldn't be the best of ideas in my opinion. With debt markets and equities running away, you're talking serious dilution of stock and the ability to raise cash is becoming more and more challenging.
3rdGenAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Changing the subject, does anyone have any insight, good articles, or opinions on what the Aramco IPO does to the market? Good/bad, price increase/decrease, etc.
It seems like there has to be an impact, I just don't know what it will be.
aggie028
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It would seem to me it would give them money to invest and it would put more oil on the market. Who is buying the stock hoping they put on the brakes while others fill the gap and lower the price? I haven read anything about it so my logic may be terribly flawed.
74Ag1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

I don't see how prices can rise too much, since US frackers ramp up production every time they do: SUPPLY

Yep it's a double edge sword. As the price goes up, the Permian, Eagle Ford, etc heats up. Refineries are not equipped as well to refine this light crude so it goes to storage. More goes to storage in the US, the more the negative press. So you can't win... stuck in a loop. Need world wide demand to go up quickly but it won't unless China and India heat up in the next year or so.
The EIA, IEA and OPEC are all wrong when it comes to predicting WW S/D. Probably about 1 mmbpd more is being produced WW then is being consumed. OPEC thinks that S/D will be in balance by year end but they were wrong before (extended cuts to Mar 2018). They will be wrong again, cause US production will increase as it's been going up every time the price/bbl goes up.

It will take until next year for S/D to balance IMO. Oil will stay at 45-50/bbl until then.
UNLESS OPEC and Russia takes another million bbls off the mkt but they won't.
3rdGenAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, that's my thinking as well, but I have taken a pretty negative and cynical outlook to everything in the last few years.
Just hoping I'm wrong.
Skillet Shot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At what point does one of these oil-dependent governments collapse or start a conflict to increase oil prices? Russia, Venezuela, Saudi, Iraq, etc. With the decreasing income and gov't spending, At some point, the bubble has to pop... the question is when?
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think you're seeing glimpses of that pressure build-up right now with the 'blockade' of Qatar. Saudi is terrified of more populism in the gulf. And rightly so, probably. Their populism will look a bit different in form than ours. I think the unknown right now is whether this is good or bad for production. It could tear apart agreements, but could also lead to war.
Comeby!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Skillet Shot said:

At what point does one of these oil-dependent governments collapse or start a conflict to increase oil prices? Russia, Venezuela, Saudi, Iraq, etc. With the decreasing income and gov't spending, At some point, the bubble has to pop... the question is when?
Its never smart to start a war with a dwindling 'war chest'.
nu awlins ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very interesting quote today. Frank Schallenberger, head of commodity research at LBBW said, "There is selective perception in the market at the moment. Bearish factors like output in Libya or Nigeria result in lower prices, but bullish factors like the really high OPEC commitment are ignored." He fully expects prices to bottom out at $40-$45, before returning to $50 until the end of the year, buoyed by higher demand and continued production cuts by OPEC.
The Original AG 76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nu awlins ag said:

Very interesting quote today. Frank Schallenberger, head of commodity research at LBBW said, "There is selective perception in the market at the moment. Bearish factors like output in Libya or Nigeria result in lower prices, but bullish factors like the really high OPEC commitment are ignored." He fully expects prices to bottom out at $40-$45, before returning to $50 until the end of the year, buoyed by higher demand and continued production cuts by OPEC.
again..nothing about the demand side . until someone addresses the YUGE fly in the ointment none of the crystal ball articles are worth reading. NOTHING except perhaps some real tax reform and a return to healthcare insurance sanity will move the demand needle much. Coupled with the reality of the fake scam called " Chinese market growth" and Europe as anything other than a failed " union" rapidly turning into a giant museum and there just isn't anything on the longest outlook horizon that offers much hope for significant price improvement.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
On demand.....Why the f are we still subsidizing green enrgy?
ClickClack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Original AG 76 said:

nu awlins ag said:

Very interesting quote today. Frank Schallenberger, head of commodity research at LBBW said, "There is selective perception in the market at the moment. Bearish factors like output in Libya or Nigeria result in lower prices, but bullish factors like the really high OPEC commitment are ignored." He fully expects prices to bottom out at $40-$45, before returning to $50 until the end of the year, buoyed by higher demand and continued production cuts by OPEC.
again..nothing about the demand side . until someone addresses the YUGE fly in the ointment none of the crystal ball articles are worth reading. NOTHING except perhaps some real tax reform and a return to healthcare insurance sanity will move the demand needle much. Coupled with the reality of the fake scam called " Chinese market growth" and Europe as anything other than a failed " union" rapidly turning into a giant museum and there just isn't anything on the longest outlook horizon that offers much hope for significant price improvement.


Demand is fairly steady and growing slightly.

I agree about the market perception. I think it overreacted positively initially to first OPEC cuts and now has overreacted the other direction over inventories. It's like the market doesn't understand the factors that actually matter and looking at the bigger picture.

$45-$50 is probably a fair range until the excess inventory is eaten up more. But it's moving in the right direction.
Post removed:
by user
MavsAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Starting to hear rumblings of crews being shut down. Rumor is Continental is shutting down 3 in the Bakken and Halliburton will be idling 2 crews in the DJ.

Anyone heard anything similar?
Fuzzy Dunlop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MavsAg said:

Starting to hear rumblings of crews being shut down. Rumor is Continental is shutting down 3 in the Bakken and Halliburton will be idling 2 crews in the DJ.

Anyone heard anything similar?


Same here as far as the Bakken. I heard yesterday that Continental is releasing three crews. This after they had added two for the year.
Latigo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoupNazi2001 said:

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but we are in the second largest expansion since World War II and oil can't stay above $50. Demand won't get much better than now and will really tank during the next recession. This is primarily an issue of too much supply and less and less oil being used around the world due to major technological changes.


Demand for oil is growing but less is being used? How does that work?
John Francis Donaghy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Latigo said:

SoupNazi2001 said:

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but we are in the second largest expansion since World War II and oil can't stay above $50. Demand won't get much better than now and will really tank during the next recession. This is primarily an issue of too much supply and less and less oil being used around the world due to major technological changes.


Demand for oil is growing but less is being used? How does that work?


I believe he is referring to the current economic expansion, which is not spurring the increased demand for oil that we used to see during such periods. That's the concerning thing. If demand for oil is this flat during a period of global growth, what's going to happen during the next slowdown?
First Page Last Page
Page 425 of 820
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.