***** Official Houston Astros 2026 Season Thread *****

2,493,853 Views | 39131 Replies | Last: 7 min ago by EastCoastAgNc
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're in 2006 of the "admit it's over" phase. That team performed far better than this one. Maybe it's more 2007. Point stands. Going for it this year will crush the future.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
linkdude said:

Now I'm curious who'll get the jump from champs to Single-A ball for us.

Anybody else read that as the Tampa Tampons?
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

We're in 2006 of the "admit it's over" phase. That team performed far better than this one. Maybe it's more 2007. Point stands. Going for it this year will crush the future.
Depends on the specific moves. If we are just taking on salary dumps then maybe not but depends how bad those contracts are and for how long. It's not like we shop for premiere free agents anyway and most of the free agent money we do spend immediately turns into guys we wish we could salary dump like Abreu, CW and Imai
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I get what you're saying, but Abreu wasn't a typical FA. He was an Astro from the beginning and over the last 4 years was absolutely one of the best relievers in all of baseball. His fall this year has been absolutely puzzling.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm referring to the Jose version
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MaxPower said:

I'm referring to the Jose version

Oof. I had completely blocked that out of my Astros history in my brain... I feel like I just experienced some trauma all over again looking at his numbers with us.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr.Bond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
insane we fired click.....
Im looking for Ray Finkle.... and a clean pair of shorts. Im just a very big Finkle fan. This is my Graceland, sir.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr.Bond said:

insane we Crane fired click.....


FIFY
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I feel like Crane is our Jerry Jones.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One of these days I hope we get a 30 for 30 explaining the incredible mental gymnastics it took to go on a run that made Yankees, RedSox, and Dodgers fans weep with jealousy using high end analytics and then decide to fire all the analytics guys and go back to "real old school baseball". You know, the kind of old school baseball where you walk the leadoff hitter with regularity, refuse to hold runners on first base, refuse to return the favor after your guys get plunked
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

One of these days I hope we get a 30 for 30 explaining the incredible mental gymnastics it took to go on a run that made Yankees, RedSox, and Dodgers fans weep with jealousy using high end analytics and then decide to fire all the analytics guys and go back to "real old school baseball". You know, the kind of old school baseball where you walk the leadoff hitter with regularity, refuse to hold runners on first base, refuse to return the favor after your guys get plunked
It's simple actually. Crane is the hero of his own story. Luhnow, Click, Dusty, Hinch, the analytics guys, they are all NPC's to Jim. Hire somebody, fire somebody, it's irrelevant because Jim "mother effin Rambo" Crane is the one man army making the key decisions.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?


linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BCEDAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I truly believe that this week's games against the Angels and Rangers will determine if we are buyers or sellers. If we go 4-2 or 5-1 we'll be buyers. If we go 1-5, 2-4 we'll be sellers.
Go 3-3 we would still be three games under .500 (treading water) with only 49 games left, but if Arlington has a 2-4 week we could still be buyers. This is a critical week for us.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think they've been clear no selling is going to happen. It's just a matter of how much we buy.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

We're in 2006 of the "admit it's over" phase. That team performed far better than this one. Maybe it's more 2007. Point stands. Going for it this year will crush the future.

Maybe. If we went and got Bobby Abreu instead of Huff at the deadline, the 2006 Cards never happen and maybe the Astros make a run. The book has not been written yet. And odds aren't in our favor, but the way you act like it's a lock is kind of silly.
BCEDAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

I think they've been clear no selling is going to happen. It's just a matter of how much we buy.

Which is nuts to me. If we can't get to at least two games under.500 by the end of this week I just don't see how they can think they can be buyers and make moves that will significantly make a positive difference for August and September.
But i hope I'm wrong. Hoping for the best
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I was a dodgers fan, I'd be so over 2017 by now.

You've won 3 titles in 6 seasons now and are the premiere dynasty in baseball. It would be like Georgia fans still crying over the Tua game in 2017.

The Astros are down, the dodgers are at an all time high. If that doesn't make them move on, then nothing will
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BCEDAg said:

Farmer1906 said:

I think they've been clear no selling is going to happen. It's just a matter of how much we buy.

Which is nuts to me. If we can't get to at least two games under.500 by the end of this week I just don't see how they can think they can be buyers and make moves that will significantly make a positive difference for August and September.
But i hope I'm wrong. Hoping for the best

The real problem too is if you wait to deal Pena in the offseason, who is going to give you anything when his only year of control left is likely to be one with no baseball played due to a strike/lockout. You have to make that decision now and rip the bandaid off if you are going to trade him. His value goes down extremely steeply if you wait to the end of the season unless there is some miracle breakthrough in negotiations.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

We're in 2006 of the "admit it's over" phase. That team performed far better than this one. Maybe it's more 2007. Point stands. Going for it this year will crush the future.

Maybe. If we went and got Bobby Abreu instead of Huff at the deadline, the 2006 Cards never happen and maybe the Astros make a run. The book has not been written yet. And odds aren't in our favor, but the way you act like it's a lock is kind of silly.

No, it's because this team is lacking in all of the areas that are required for even a marginally successful run, and we don't have the ammo to fill those needs at the deadline. I've always watched this exact GM screw up two deadlines in a row while depending on this exact coaching that has proven it doesn't have what it takes.

Reality hurts sometimes. But the sooner you face it, the sooner you can get on the right track.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The writing is so clearly on the wall. The Astros will not be sellers. They will land an OF guy who hits .240 with an occasional homer and maybe a reliever sporting a 4+ ERA, which hopefully costs no more than a couple of AAAA/who-cares prospects. They'll claim "strategic" victory like last year, and then proceed to do the same things with it- nothing.

Sorry for the pessimism, but this organization has shown zero baseball IQ to believe anything different.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm just here to watch Dana trade Loperfido a second time.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

Farmer1906 said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

We're in 2006 of the "admit it's over" phase. That team performed far better than this one. Maybe it's more 2007. Point stands. Going for it this year will crush the future.

Maybe. If we went and got Bobby Abreu instead of Huff at the deadline, the 2006 Cards never happen and maybe the Astros make a run. The book has not been written yet. And odds aren't in our favor, but the way you act like it's a lock is kind of silly.

No, it's because this team is lacking in all of the areas that are required for even a marginally successful run, and we don't have the ammo to fill those needs at the deadline. I've always watched this exact GM screw up two deadlines in a row while depending on this exact coaching that has proven it doesn't have what it takes.

Reality hurts sometimes. But the sooner you face it, the sooner you can get on the right track.


You can say that but it doesn't make it true. We have a top 10 offense with plenty of power. We have an ace at the front of the rotation that can carry a game. We have a closer we trust that'll go toe to toe with anyone. Do we have plenty of flaws? Clearly. But it's not binary.
BCEDAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mathguy64 said:

I'm just here to watch Dana trade Loperfido a second time.

And I wouldn't be surprised if he traded Joey to the Blue Jays for Jesus Sanchez.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're plenty spoiled as Astros fans, we haven't seen Mets/Royals level misery and I don't think we are on an unstoppable trajectory there yet. I think the rift on how to avoid a decade of malaise could hinge on the extra playoff spots available now that were not before -- second WC only got introduced in 2012 when we had already sold everything for parts.

You can say it doesn't matter and we won't do anything if we get there, but playoff baseball is dice rolls upon dice rolls. We don't know where our ceiling is, given how thin the margin is between most teams.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mariners did us zero favors losing 3/4 in Arlington
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Outside of a split I think 3-1 Rangers was preferred to anything else. We still control our destiny in the tie breaker whereas we need to be ahead of the Ms.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MaxPower said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

We're in 2006 of the "admit it's over" phase. That team performed far better than this one. Maybe it's more 2007. Point stands. Going for it this year will crush the future.
Depends on the specific moves. If we are just taking on salary dumps then maybe not but depends how bad those contracts are and for how long. It's not like we shop for premiere free agents anyway and most of the free agent money we do spend immediately turns into guys we wish we could salary dump like Abreu, CW and Imai


Isn't that the truth, Hader excepting (who was a premier FA, but at a position where Crane could stomach the cost).
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marvin said:

The writing is so clearly on the wall. The Astros will not be sellers. They will land an OF guy who hits .240 with an occasional homer and maybe a reliever sporting a 4+ ERA, which hopefully costs no more than a couple of AAAA/who-cares prospects. They'll claim "strategic" victory like last year, and then proceed to do the same things with it- nothing.

Sorry for the pessimism, but this organization has shown zero baseball IQ to believe anything different.

This is about what I expect to happen.

I'll say JJ Bleday and Ryan Zaferjahn and it'll cost more than we think but both guys have lots of control.
superaggie73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

Marvin said:

The writing is so clearly on the wall. The Astros will not be sellers. They will land an OF guy who hits .240 with an occasional homer and maybe a reliever sporting a 4+ ERA, which hopefully costs no more than a couple of AAAA/who-cares prospects. They'll claim "strategic" victory like last year, and then proceed to do the same things with it- nothing.

Sorry for the pessimism, but this organization has shown zero baseball IQ to believe anything different.

This is about what I expect to happen.

I'll say JJ Bleday and Ryan Zaferjahn and it'll cost more than we think but both guys have lots of control.


If it costs any more than Descenzo, Whitcomb, or Cole then we are horribly run.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marvin said:

The writing is so clearly on the wall. The Astros will not be sellers. They will land an OF guy who hits .240 with an occasional homer and maybe a reliever sporting a 4+ ERA, which hopefully costs no more than a couple of AAAA/who-cares prospects. They'll claim "strategic" victory like last year, and then proceed to do the same things with it- nothing.

Sorry for the pessimism, but this organization has shown zero baseball IQ to believe anything different.

Get out of my brain man. I generally don't like to be the guy who is just down about everything, but I have come to expect absolutely nothing out of Astros leadership. I fully expect them to make some meaningless trade that changes not much of anything, but gives them the chance to talk about how shrewd Dana and our pitching lab are that they must have seen something they can fix in (insert middle relief pitchers name here) to make the deal worth it for them. And the OF we get will have gawdy stats in some obscure metric that measures how unlucky he has been and we expect him to really break out when he gets to the Ice Box with that inviting short left field to try to pull all the sliders he can't reach into.

This just sucks. We need some swagger back as a team and there is just nobody there to provide it.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damn...I get this team isn't anywhere the juggernaut we've been in the past but reading the last page or so you'd never know this team has been playing better baseball coming off winning 5 of the last 6 while leapfrogging a team in the standings.

Just get in and see what they can do when the craziness of the playoffs starts.
SpaceCityAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bracketing aside our opinions about whether we should buy or sell, if we assume that the team will actually fall somewhere in the range of buying or standing part, I would propose that we should only target bats.

We don't have the assets to make a substantial pitching upgrade and we already have a numbers crunch among the folks we have. Obviously it would strengthen your team to acquire a premier closer/set-up type arm, but that isn't going to happen. I actually think we have plenty of quality middle relief options, so adding one more to the mix doesn't make sense.

I agree that an addition like Bleday makes a lot of sense since it shouldn't carry a heavy price tag, gives you a controllable player, and adds a guy that isn't heavily platoon-dependent. He is a guy you could quickly plug into the 5-hole in front of Walker to lengthen the lineup.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
as expected
First Page Last Page
Page 614 of 1119 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.