Already one error. We have to be close to the league leader right?
Probably not terribly different from putting your defensive SS or C hitting well below the Mendoza line in the 9 spot behind the pitcher. Not exactly a glaring endorsement of your confidence in the hitter, but there was also some logic behind it by potentially putting somebody who could run on base ahead of the top of the order.SpaceCityAg05 said:
While they would never do it, that isn't much different than when pitchers used to bat. They would often be sent to the plate with the instruction to not swing, which made it all the funnier when occasionally a wild pitcher would walk his counterpart instead of obtain the essentially free strikeout.
But yeah, a position player might take it a bit more personally than a pitcher!
Not sure some of our guys could be counted on not to swing if they saw one of those sweet looking sliders in the other batter's box.jkag89 said:Wouldn't it be better to just tell the hitter not to swing the bat and at least possibly still draw a BB?txags92 said:Not really. More of a thought exercise about what the analytics would say if it were a real option.Farmer1906 said:Is this a real question?txags92 said:So that brings up a question. With our proficiency at GIDP, if teams are allowed to intentionally walk hitters, hypothetically, could a team take a ghost out to skip a batter that is more likely to GIDP than to get a hit and RBI? Not sure any skipper would ever be brave enough (or stupid enough based on how it would likely impact the skipped player's mentality) to do it, but I have to think the analytics might suggest it might be the better option with some of our guys at the bottom of the lineup.Marvin said:
Kessinger?! Just play with 8 and take the out. At least it won't cost you a GIDP from that worthless toothpick of a bat.
In errors? No, we are one of the best. But errors are rarely the best way to judge a team's defense.Ags #1 said:
Already one error. We have to be close to the league leader right?
Farmer1906 said:In errors? No, we are one of the best. But errors are rarely the best way to judge a team's defense.Ags #1 said:
Already one error. We have to be close to the league leader right?
Fair point.txags92 said:Not sure some of our guys could be counted on not to swing if they saw one of those sweet looking sliders in the other batter's box.jkag89 said:Wouldn't it be better to just tell the hitter not to swing the bat and at least possibly still draw a BB?txags92 said:Not really. More of a thought exercise about what the analytics would say if it were a real option.Farmer1906 said:Is this a real question?txags92 said:So that brings up a question. With our proficiency at GIDP, if teams are allowed to intentionally walk hitters, hypothetically, could a team take a ghost out to skip a batter that is more likely to GIDP than to get a hit and RBI? Not sure any skipper would ever be brave enough (or stupid enough based on how it would likely impact the skipped player's mentality) to do it, but I have to think the analytics might suggest it might be the better option with some of our guys at the bottom of the lineup.Marvin said:
Kessinger?! Just play with 8 and take the out. At least it won't cost you a GIDP from that worthless toothpick of a bat.
Stick to Algebra!Mathguy64 said:
Heyward is about to get a lot of PT with Chas being out.
Hate to say it but he doesn't have it. His bat looks like he's swinging in water instead of air it's so slow.
I would be playing Gamel every day until Tucker can play in the field.
The A's hitting coach takes the exact opposite approach of the Astros'. They don't swing at anything.Ags #1 said:
24 pitch first for Framber
I'm not watching. Its test day today. What did Jason do? Run into one?The Porkchop Express said:Stick to Algebra!Mathguy64 said:
Heyward is about to get a lot of PT with Chas being out.
Hate to say it but he doesn't have it. His bat looks like he's swinging in water instead of air it's so slow.
I would be playing Gamel every day until Tucker can play in the field.
2 run bombMathguy64 said:I'm not watching. Its test day today. What did Jason do? Run into one?The Porkchop Express said:Stick to Algebra!Mathguy64 said:
Heyward is about to get a lot of PT with Chas being out.
Hate to say it but he doesn't have it. His bat looks like he's swinging in water instead of air it's so slow.
I would be playing Gamel every day until Tucker can play in the field.
Blind squirrel meet nut.The Porkchop Express said:2 run bombMathguy64 said:I'm not watching. Its test day today. What did Jason do? Run into one?The Porkchop Express said:Stick to Algebra!Mathguy64 said:
Heyward is about to get a lot of PT with Chas being out.
Hate to say it but he doesn't have it. His bat looks like he's swinging in water instead of air it's so slow.
I would be playing Gamel every day until Tucker can play in the field.
Ags #1 said:
Good point. Which metrics are?
Wabs said:
How did Yainer not score there?
Pettis apparently wasn't giving him any signal. Cost a run.Twisted Helix said:
I don't know if he would've scored but he didn't help himself rounding second.
I just spilt coffee all over my exams.Marvin said:Wabs said:
How did Yainer not score there?
He slowed down to look over his shoulder after rounding second. Terrible fundamentals, and it cost the Astros with Taqueria Arandas choking away another RISP chance.