***** 2023 Houston Astros Season Thread *****

6,509,528 Views | 114825 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by texasaggie2015
1836er
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The little bit that I listen to Houston sports radio the Rangers are basically never talked about.
Dies Irae
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

Just wanted to say I appreciate the quick support from y'all. I'm kind of a dick on here (and in real life) so I glad y'all can overlook it.


Also terrible taste in wrist watches
gambochaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If maldy must catch, then Yainer plays first, yordan and brantley trade left/dh and abreu sits, and chas is in center

Its truly that simple
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fightin' Texas Aggie and Sam Houston State Bearkat
BadAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearkatag15 said:





Keeper of The Spirits
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What did I miss?
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Decapitated. Whole big thing. We had a funeral for a bird.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texasaggie2015 said:

What did I miss?


Nothing. Farmer posted a video of him exposing himself to the Arlingtonians on their thread after they imploded. They naturally were taken aback. He got banned but the mods took pity after seeing all the pornography we normally post here.

He's got a really small peen by the way.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

texasaggie2015 said:

What did I miss?


Nothing. Farmer posted a video of him exposing himself to the Arlingtonians on their thread after they imploded. They naturally were taken aback. He got banned but the mods took pity after seeing all the pornography we normally post here.

He's got a really small peen by the way.


Guess that's why he admits to being just "kind of" a sick.
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guess I'll have to drag my son to practice baseball after the 3rd inning the rest of the year
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was in and out of service today in the mountains of Colorado. Lost service when it was 3-0, got service back and it was 4-3, then saw final score about an hour ago…. What a win
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bregxit said:

Lonestar_Ag09 said:

Farmer1906 said:

Just wanted to say I appreciate the quick support from y'all. I'm kind of a dick on here (and in real life) so I glad y'all can overlook it.

But you're our dick!
Hmm. Not sure how we explain this to our wives...
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JohnnyTexAg1995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also notice the difference in how we handled a blowout in their home stadium compared to what their little **** heads did. No pumping HRs and walking around the basses. We've been there before and acted like it
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Resource I didn't know existed. Everything seems well ordered...
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Yainer, Chas, & Julks usage stuck out the most.

Also the poor play (war) of Maldy & Abreu. Woof!
OKCAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bregman's WAR is a bit surprising to me, but I think he helps with his glove as much as he does with his bat. So that's accurate.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OKCAg2002 said:

Bregman's WAR is a bit surprising to me, but I think he helps with his glove as much as he does with his bat. So that's accurate.


You're right. It does, but I think breggy is getting slept on a little. Since July 20th (195 PA) he's got a 177 wRC+. He's got an argument for All MLB 3B this season.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Satellite of Love
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I am Chas and the Astros bring back Dusty, I would ask for a trade. Unless the front office guarantees I am an everyday player, why would I want to be benched this much for the positive contributions to the team? Especially when people like Julks and Maldy are suck detriments and they get more playing time.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

The Yainer, Chas, & Julks usage stuck out the most.

Also the poor play (war) of Maldy & Abreu. Woof!
Can those fWAR numbers be interpreted to say that if Yainer had more games played we'd have won about a game more this year?
Bag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
linkdude said:

Resource I didn't know existed. Everything seems well ordered...
is it safe to assume that if diaz had played all year his war would be near 4? Now, take into consideration that Maldi has a -1.1 war and you get a relative war of 5?


redic
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

Farmer1906 said:

The Yainer, Chas, & Julks usage stuck out the most.

Also the poor play (war) of Maldy & Abreu. Woof!
Can those fWAR numbers be interpreted to say that if Yainer had more games played we'd have won about a game more this year?
I don't think that is the intention of WAR even though what you are saying makes sense. Catcher WAR is historically kind of wonky too since it doesn't have the best defensive info built into it. If/When they start using the new Statcast stuff, it'll become much better.
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yesterday was an F You Dusty game. There is absolutely no reason Chas and Yainer should ever be out of this lineup. If Maldy has to catch, then Yainer needs to play 1B or DH. Period. It's clear as ****ing day.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Satellite of Love said:

If I am Chas and the Astros bring back Dusty, I would ask for a trade. Unless the front office guarantees I am an everyday player, why would I want to be benched this much for the positive contributions to the team? Especially when people like Julks and Maldy are suck detriments and they get more playing time.
Unfortunately for Chas, he just sits at the intersection of what an old school manager "feels" like starting CF should look/play like and what modern analysis says he actually is.

The Dusty/Chas rift has been going on for some time now and I don't think I've seen any report definitively stating what the cause is. Just a lot of vagaries about his work ethic or attitude or some other BS like that.

Until I see conclusive evidence otherwise, I think it's pretty clear that Dusty is taking it personally that he was wrong about Chas. For all his strengths as a manager (and he does have strengths), this is by far his biggest weakness. Not knowing when to concede he was wrong.

I think Dusty sat in meetings with the front office a few years ago and talked gushingly about Siri and Straw as guys who have the CF "look". Chas' unorthodox approach at the plate and lack of ability to effortlessly and sexily glide to balls in the OF blinded Dusty to his potential. He's likely doubled and tripled down on Chas never being as good as the front office thought he could be.

Now, every dinger Chas hits. Every additional point he tacks onto his WAR. Every good play he makes in the field. Fuels Dusty's bitterness about being wrong. And he clings to every Chas strike-out or caught stealing as justification for doing what he wanted to do in the first place: put a guy in CF who, in his sole opinion, "looks" like a CF.

In years past, before advanced stats were a wide-spread thing, he could get away with it. He could put his experience and judgment up against anyone who challenged him. Now, he's bitter that nerds can easily trump his wisdom with data that's acceptable to everyone.

Whenever he quotes stats, like how internal projections said Singleton should PH for McCormick against Holmes, I think he's lying out of his ass. It's his way of trying to denigrate a system that has made his "feel" much more obsolete.

Not sure if he was just trolling with the the Julio Rodriguez comment the other day or if he really meant it. I'm pretty sure he meant it. And it just speaks to his bitterness about being wrong blinding him from seeing what's right in front of him. That he has that caliber of CF on his roster.
JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Forget WAR, we need to start Diaz at C with Framber and JV at least once in the regular season in case it becomes a necessity in the postseason. It's basic and simple contingency planning.
BadAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

The Yainer, Chas, & Julks usage stuck out the most.

Also the poor play (war) of Maldy & Abreu. Woof!


McCormick's production extrapolated to same # of ABs as Tucker's (prior to yesterday's game) compares rather favorably.

Feels criminal that he's played 67% of the time.
agdoc2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deluxe said:


For all his strengths as a manager (and he does have strengths)
Agree to disagree
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wabs said:

Yesterday was an F You Dusty game. There is absolutely no reason Chas and Yainer should ever be out of this lineup. If Maldy has to catch, then Yainer needs to play 1B or DH. Period. It's clear as ****ing day.

If?
Lonestar_Ag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Salisbury this morning was discussing our win record at home.

Many on here have stated we have no right to have won 10 or more additional games due to better lineups and keeping guys rolling.

Other division leaders are roughly 40-20 at home this year, were .500, I truly believe this team is we fixed home games and played our best players we could have at least 10 more wins
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
First Page Last Page
Page 2129 of 3281
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.