As of today, Chas McCormick leads MLB in Run Value.
— Ari Alexander (@AriA1exander) August 22, 2023
Basically, Chas McCormick vs. a fastball is the best hitter in baseball.@chazzyfizzz https://t.co/TPwRaha7YG pic.twitter.com/sWSNDlggie
According to statisticalatlas.com Harris county is the 3rd largest county in the country and the 14th most densely populated. I have a feeling most of the fans are coming from Houston. Maybe a large portion of the fans that show up are from the suburbs. I have no idea how many. But it's not from one suburb and it certainly isn't located enough in one direction to build a stadium that isn't centralized.Beau Holder said:
I don't like to be pedantic for its own sake but 10-12K and "no one," which is what you said, are substantively different things as a matter of course. The poster you were responding to was making a point that isn't in disagreement here (and which I don't even think you're really arguing with based on your other post?): simply that central location makes sense and is already achieved in Houston. Whereas moving north was achieving that for Atlanta.
"Ballpark in proximity to homes" = whose homes? The ones who opted to move to Tomball? No thanks.
Dear lord - please give me patience if Diaz and Chaz aren't in the lineup today- I'm stressed enough at work and already constantly sweating because of the heat - please don't make Dusty do this to me today. My heart won't be able to take it anymore. Amen.texasaggie2015 said:
Yeah well Dusty is making it so I'm sure it's going to suck
Farmer1906 said:According to statisticalatlas.com Harris county is the 3rd largest county in the country and the 14th most densely populated. I have a feeling most of the fans are coming from Houston. Maybe a large portion of the fans that show up are from the suburbs. I have no idea how many. But it's not from one suburb and it certainly isn't located enough in one direction to build a stadium that isn't centralized.Beau Holder said:
I don't like to be pedantic for its own sake but 10-12K and "no one," which is what you said, are substantively different things as a matter of course. The poster you were responding to was making a point that isn't in disagreement here (and which I don't even think you're really arguing with based on your other post?): simply that central location makes sense and is already achieved in Houston. Whereas moving north was achieving that for Atlanta.
"Ballpark in proximity to homes" = whose homes? The ones who opted to move to Tomball? No thanks.
texasaggie2015 said:
I plan to make a trip to Wrigley in April and then San Diego in September
True. I live on the west side of town and I don't mind the 20 minute drive to MMP Downtown. A 45 minute drive to Woodlands would be a different animal and I wouldn't go near as much. Someone living in Pearland only has a 15 minute drive, but Woodlands would be an hour or more for them.Ag_07 said:
Tons of people may not live in downtown proper but plenty of people live in Montrose, Rice Military, Heights, West U, etc etc that are only 10-15 mins from MMP.
I doubt most of those people are going to make the haul out to the suburbs to go watch a game especially on weeknights.
There's plenty of demand from those in earshot of downtown to sustain a downtown stadium.
The first thing someone is going to figure out when proposing a location is proximity to customers.Farmer1906 said:According to statisticalatlas.com Harris county is the 3rd largest county in the country and the 14th most densely populated. I have a feeling most of the fans are coming from Houston. Maybe a large portion of the fans that show up are from the suburbs. I have no idea how many. But it's not from one suburb and it certainly isn't located enough in one direction to build a stadium that isn't centralized.Beau Holder said:
I don't like to be pedantic for its own sake but 10-12K and "no one," which is what you said, are substantively different things as a matter of course. The poster you were responding to was making a point that isn't in disagreement here (and which I don't even think you're really arguing with based on your other post?): simply that central location makes sense and is already achieved in Houston. Whereas moving north was achieving that for Atlanta.
"Ballpark in proximity to homes" = whose homes? The ones who opted to move to Tomball? No thanks.
This is misleading. Chas leads in Run-Value vs a singular pitch. Chas dominates 4 seamers like no other.texasaggie2015 said:As of today, Chas McCormick leads MLB in Run Value.
— Ari Alexander (@AriA1exander) August 22, 2023
Basically, Chas McCormick vs. a fastball is the best hitter in baseball.@chazzyfizzz https://t.co/TPwRaha7YG pic.twitter.com/sWSNDlggie
texasaggie2015 said:
Well we know JV's personal center fielder will be in CF
400K people inside the loop are irrelevant if you just put the stadium in clower distance to 1M-2M.Ag_07 said:
Tons of people may not live in downtown proper but plenty of people live in Montrose, Rice Military, Heights, West U, etc etc that are only 10-15 mins from MMP.
I doubt most of those people are going to make the haul out to the suburbs to go watch a game especially on weeknights.
There's plenty of demand from those in earshot of downtown to sustain a downtown stadium.
Quote:
Let's just get back to the normal content on this thread.
That is interesting. Maybe you do have a point. My slow brain would need to see something visually, like a density map with all the burbs included.AgLA06 said:The first thing someone is going to figure out when proposing a location is proximity to customers.Farmer1906 said:According to statisticalatlas.com Harris county is the 3rd largest county in the country and the 14th most densely populated. I have a feeling most of the fans are coming from Houston. Maybe a large portion of the fans that show up are from the suburbs. I have no idea how many. But it's not from one suburb and it certainly isn't located enough in one direction to build a stadium that isn't centralized.Beau Holder said:
I don't like to be pedantic for its own sake but 10-12K and "no one," which is what you said, are substantively different things as a matter of course. The poster you were responding to was making a point that isn't in disagreement here (and which I don't even think you're really arguing with based on your other post?): simply that central location makes sense and is already achieved in Houston. Whereas moving north was achieving that for Atlanta.
"Ballpark in proximity to homes" = whose homes? The ones who opted to move to Tomball? No thanks.
12K live downtown
only 400k live inside the loop (your 30ish minute total commute to a ballpark during evening traffic).
6.5M + live outside the loop (majority on 3 sides of N, W, S)
That means right now moving a ballpark to the burbs would increase potential customers inside a 30 minute commute by multiples.
Houston could have a minor league ballpark in the Woodlands, in Katy, in addition to Sugarland and still draw well at them and the Astros no problem. If the Astros moved west or north they would sell more tickets purely by having exponentially more potential customers in a 30 minute drive.
Let's just get back to the normal content on this thread.
The Royals have narrowed their choices for a $2 billion ballpark district down to two sites.
— Front Office Sports (@FOS) August 22, 2023
The first is in the East Village, near Downtown Kansas City: pic.twitter.com/DindFV03IN
Ag_07 said:Quote:
Let's just get back to the normal content on this thread.
Fckin Dusty
Maldy sucks
STOP swinging at that shlt Pena
Why does Jose stand so far away from the plate?
Wish Crane wasn't so tight and would open the checkbook
Bagwell is the worst GM ever
No way this team makes the playoffs. They're done
THROW STRIKES, DAMN IT!
That better?
AgLA06 said:400K people inside the loop are irrelevant if you just put the stadium in clower distance to 1M-2M.Ag_07 said:
Tons of people may not live in downtown proper but plenty of people live in Montrose, Rice Military, Heights, West U, etc etc that are only 10-15 mins from MMP.
I doubt most of those people are going to make the haul out to the suburbs to go watch a game especially on weeknights.
There's plenty of demand from those in earshot of downtown to sustain a downtown stadium.
You guys are thinking of personal opinions and not real stats of the city.
I don't think anyone would expect it to be all the way in the suburbs.Jet Black said:
Downtown ballparks are so much better than the ones located in the burbs, like in Arlington. A park in the suburbs doesn't make any sense in a city like Houston. Are people going to drive from clear lake to the woodlands to watch the Astros play? I wouldn't.
Conversely... I live WAY WAY out and having to drive/park in the city is a major turn off for me. If they had a ballpark in Katy, the Woodlands, Cypress, or even Sugarland I'd go to 10x more games.Jet Black said:
I live in the heights and if they moved the park to some suburban hellhole I know I'd go to less games.
Quote:
For how spread out we are it makes sense to have the stadium centrally located.
bearkatag15 said:The Royals have narrowed their choices for a $2 billion ballpark district down to two sites.
— Front Office Sports (@FOS) August 22, 2023
The first is in the East Village, near Downtown Kansas City: pic.twitter.com/DindFV03IN
These renderings of the Royals new stadium look amazing
Dusty sucksMarvin said:Ag_07 said:Quote:
Let's just get back to the normal content on this thread.
Fckin Dusty
Maldy sucks
STOP swinging at that shlt Pena
Why does Jose stand so far away from the plate?
Wish Crane wasn't so tight and would open the checkbook
Bagwell is the worst GM ever
No way this team makes the playoffs. They're done
THROW STRIKES, DAMN IT!
That better?
Sorry, your list was incomplete...
1836er said:Conversely... I live WAY WAY out and having to drive/park in the city is a major turn off for me. If they had a ballpark in Katy, the Woodlands, Cypress, or even Sugarland I'd go to 10x more games.Jet Black said:
I live in the heights and if they moved the park to some suburban hellhole I know I'd go to less games.
Gives me vibes of what people in the 80s thought the future would look like.Beau Holder said:bearkatag15 said:The Royals have narrowed their choices for a $2 billion ballpark district down to two sites.
— Front Office Sports (@FOS) August 22, 2023
The first is in the East Village, near Downtown Kansas City: pic.twitter.com/DindFV03IN
These renderings of the Royals new stadium look amazing
Talmbout
Notwithstanding my affection for the idea of a suburban stadium... this is unfortunately true. If we were laid out more like the Metroplex the equation might be different.Jet Black said:Quote:
For how spread out we are it makes sense to have the stadium centrally located.
This
How we line up for #JVDay.
— Houston Astros (@astros) August 22, 2023
๐: 7:10 PM
๐: Closed
๐บ: @ATTSportsNetSW
๐ป: @SportsTalk790 | Spanish: 93.3 FM pic.twitter.com/uOhWut8MhX