Ball seven chant
What do you boys want for breakfast BBQ ?.....OK Chili.
Then there are two options in my eyes. Yordan bats 4th or he bats 2nd. I would prefer him bat 2nd if Tucker is going to bat 3rd.CoachAg19 said:
Supposedly this was a discussion between Yordan, Tuck, and Dusty where they all agreed that Tuck should stay in the 3-spot. I don't get it at all, but I imagine that they'll switch it up sometime soon. You just HAVE to get Yordan more ABs.
Altuve
Pena
Yordan
Tuck
Bregs
Abreu
Chas
Diaz
Dubon (or Julks)
With no Brantley, this is the ideal lineup IMO. It's been absolutely baffling to me ALL season that, after the success we had with Pena in the 2-spot last year, he's been bounced around the lineup so much. Leave him there for a few weeks behind Altuve, and with Yordan and Tuck behind him, and see what happens. If it isn't working, then you look at Bregs or possibly Chas in that spot if Chas continues to play as well as he has been lately.
Mathguy64 said:Farmer1906 said:Mathguy64 said:
They are selling assets to win a WS. Can't say as I blame them. We did it for JV and it worked. We tried it with Greinke and it was a pole shot from working.
We did do it to win a WS. This guarantees them nothing tho. Padres unloaded to get Snell, Soto, & Hader (all 3 light years better than what Tex just did) and they didn't make a WS last year and don't look like they will this year either.
No. We won the WS because we did it once and didn't win when we did it a second time. We did it to increase our chances to win a WS. That's why you do it. To increase your chances.
Yordan needs to play LF and Yanier needs to DH if Maldy is playing.W said:
as we've discussed...
Julks' falling off a cliff hurt Dana's negotiating hand badly
same for Jake's summer slump
I honestly don't care much what the Rangers do. I am confident if the Astros added another SP and maybe a BP guy they can beat anyone.Farmer1906 said:Mathguy64 said:Farmer1906 said:Mathguy64 said:
They are selling assets to win a WS. Can't say as I blame them. We did it for JV and it worked. We tried it with Greinke and it was a pole shot from working.
We did do it to win a WS. This guarantees them nothing tho. Padres unloaded to get Snell, Soto, & Hader (all 3 light years better than what Tex just did) and they didn't make a WS last year and don't look like they will this year either.
No. We won the WS because we did it once and didn't win when we did it a second time. We did it to increase our chances to win a WS. That's why you do it. To increase your chances.
Sure. I bet the Mets thought they were increasing their chances when they spent 400 M on a roster this year.
I think they're blowing their wad because they overspent on big names so their window isn't going to stay open very long. Now they're doubling down on big trade names. The window maybe opened another inch but it also I probably slamming shut in 2 years.
Beat40 said:Then there are two options in my eyes. Yordan bats 4th or he bats 2nd. I would prefer him bat 2nd if Tucker is going to bat 3rd.CoachAg19 said:
Supposedly this was a discussion between Yordan, Tuck, and Dusty where they all agreed that Tuck should stay in the 3-spot. I don't get it at all, but I imagine that they'll switch it up sometime soon. You just HAVE to get Yordan more ABs.
Altuve
Pena
Yordan
Tuck
Bregs
Abreu
Chas
Diaz
Dubon (or Julks)
With no Brantley, this is the ideal lineup IMO. It's been absolutely baffling to me ALL season that, after the success we had with Pena in the 2-spot last year, he's been bounced around the lineup so much. Leave him there for a few weeks behind Altuve, and with Yordan and Tuck behind him, and see what happens. If it isn't working, then you look at Bregs or possibly Chas in that spot if Chas continues to play as well as he has been lately.
Farmer1906 said:Mathguy64 said:Farmer1906 said:Mathguy64 said:
They are selling assets to win a WS. Can't say as I blame them. We did it for JV and it worked. We tried it with Greinke and it was a pole shot from working.
We did do it to win a WS. This guarantees them nothing tho. Padres unloaded to get Snell, Soto, & Hader (all 3 light years better than what Tex just did) and they didn't make a WS last year and don't look like they will this year either.
No. We won the WS because we did it once and didn't win when we did it a second time. We did it to increase our chances to win a WS. That's why you do it. To increase your chances.
Sure. I bet the Mets thought they were increasing their chances when they spent 400 M on a roster this year.
I think they're blowing their wad because they overspent on big names so their window isn't going to stay open very long. Now they're doubling down on big trade names. The window maybe opened another inch but it also I probably slamming shut in 2 years.
SECcess12 said:
I can't believe we won a WS last year with our buffoon manager.
If we want to win another one, Crane/Dana have some tough decisions to make. Sounds like we aren't willing to do what is necessary including trades or parting with unproductive players.
SECcess12 said:
I can't believe we won a WS last year with our buffoon manager.
If we want to win another one, Crane/Dana have some tough decisions to make. Sounds like we aren't willing to do what is necessary including trades or parting with unproductive players.
tjack16 said:SECcess12 said:
I can't believe we won a WS last year with our buffoon manager.
If we want to win another one, Crane/Dana have some tough decisions to make. Sounds like we aren't willing to do what is necessary including trades or parting with unproductive players.
I'm convinced Biden could have managed this team to a WS last year with how good the bullpen was performing
mwm said:
It's already been said, but it's hard to believe that Crane would allow his investment to be mis-managed by an ego-driven old man.
Justin Verlander acknowledged that the Max Scherzer trade changes things for him and the Mets. “When you see that happen, you can’t help but think what it says for next year.”
— Tim Britton (@TimBritton) July 30, 2023