Chandler article / mailbag on the deadline:
Quote:
Hello, Astros fans. Good luck deciphering Dana Brown's trade deadline approach across the next eight days. This is Brown's first deadline as a general manager, so there are no tendencies to monitor or past situations to create a precedent. He has repeated all the things general managers are supposed to say this time of year, but until there is action, most of the words ring hollow.
Spot on
Quote:
Perhaps the most intriguing question is how much owner Jim Crane will insert himself into the team's decision-making. At last year's deadline, and at manager Dusty Baker's behest, the owner vetoed an agreed-upon trade with the Chicago Cubs involving Willson Contreras and Jos Urquidy.
Keep this in mind for the cost of a plus hitting rental
Quote:
Who do you realistically see the Astros being able to bring in at the deadline? I feel they need a high-leverage reliever and an impact starter at the very least. Brandon R.
Realistically, Brandon, they should focus on a veteran, innings-eating starter and a high-leverage reliever. The former is probably more pressing than the latter, but acquiring both should be atop Brown's priority list.
...
To compensate, Houston could trade from its major-league roster. Speaking on the team's pregame radio show on Sunday, assistant general manager Andrew Ball acknowledged the team is trying to be "creative" and will engage with other contending teams for "a good old fashioned baseball trade where both teams get better." Trading Maton for Straw in 2021 is a prime example and perhaps a blueprint for a deal Houston could swing during the deadline.
Priority 1 - SP, 2 - RP. Interesting.
Also, more smoke on trading away big league guys.
Quote:
Which prospects, if any, do the Astros consider untouchable as far as trades are concerned? Russell G.
In reality, Russell, there really shouldn't be many untouchable players. Sure, there are probably some prospects the team covets more than others, but the Astros don't have a top-100 prospect in Baseball America's most recently updated rankings. No players appeared in Keith Law's new top 60, either.
...
Dana Brown did tell the team's flagship radio show he won't move outfielder Drew Gilbert for a rental player. At the time of his comments, Gilbert was almost a consensus top-100 prospect. The new crop of draft picks has since moved him out of those rankings.
For a farm system thin on top-end talent, though, Brown's strategy is sound and should perhaps be applied to other prospects like Spencer Arrighetti, Ryan Clifford or Luis Baez. Moving them for rental players doesn't feel wise.
No one is untouchable, but don't be done with our top guys. Seems sound to me.
Quote:
Do you think the Astros are more likely to add rental player(s) or seek to add a player(s) with multiple years of control? J.M.
Given what they have to offer, J.M., rental players seem the most likely.
...
It's clear the Astros will need some rotation insurance next season. Whether they find some at the trade deadline or wait until the winter will be a fascinating subplot of the next eight days.
Fair point, but I think we go after both. But I think multiyear control for an RP is more likely. 2015 mentioned it, but it makes sense. It costs less and we have just a big of a need with so much guys hitting FA.
Quote:
What happens with the logjam in the outfield? Do the Astros trade from the mid ranks for a better pitcher or is someone like (Jake) Meyers used as a trade add-on? Neil B.
Dana Brown has already hinted what will likely happen, Neal. He told Ken Rosenthal last month the Astros were exploring trades involving exclusively major-league players and said, "If we could move an outfield piece for something that could fill another need, we probably would be interested in doing that."
...
Meyers and Julks remain the two most logical members of the major-league team to be traded before Aug. 1
Nothing to add just more smoke.