***** 2023 Houston Astros Season Thread *****

7,087,414 Views | 114825 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by texasaggie2015
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That is some kind of lineup
chlavinka
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guys need some rest. It's been a long stretch. Dusty gets that.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chlavinka said:

Guys need some rest. It's been a long stretch. Dusty gets that.


Yes they do. But why rest 4 starters in one game? Stagger the rest days
Big Al 1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is Yordan available to come in later in the game or PH or is he dinged up?
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big Al 1992 said:

Is Yordan available to come in later in the game or PH or is he dinged up?


He is on the 10 day IL. That's why Salazar is back up.
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big Al 1992 said:

Is Yordan available to come in later in the game or PH or is he dinged up?
He's on the IL.
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FrioAg 00 said:


Some of y'all need to slow down the anxiety and act like you've been through a season of being a baseball fan before.
The problem is everyone here has been through a season of Dusty and his aggressive desire to create the worst lineups possible.
HarryRocket
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They obviously accidentally uploaded a spring training lineup card. Right?
JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm actually shocked Dusty didn't sit Abreau after his 2 best games this entire season.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dusty could have at least kept Abreu at first, started Diaz at catcher, and put McCormick at DH. That would have offered a suitable upgrade (no Salazar) and given guys time off.

Bielak is defending the Alamo today.
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
MAROON
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They have an off day tomorrow. Altuve has been sitting most of the season and needs reps. That's the only thing I'm really frustrated with here
Beau Holder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marvin said:

Bielak is defending the Alamo today.
rosco511
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Frustrating that Chas not in the lineup today or more regularly. The Julks over Chas fascination that Dusty has just makes no sense when you look at any of the advanced statistics.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beau Holder said:

Marvin said:

Bielak is defending the Alamo today.

I, too, found that to be extremely funny
CFTXAG10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Won't be as frustrated if it means the lineups for the home stand look nothing like this
rmp15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Chas again
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CFTXAG10 said:

Won't be as frustrated if it means the lineups for the home stand look nothing like this


Thursday against the nationals Dusty will sit at least 3 regulars. Book it
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When does Dusty get a day off?
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the lineup is atrocious

as in the FBI needs to check cellphones after the game

at least the Indians are sitting Jose Ramirez today
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am not one that thinks Julks is so horrible he can't ever be used. Is Chas that much better? You decide.

Julks
175 PA
. 262/.286/.399, .332 BABIP, wOBA .296, xwOBA .259 (that whole OBA from BB is his issue IMHO)
5 HR, 22 RBI, 27.4% K, 3.4% BB (that's 6 in 175 PA and that's the issue), 10 SB
wRC+ 88, fWAR 0.5

Chas
125 PA
.227/.325/.427 .278 BABIP, wOBA .325, xwOBA .302
5 HR, 16 RBI, 26.4% K, 8.8% BB, 4 SB
wRC+ 108, fWAR 0.7

Julks does not get on base by the walk but he's getting on a lot more by hitting with the higher BABIP. It's not a trade off but it does even things up a little. Chas has more pop. The OBA metrics and counting measures factor those BB in positively so they favor Chas. Chas is IMHO clearly the better fielder and can play all 3 spots where Julks is a liability in LF.

The short version is Julks would look a lot better if he walked at the 8.8% clip that Chas does.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, Chas is clearly better and he's playing below his his last 2 years so you know he's able to play even better.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My guess is Yordan gets an additional 10 day IL stint and we don't see him until July
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Yes, Chas is clearly better and he's playing below his his last 2 years so you know he's able to play even better.
Been struggling a little bit, lately. We've run Maldy and Abreu out longer with bigger struggles, but Chas doesn't get that treatment.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

Farmer1906 said:

Yes, Chas is clearly better and he's playing below his his last 2 years so you know he's able to play even better.
Been struggling a little bit, lately. We've run Maldy and Abreu out longer with bigger struggles, but Chas doesn't get that treatment.


Nope. Not even close.
rosco511
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The answer is yes. Chas is above average at the plate and much better in the field than Julks, and Chas has a lot more of a sample size in his career to suggest success and production at least at same level.

Julks is 27 so is not a prospect, and his BABIP, lack of plate discipline, and other numbers suggest he might have a hard time even sustaining his current numbers, which are currently below average. For whatever reason, Dusty has never liked Chas, so at very least Diaz should be the one that is getting the Julks treatment by Dusty as he is the best prospect out of the trio with the most upside. However, really frustrating that Dusty has a proven above average outfielder in Chas who he continues to sit on a regular basis in favor of a below average outfielder who is not a prospect.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You know, it's going to be pretty funny to me when the organization trades Chas and makes Meyers the everyday CF after Crane getting snippy with Click about him.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guessing this has already been discussed at some point but Julks seems like "Dusty's guy" and he's going to continue getting as many "benefit of the doubt" nods as possible. Even if it goes against the organization's wish of getting Diaz more nods.

I remember how big of a surprise it was when he made the roster. If anyone played their way onto the team this past spring, it was Dirden. Texasaggie2015 even confirmed that the team was/is really high on Dirden.

The fact that Julks made it over Dirden, despite a solid but not great spring, seemed at the time like it was because we wanted Dirden to continue getting everyday reps at AAA while Julks would mostly ride the pine for the big club. My guess is that's how it was devised when they were set the roster.

But turns out, Dusty's advocacy for Julks was because he wants to play him. Like, all the time.

I'm kinda glad we are in an era of advanced stats, because at least it puts a little bit of a check on Dusty's transparent desire to force Julks into everyday playing time.

(And I definitely don't mean this post to be about Dirden vs Julks. Both seem very meh. Including Dirden in this post is more to point out that someone in our org had to have made a strong case to put Julks on the final roster over Dirden, seemingly out of no where. It seems obvious in hindsight that it was Dusty).
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
7-pitch 1st inning

go ahead and fire up the jet
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess we have completely given up the multiyear approach of taking pitches and working counts.

Just go up there hacking.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

I guess we have completely given up the multiyear approach of taking pitches and working counts.

Just go up there hacking.
Jim Schlossnagle would be losing his mind
Jet Black
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Should have signed a mlb caliber cf a while ago. Replacing Springer with McCormick/Myers isn't great.

If Brantley and Yordan weren't made of glass, Julks likely isn't on this roster or at least not playing much.
RC_57
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is the ump pissed they moved the game up an hour?
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
George hasn't been better than Jake this year and a hot run lately is the only reason he's ahead of Chas. Both run circles around Springer in CF now.
rosco511
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chas career numbers actually have him as an above average CF so not sure what else you want.
First Page Last Page
Page 673 of 3281
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.