***** 2023 Houston Astros Season Thread *****

6,684,718 Views | 114825 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by texasaggie2015
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JohnnyTexAg1995 said:

Tonight game is huge now!


Need to take advantage of the opportunity... unlike the past three or four chances.
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Willy Wonka said:

texasaggie2015 said:

I don't want to get slammed for being vague so I'll try to be careful with the wording, but I would really be shocked if Dusty is back next year. Unless he wins another title. Even then, I wouldn't be surprised to see him ride off into the sunset.

Dana and Dusty don't see eye to eye on a lot of things and Dana has made it clear to Crane that he wants someone who is his guy as manager. Dana jumped on board pretty late during the offseason when things were already structured a certain way. Things will likely look a lot different next year.


Does Dana think that Espada is "his guy"?
I would lean no. I don't think their careers have overlapped until now.
Big Al 1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watching LL WS - even Needville's manager knows with free runner on 2nd in extra innings, you bunt runner to third. Dusty should take notes!!
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Need to gain a game on Seattle tonight! No excuses
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big Al 1992 said:

Watching LL WS - even Needville's manager knows with free runner on 2nd in extra innings, you bunt runner to third. Dusty should take notes!!


I personally will always disagree with giving up an out to get a guy to 3rd.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big Al 1992 said:

Watching LL WS - even Needville's manager knows with free runner on 2nd in extra innings, you bunt runner to third. Dusty should take notes!!
Pretty sure the run expectancy drops from runner on 2nd no outs to runner on 3rd one out.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MLB 100%. LL I have no idea as I've never seen any data.
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Really just depends on who's at the plate and who's on deck for me
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Big Al 1992 said:

Watching LL WS - even Needville's manager knows with free runner on 2nd in extra innings, you bunt runner to third. Dusty should take notes!!
Pretty sure the run expectancy drops from runner on 2nd no outs to runner on 3rd one out.


I highly doubt that in Little League. I suspect there are many more wild pitches and passed balls.

But, on a related note, I think we've found the right level for Dusty to manage!
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

Big Al 1992 said:

Watching LL WS - even Needville's manager knows with free runner on 2nd in extra innings, you bunt runner to third. Dusty should take notes!!
Pretty sure the run expectancy drops from runner on 2nd no outs to runner on 3rd one out.


It's not worth the conversation, farmer. I've had the same discussion and have been told it's different when you only need one run even though there is no data set to support that claim and even though the multi-run expectancy tables include the one run you're trying to score.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marvin said:

Farmer1906 said:

Big Al 1992 said:

Watching LL WS - even Needville's manager knows with free runner on 2nd in extra innings, you bunt runner to third. Dusty should take notes!!
Pretty sure the run expectancy drops from runner on 2nd no outs to runner on 3rd one out.


I highly doubt that in Little League. I suspect there are many more wild pitches and passed balls.

But, on a related note, I think we've found the right level for Dusty to manage!
Hah. Fair. I was more so speaking to Dusty's decision making.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beat40 said:

Farmer1906 said:

Big Al 1992 said:

Watching LL WS - even Needville's manager knows with free runner on 2nd in extra innings, you bunt runner to third. Dusty should take notes!!
Pretty sure the run expectancy drops from runner on 2nd no outs to runner on 3rd one out.


It's not worth the conversation, farmer. I've had the same discussion and have been told it's different when you only need one run even though there is no data set to support that claim and even though the multi-run expectancy tables include the one run you're trying to score.


I know we have had this discussion more than once. I will say the RE tables all say they do not contain ANY Manfredball data. It's regular season play only.
Sex Panther
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texasaggie2015 said:




Phrasing
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a play Needville!!!
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

Beat40 said:

Farmer1906 said:

Big Al 1992 said:

Watching LL WS - even Needville's manager knows with free runner on 2nd in extra innings, you bunt runner to third. Dusty should take notes!!
Pretty sure the run expectancy drops from runner on 2nd no outs to runner on 3rd one out.


It's not worth the conversation, farmer. I've had the same discussion and have been told it's different when you only need one run even though there is no data set to support that claim and even though the multi-run expectancy tables include the one run you're trying to score.


I know we have had this discussion more than once. I will say the RE tables all say they do not contain ANY Manfredball data. It's regular season play only.


Sure but it knows what happens when someone reaches second with no outs.
Beau Holder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So Needville to play the TN-CA winner for the US title
SpaceCityAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Overall run expectancy drops, but that is not relevant in sudden death situations when all you care about is runs vs. NOT runs. With rounding,

Odds of scoring with runner on second and no outs is 62% (overall run expectancy is 1.12)
Odds of scoring with runner on third with one out is 66% (overall run expectancy is 0.95)

That is why bunting is generally a self-defeating strategy since it decreases overall run expectancy, but when one run is all that is needed, it makes sense. Said differently, bunting increases your odds of scoring exactly one run, but decreases your odds of scoring more than one run.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpaceCityAg05 said:

Overall run expectancy drops, but that is not relevant in sudden death situations when all you care about is runs vs. NOT runs. With rounding,

Odds of scoring with runner on second and no outs is 62% (overall run expectancy is 1.12)
Odds of scoring with runner on third with one out is 66% (overall run expectancy is 0.95)

That is why bunting is generally a self-defeating strategy since it decreases overall run expectancy, but when one run is all that is needed, it makes sense. Said differently, bunting increases your odds of scoring exactly one run, but decreases your odds of scoring more than one run.
True, but that only makes sense when bunting is 100% successful. What are the odds a sac bunt is successful? I think its more like 65%. Assume it is 65%. By your #s you have a 65% to increase your odds, but a 35% your odds drop significantly.

Here is win expectancy... a little different from your #s, but similarly close.

BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logic
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Found another fangraphs article on it.



This is just assuming the average outcome. It's not even factoring who's the batter, pitcher, defense, etc.

In the end, I think there is no obvious right or wrong answer for a runner on second with no outs in a tie game.
SpaceCityAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That is completely fair to question to role of bunt success into the strategy, especially with how poor players have become at a skill that used to be fundamental.

I was simply arguing the probabilities side, but yes, when you decide to bunt, you risk having a batter who can't bunt pop one up to the pitcher so that you end with a runner on second with one out.

That is why the best option is always the lefty contact hitter who can make sure to hit the ball to the right side.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Mathguy64 said:

Beat40 said:

Farmer1906 said:

Big Al 1992 said:

Watching LL WS - even Needville's manager knows with free runner on 2nd in extra innings, you bunt runner to third. Dusty should take notes!!
Pretty sure the run expectancy drops from runner on 2nd no outs to runner on 3rd one out.


It's not worth the conversation, farmer. I've had the same discussion and have been told it's different when you only need one run even though there is no data set to support that claim and even though the multi-run expectancy tables include the one run you're trying to score.


I know we have had this discussion more than once. I will say the RE tables all say they do not contain ANY Manfredball data. It's regular season play only.


Sure but it knows what happens when someone reaches second with no outs.


No. That RE table is based on people managing and making decisions to maximize the number of runs scored. It's not a simulation. It's the history of what happened, usually aggregated for 3 years. That's not the same as maximizing your chances of scoring only 1 run. You aren't trying to achieve the same outcome. And it doesn't include the outcomes based on the other team making decisions to minimize your chances of scoring only one run.

If you have a man on 3B with 2 outs you may be willing to walk a player or 2 to get to a preferred hitter if all you care about is the single run. Where in a regular game you would never do that.

You may also play your defense back with 0 outs and a man on 3B to give up a run to get an out. In Manfredball you cannot do that. The RE table includes the first scenario but in Manfredball you cannot do that.

I'm sure the teams (at least the smart ones) have simulated game data. But I'll bet good money it doesn't match the RE data.
Mr.Bond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phrasing said:

What a play Needville!!!


Im looking for Ray Finkle.... and a clean pair of shorts. Im just a very big Finkle fan. This is my Graceland, sir.


MAGA

Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SpaceCityAg05 said:

That is completely fair to question to role of bunt success into the strategy, especially with how poor players have become at a skill that used to be fundamental.

I was simply arguing the probabilities side, but yes, when you decide to bunt, you risk having a batter who can't bunt pop one up to the pitcher so that you end with a runner on second with one out.

That is why the best option is always the lefty contact hitter who can make sure to hit the ball to the right side.


But it's presented a lot on this forum as bunting in extras as the home team is all but iron clad. If the % bunt being successful is even 70%, do you want to take the 30% chance, which is significant by the way, you have a man on 2B with 1 out, which is a much worse outcome.

My point on the expectancy tables is man on 2B with 0 outs has a run expectancy over 1 and man on 3B with 1 out had a run expectancy below 1. To me that means the 1 run scores more often with a man on 2B with no outs than the 1 run scores with a man on 3B with 1 out.

Given the successful bunt % and the downside of a failed bunt being significantly worse coupled with the above, my official stance is in most cases I'd rather play it straight up and have the bunt option be a case by case basis.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just checked out Sale's last start. His velo was disgusting in a bad way.

Avg 4 Seam sub 92 and it dipped into the 80s a few times. He only threw 58 and 65 pitches during his last few starts.



Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Altuve broke Chris Sale back in the 2017 ALDS

Just another notch in the Stros belt
SECcess12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bregman will hit a homer tonight off of Sale
Lonestar_Ag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great job but was it really that great? he fielded it really slow and those kids are huge "12 yr olds" playing on a field the size my 9yr old plays on. Maybe smaller
Mr.Bond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im looking for Ray Finkle.... and a clean pair of shorts. Im just a very big Finkle fan. This is my Graceland, sir.


MAGA

Mr.Bond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lonestar_Ag09 said:

Great job but was it really that great? he fielded it really slow and those kids are huge "12 yr olds" playing on a field the size my 9yr old plays on. Maybe smaller



I bet you're a blast at parties
Im looking for Ray Finkle.... and a clean pair of shorts. Im just a very big Finkle fan. This is my Graceland, sir.


MAGA

wmitchell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr.Bond said:

Lonestar_Ag09 said:

Great job but was it really that great? he fielded it really slow and those kids are huge "12 yr olds" playing on a field the size my 9yr old plays on. Maybe smaller



I bet you're a blast at parties


Ha I was about to ask who pissed in his Cheerios?
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
stoneca said:

DA MARINERS LOSE!!!!
gougler08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Always about Dusty
First Page Last Page
Page 1878 of 3281
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.