I don't believe the additional revenue from adjoining assets will equate to a higher payroll.
I'm not doubting what you know or what your are being told.
I guess I'm coming from the perspective that Tom Hicks created a separate entity for parking, so that he could reduce the amount of revenue attached to the team, in order to justify a lower payroll.
I'm still trying to figure out how the Rangers justified the $120M payroll for 2019, as if that was all that the team's revenue could support.
We currently occupy a WC spot and I'm not expecting any increase in spending to fill the numerous holes we currently have.
I could be wrong and/or surprised.
I'm not doubting what you know or what your are being told.
I guess I'm coming from the perspective that Tom Hicks created a separate entity for parking, so that he could reduce the amount of revenue attached to the team, in order to justify a lower payroll.
I'm still trying to figure out how the Rangers justified the $120M payroll for 2019, as if that was all that the team's revenue could support.
We currently occupy a WC spot and I'm not expecting any increase in spending to fill the numerous holes we currently have.
I could be wrong and/or surprised.