DallasAg 94 said:
Proposition Joe said:
I'm really not sure why after watching sports for more than a few years that anyone would read anything into what any manager (or teammate) says positively about another player publicly.
Managers don't trash their players in the media. Players don't trash their teammates in the media. It's all coach/player-speak.
Only when you hear something negative should your ears perk up with realization that there may be something significant there.
That was coach speech?
I've never heard a coach go to the extent Woody did in that article.
Coach speak: "I really like Odor. He plays hard."
Not-Coach speak: "So you only hate him because he's good? Because he beats us, he hits homers off us, he's getting under our skin? I want guys like that on our team, because I want to do that to the opposing team."
Coaches don't publicly say they want players on their team, that they don't like. He would lose credibility with his other players.
He is saying that about a player *on his team*.
In an article *about* Odor where the writer wants comments *about* Odor.
You think if Woodward was coaching a team that Jose Bautista was on that he'd be saying the same things about Odor publicly?
It doesn't mean a thing. It's the sports equivalent of thinking because you called a former employer about a reference and they solely verify the dates of employment that they must have been a good employee otherwise they would have said otherwise.
I mean, I get that we're on a 24/7 sports-cycle so the talking heads and click-bait writers have to always have SOME kind of story... but I assumed any regular sports fan was wise enough to understand that a coach or teammate saying positive things about a player means absolutely nothing.
Go read some of those books about players who have nothing to lose regarding their historical image -- you find out real quick that a lot of these "real great clubhouses" were filled with guys who were racist, *******s and flat out did not like one another.