33 pts on 15 shots with 10 rebounds and 10 assists in game 5 on the road isn't choking. He didn't finish the game, but if Anderson, Ariza, and Gordon are hitting like they're capable this game is over half way through the fourth.Guitarsoup said:
I guess choking in the clutch against the Spurs again is better than not playing when you are hurt.
CFTXAG10 said:
Harden didn't play well down the stretch but at least he didn't sit out with a bo-bo on his ankle
He took 24 shots - 15 of them from three.Quote:
33 pts on 15 shots with 10 rebounds and 10 assists in game 5 on the road isn't choking.
JAMES HARDEN WAS COMMITTING THOSE TURNOVERS.Quote:
SA got a flurry of points out of Danny Green late while we had untimely turnovers....difference in the game.
The difference in the game was 3 points. Advantage, Spurs. Sugarcoat it all you want.primomosquito said:33 pts on 15 shots with 10 rebounds and 10 assists in game 5 on the road isn't choking. He didn't finish the game, but if Anderson, Ariza, and Gordon are hitting like they're capable this game is over half way through the fourth.Guitarsoup said:
I guess choking in the clutch against the Spurs again is better than not playing when you are hurt.
SA got a flurry of points out of Danny Green late while we had untimely turnovers....difference in the game.
They were applying heat to his thigh. Cramping, probably.CFTXAG10 said:
For the record my comment about Kawhi sitting out was a joke. I do hope he makes a speedy recovery and I was happy to hear he will be back for game 6. He makes these games more exciting.
As an aside: Were they just icing his right leg during the game or what was that they were wrapping him with? I had to mute Reggie and missed it.
I can still make fun of this though, right?Quote:
They were applying heat to his thigh. Cramping, probably.
Kawhi didn't cry like a little beitch, so, yes.Guitarsoup said:I can still make fun of this though, right?Quote:
They were applying heat to his thigh. Cramping, probably.
CFTXAG10 said:
Harden didn't play well down the stretch but at least he didn't sit out with a bo-bo on his ankle
Are you guys only happy if you win based off a bad performance from Harden? I already admitted he didn't finish the game....but the fact remains we're not even in the game without him. That's not sugar coating it. You won the game, congrats. Enjoy it. If you're only happy with a win bc of Harden, then good on you.aggieZephyr said:The difference in the game was 3 points. Advantage, Spurs. Sugarcoat it all you want.primomosquito said:33 pts on 15 shots with 10 rebounds and 10 assists in game 5 on the road isn't choking. He didn't finish the game, but if Anderson, Ariza, and Gordon are hitting like they're capable this game is over half way through the fourth.Guitarsoup said:
I guess choking in the clutch against the Spurs again is better than not playing when you are hurt.
SA got a flurry of points out of Danny Green late while we had untimely turnovers....difference in the game.
How many points do you get for a turnover? Harden turned it over, but it wasn't a given that we were going to score, especially the way both teams were shooting in OT.Guitarsoup said:He took 24 shots - 15 of them from three.Quote:
33 pts on 15 shots with 10 rebounds and 10 assists in game 5 on the road isn't choking.
4-15 from three point land.
9 turnovers.
0-4 with 4 turnovers in the last 8 minutes of the game including getting your **** packed by a guy that is about to turn 40 is absolutely choking.JAMES HARDEN WAS COMMITTING THOSE TURNOVERS.Quote:
SA got a flurry of points out of Danny Green late while we had untimely turnovers....difference in the game.
I don't have to tell myself anything, the last two pages on the Spurs thread are mostly focused on Harden.Guitarsoup said:
We are happy because a long time fan favorite that is clearly over the hill and no longer the player he once was made a series of huge clutch plays giving us a glimpse of the past.
Doesn't matter at all that he blocked Harden. That would have been just as clutch if he blocked Gordon and maybe more clutch if he blocked an Anderson three. But the fact that Manu was giving an incredible effort to hang with one of the best players in the NBA was heart warming for a fan base that has been cheering him on for ~15 years.
But go ahead and tell yourself whatever you need to hear to make yourself feel better.
primomosquito said:Are you guys only happy if you win based off a bad performance from Harden? I already admitted he didn't finish the game....but the fact remains we're not even in the game without him. That's not sugar coating it. You won the game, congrats. Enjoy it. If you're only happy with a win bc of Harden, then good on you.aggieZephyr said:The difference in the game was 3 points. Advantage, Spurs. Sugarcoat it all you want.primomosquito said:33 pts on 15 shots with 10 rebounds and 10 assists in game 5 on the road isn't choking. He didn't finish the game, but if Anderson, Ariza, and Gordon are hitting like they're capable this game is over half way through the fourth.Guitarsoup said:
I guess choking in the clutch against the Spurs again is better than not playing when you are hurt.
SA got a flurry of points out of Danny Green late while we had untimely turnovers....difference in the game.
I guess you're all butt hurt about the fact that Kawhi will finish 3rd at best in the MVP race. I get it, but you still have more to play for.
It's like this:Guitarsoup said:
We are happy because a long time fan favorite that is clearly over the hill and no longer the player he once was made a series of huge clutch plays giving us a glimpse of the past.
Doesn't matter at all that he blocked Harden. That would have been just as clutch if he blocked Gordon and maybe more clutch if he blocked an Anderson three. But the fact that Manu was giving an incredible effort to hang with one of the best players in the NBA was heart warming for a fan base that has been cheering him on for ~15 years.
But go ahead and tell yourself whatever you need to hear to make yourself feel better.
PtR w/ the goodsQuote:
Even though Kawhi didn't Manu in Manutime, it didn't Manu because Manu Manu'd all over the Manu until there was no more Manu for Manu to Manu. When he needed to Manu, he Manu'd, and when Manu Manus there's no more Manu to Manu.
When you have a Manu like Manu, then you can Manu him to Manucome when the Manu is on the Manu. There are Manus who can Manu, and some Manus who just Manu like it's Manu. Appreciate the way that Manu has of Manuing even when it Manus like there's no Manu to Manu. And yet he Manus all the same. Somemanu Manu Manu, and other Manu Manu Manus the Manu. But whether Manu Manus Manu Manu, or Manus the Manu Manu, you can always Manu on Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu.
Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu.tbirdspur2010 said:It's like this:Guitarsoup said:
We are happy because a long time fan favorite that is clearly over the hill and no longer the player he once was made a series of huge clutch plays giving us a glimpse of the past.
Doesn't matter at all that he blocked Harden. That would have been just as clutch if he blocked Gordon and maybe more clutch if he blocked an Anderson three. But the fact that Manu was giving an incredible effort to hang with one of the best players in the NBA was heart warming for a fan base that has been cheering him on for ~15 years.
But go ahead and tell yourself whatever you need to hear to make yourself feel better.PtR w/ the goodsQuote:
Even though Kawhi didn't Manu in Manutime, it didn't Manu because Manu Manu'd all over the Manu until there was no more Manu for Manu to Manu. When he needed to Manu, he Manu'd, and when Manu Manus there's no more Manu to Manu.
When you have a Manu like Manu, then you can Manu him to Manucome when the Manu is on the Manu. There are Manus who can Manu, and some Manus who just Manu like it's Manu. Appreciate the way that Manu has of Manuing even when it Manus like there's no Manu to Manu. And yet he Manus all the same. Somemanu Manu Manu, and other Manu Manu Manus the Manu. But whether Manu Manus Manu Manu, or Manus the Manu Manu, you can always Manu on Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu.
Spurs are going to lose tonight.azulAg said:a *****BirdhunterAg13 said:brotheraggie said:You sound delicious!! LOL Irony is so flattering!! Thanks again!!BirdhunterAg13 said:brotheraggie said:BirdhunterAg13!!!! You and azulAg make a cute couple being closet fans LOLBirdhunterAg13 said:azulAg said:im not a closet spurs fan, i am a spurs fanbrotheraggie said:azulAg is a closet Spurs fan!! LOLHossAg said:
I wonder how many times azulAg can manage to be wrong on one page
Dude he's a troll. Don't respond to his comments
Oh man. You really got me good there
Delicious? Who the **** says that?
koolbrotheraggie said:Spurs are going to lose tonight.azulAg said:a *****BirdhunterAg13 said:brotheraggie said:You sound delicious!! LOL Irony is so flattering!! Thanks again!!BirdhunterAg13 said:brotheraggie said:BirdhunterAg13!!!! You and azulAg make a cute couple being closet fans LOLBirdhunterAg13 said:azulAg said:im not a closet spurs fan, i am a spurs fanbrotheraggie said:azulAg is a closet Spurs fan!! LOLHossAg said:
I wonder how many times azulAg can manage to be wrong on one page
Dude he's a troll. Don't respond to his comments
Oh man. You really got me good there
Delicious? Who the **** says that?
Manu is a class act.demack06 said:Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu.tbirdspur2010 said:It's like this:Guitarsoup said:
We are happy because a long time fan favorite that is clearly over the hill and no longer the player he once was made a series of huge clutch plays giving us a glimpse of the past.
Doesn't matter at all that he blocked Harden. That would have been just as clutch if he blocked Gordon and maybe more clutch if he blocked an Anderson three. But the fact that Manu was giving an incredible effort to hang with one of the best players in the NBA was heart warming for a fan base that has been cheering him on for ~15 years.
But go ahead and tell yourself whatever you need to hear to make yourself feel better.PtR w/ the goodsQuote:
Even though Kawhi didn't Manu in Manutime, it didn't Manu because Manu Manu'd all over the Manu until there was no more Manu for Manu to Manu. When he needed to Manu, he Manu'd, and when Manu Manus there's no more Manu to Manu.
When you have a Manu like Manu, then you can Manu him to Manucome when the Manu is on the Manu. There are Manus who can Manu, and some Manus who just Manu like it's Manu. Appreciate the way that Manu has of Manuing even when it Manus like there's no Manu to Manu. And yet he Manus all the same. Somemanu Manu Manu, and other Manu Manu Manus the Manu. But whether Manu Manus Manu Manu, or Manus the Manu Manu, you can always Manu on Manu Manu Manu Manu Manu.
Either way neithe team will beat Golden State!!azulAg said:koolbrotheraggie said:Spurs are going to lose tonight.azulAg said:a *****BirdhunterAg13 said:brotheraggie said:You sound delicious!! LOL Irony is so flattering!! Thanks again!!BirdhunterAg13 said:brotheraggie said:BirdhunterAg13!!!! You and azulAg make a cute couple being closet fans LOLBirdhunterAg13 said:azulAg said:im not a closet spurs fan, i am a spurs fanbrotheraggie said:azulAg is a closet Spurs fan!! LOLHossAg said:
I wonder how many times azulAg can manage to be wrong on one page
Dude he's a troll. Don't respond to his comments
Oh man. You really got me good there
Delicious? Who the **** says that?
