Nice of you to write off Reed so quickly and act like he won't improve.NoahAg said:Onionman said:
Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.
tu is really good this year due to their defense.
Ewers would be an upgrade to any QB on our roster.
Pretty much agree with you.Danny Vermin said:
If one of those three teams wins the Championship, im betting the defenses get alot of the credit.
As far as Ewers, he's just not as consistent as he should be. Some games he looks like the best QB in College Football but others he looks average.
This.Flavius Agximus said:Nevertheless, we let him score, when everyone including every casual fan watching TV knew he was going to run the ball.vander54 said:Bill Superman said:
Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.
Manning runs a 4.6 40
Not exactly slow
You might be right. But I just don't see him doing well at the next level.Danny Vermin said:
I dont know any Texas fans who think that to be honest with you and I know quite a few. Ewers best asset is his calmness and that's hard to find in a QB. Dude never seems to get rattled even if things are not going well. I think he has a chance to be a good NFL QB if he sits and learns. He can make every throw.
To be fair Manziel ran faster unoffical 40 times. So I would take the 4.6 with a grain of salt.Harry Dunne said:It's incredibly fast for any QB. This isn't some clown high school coach hand timing and giving everybody .3 seconds off.jt16 said:vander54 said:Bill Superman said:
Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.
Manning runs a 4.6 40
Not exactly slow
That's not fast for major college football.
It's faster than Johnny (4.68) or Tannehill (4.65).
Educate yourself.
Onionman said:Nice of you to write off Reed so quickly and act like he won't improve.NoahAg said:Onionman said:
Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.
tu is really good this year due to their defense.
Ewers would be an upgrade to any QB on our roster.
Reed had a better QBR his first year than Ewers did this year while Ewers played behind a better line and had more weapons.
Onionman said:To be fair Manziel ran faster unoffical 40 times. So I would take the 4.6 with aHarry Dunne said:It's incredibly fast for any QB. This isn't some clown high school coach hand timing and giving everybody .3 seconds off.jt16 said:vander54 said:Bill Superman said:
Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.
Manning runs a 4.6 40
Not exactly slow
That's not fast for major college football.
It's faster than Johnny (4.68) or Tannehill (4.65).
Educate yourself.grain of saltline of blow.
greg.w.h said:Onionman said:Nice of you to write off Reed so quickly and act like he won't improve.NoahAg said:Onionman said:
Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.
tu is really good this year due to their defense.
Ewers would be an upgrade to any QB on our roster.
Reed had a better QBR his first year than Ewers did this year while Ewers played behind a better line and had more weapons.
"Total quarterback rating (abbreviated as total QBR or simply QBR) is a proprietary statistic created by ESPN in 2011 to grade the performance of quarterbacks in American football games. ESPN claims that it created QBR to be a more meaningful alternative to the traditional passer rating statistic by incorporating "all of a quarterback's contributions to winning, including how he impacts the game on passes, rushes, turnovers, and penalties. Since QBR is built from the play level, it accounts for a team's level of success or failure on every play to provide the proper context, then allocates credit to the quarterback and his teammates to produce a clearer measure of quarterback efficiency."[1] However, ESPN has never released the complete formulas and procedures to calculate QBR,[2] resulting in criticism among fans and commentators alike questioning the results.[3]"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_quarterback_rating
Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
no one thinks he's the next JFF. We just aren't morons who think he's slow.Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
Yeah, I mean anyone like Johnny would be the starter the second they hit campus, right?LB12Diamond said:Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
Who knows how Arch will play next year.
But yes, if he were the next coming of JFF or whomever, he would not have been the back-up the last two years.
Nobody said he's going to be the next JFF; only that his reported 40 time is better.Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
concac said:Nobody said he's going to be the next JFF; only that his reported 40 time is better.Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
Everybody is gonna find out next year how good (or bad) he'll be. But from the limited time we saw him on the field, I think he has the potential to be pretty damn good.
Do you actually remember the amount of hype around Johnny when he signed?LB12Diamond said:
If Arch were anywhere close to JFF with the hype around him, he would have played as a true fish.
Harry Dunne said:Yeah, I mean anyone like Johnny would be the starter the second they hit campus, right?LB12Diamond said:Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
Who knows how Arch will play next year.
But yes, if he were the next coming of JFF or whomever, he would not have been the back-up the last two years.
You'd have to be a moron to think he's quicker than JFF just because sip told you so.Harry Dunne said:no one thinks he's the next JFF. We just aren't morons who think he's slow.Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
There's also a reason Johnny got redshirted. Let's give it time before we start anointing or discarding anybody. Whether it's our guys or theirs.
JPN06 said:Do you actually remember the amount of hype around Johnny when he signed?LB12Diamond said:
If Arch were anywhere close to JFF with the hype around him, he would have played as a true fish.
https://n.rivals.com/content/athletes/johnny-manziel-19867?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAN2-bC13OaSQsL5dFiv_z2osD7A2xfTR0pRyrO4TjqW1Ci87ask5TJFVvYDa0F4Ze_yVDP3UEFFYl6wDKaMeHjL0Szw9ScSM6tZEaSOhq_C-tOdMGVxIUYTFUpOku2CzZSYhn4UPQFHrEcKcUw58txbLtetYBFNMjanDQXfA-sUz&view=pv
Someone said that Manning is slow. Manning's reported 40 time is 4.6 which is faster than JFF. Nobody ever said that JFF is slow.LB12Diamond said:concac said:Nobody said he's going to be the next JFF; only that his reported 40 time is better.Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
Everybody is gonna find out next year how good (or bad) he'll be. But from the limited time we saw him on the field, I think he has the potential to be pretty damn good.
40 time.
What in the world are you talking about? I have never heard 40 time ever when talking about JFF. The way he played had nothing to do with his 40. LOL
Being illusive and making plays like he did, there's no metric for it.
Man, if I'm a sip, I'm really playing the long game. I've been posting here longer than Arch has been alive.LB12Diamond said:Harry Dunne said:Yeah, I mean anyone like Johnny would be the starter the second they hit campus, right?LB12Diamond said:Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
Who knows how Arch will play next year.
But yes, if he were the next coming of JFF or whomever, he would not have been the back-up the last two years.
Wait
You do realize he's been the back up two years. Not one, right?? LOL
Big big difference
Are you a sip protecting your boy Arch.
KCup17 said:JPN06 said:Do you actually remember the amount of hype around Johnny when he signed?LB12Diamond said:
If Arch were anywhere close to JFF with the hype around him, he would have played as a true fish.
https://n.rivals.com/content/athletes/johnny-manziel-19867?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAN2-bC13OaSQsL5dFiv_z2osD7A2xfTR0pRyrO4TjqW1Ci87ask5TJFVvYDa0F4Ze_yVDP3UEFFYl6wDKaMeHjL0Szw9ScSM6tZEaSOhq_C-tOdMGVxIUYTFUpOku2CzZSYhn4UPQFHrEcKcUw58txbLtetYBFNMjanDQXfA-sUz&view=pv
Am I dumb? I don't remember any hype around him when he signed? Just that he was a good dual threat athlete.
There was not much hype. That's the point. The first I ever heard of him was getting arrested for fighting a homeless guy and seeing the mug shot with his shirt off and wondering who this clown was.KCup17 said:JPN06 said:Do you actually remember the amount of hype around Johnny when he signed?LB12Diamond said:
If Arch were anywhere close to JFF with the hype around him, he would have played as a true fish.
https://n.rivals.com/content/athletes/johnny-manziel-19867?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAN2-bC13OaSQsL5dFiv_z2osD7A2xfTR0pRyrO4TjqW1Ci87ask5TJFVvYDa0F4Ze_yVDP3UEFFYl6wDKaMeHjL0Szw9ScSM6tZEaSOhq_C-tOdMGVxIUYTFUpOku2CzZSYhn4UPQFHrEcKcUw58txbLtetYBFNMjanDQXfA-sUz&view=pv
Am I dumb? I don't remember any hype around him when he signed? Just that he was a good dual threat athlete.
Bill Superman said:
As much as y'all think Manning is the next JFF, there's a reason Sark is rolling with Ewers who clearly has his limits.
Manning isn't what y'all were told he is.
