Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Ewers to ND

24,600 Views | 151 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by GinMan
Hill08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heard some chatter that his NFL evaluation isn't looking real good and ND is in play big time…
Onionman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.

tu is really good this year due to their defense.
Bill Superman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Terrible troll
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
He will be drafted but not day 1 and maybe not even day 2.
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow
World's worst proofreader
jt16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where do people come up with this stuff?
jt16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.
Hill08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

Terrible troll


Why is this trolling? Heard this from a good (not great) source. Ewers will not be at tu next year.
AggieBB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.
So dumb
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did you hear it from someone who's brother's friend's uncle heard it at 31 flavors?
BrandonJ51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's sure as hell not slow either. Manziel ran a 4.68 at the combine
TxAg76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jt16 said:

vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.


At the QB position, it'll work just fine
concac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jt16 said:

vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.
It's fast enough for a QB.

Manziel ran a 4.68 at the combine and he didn't have any trouble running away from defenders at A&M.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
jt16 said:

vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.


Not necessarily fast but definitely not a slow ass
World's worst proofreader
Harry Dunne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jt16 said:

vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.
It's incredibly fast for any QB. This isn't some clown high school coach hand timing and giving everybody .3 seconds off.

It's faster than Johnny (4.68) or Tannehill (4.65).

Educate yourself.
Flavius Agximus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow
Nevertheless, we let him score, when everyone including every casual fan watching TV knew he was going to run the ball.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Harry Dunne said:

jt16 said:

vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.
It's incredibly fast for any QB. This isn't some clown high school coach hand timing and giving everybody .3 seconds off.

It's faster than Johnny (4.68) or Tannehill (4.65).

Educate yourself.


No way in hell does he run a 4.6
Aggie Dad 26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onionman said:

Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.

tu is really good this year due to their defense.


I wish we had a qb that wasn't very good but could win games like he has
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Muy said:

Harry Dunne said:

jt16 said:

vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.
It's incredibly fast for any QB. This isn't some clown high school coach hand timing and giving everybody .3 seconds off.

It's faster than Johnny (4.68) or Tannehill (4.65).

Educate yourself.


No way in hell does he run a 4.6
maybe with a running start.
Harry Dunne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

Harry Dunne said:

jt16 said:

vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.
It's incredibly fast for any QB. This isn't some clown high school coach hand timing and giving everybody .3 seconds off.

It's faster than Johnny (4.68) or Tannehill (4.65).

Educate yourself.


No way in hell does he run a 4.6
Probably not, but don't tell me 4.6 is not elite for a QB.
Seasoned Lifeguard
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

Harry Dunne said:

jt16 said:

vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.
It's incredibly fast for any QB. This isn't some clown high school coach hand timing and giving everybody .3 seconds off.

It's faster than Johnny (4.68) or Tannehill (4.65).

Educate yourself.


No way in hell does he run a 4.6


I'd bet he does. He hit 20.7 mph earlier this year
Onionman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad 26 said:

Onionman said:

Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.

tu is really good this year due to their defense.


I wish we had a qb that wasn't very good but could win games like he has
If we had the tu defense this year then Reed would have won many more games.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
vander54 said:

He will be drafted but not day 1 and maybe not even day 2.
He'll take a pay cut if he does. ND and Oregon may make it worth is while to stick around another year.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Onionman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad 26 said:

Onionman said:

Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.

tu is really good this year due to their defense.


I wish we had a qb that wasn't very good but could win games like he has
This year Reed had a QBR rating of 75.6 while Ewers was at 73.0.

You really think Ewers would have won more games if he played for A&M than Reed won?

vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Onionman said:

Aggie Dad 26 said:

Onionman said:

Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.

tu is really good this year due to their defense.


I wish we had a qb that wasn't very good but could win games like he has
If we had the tu defense this year then Reed would have won many more games.


Reed was better than Ewers in most categories
World's worst proofreader
Showstopper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jt16 said:

vander54 said:

Bill Superman said:

Who cares. We somehow managed to let mannings slow ass stumble into our endzone anyways, so we have our work cut out regardless.


Manning runs a 4.6 40

Not exactly slow


That's not fast for major college football.
For someone with the last name "Manning" a 4.6 is like Usain Bolt.
Danny Vermin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Except, you know, in Wins.
Onionman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

Onionman said:

Aggie Dad 26 said:

Onionman said:

Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.

tu is really good this year due to their defense.


I wish we had a qb that wasn't very good but could win games like he has
If we had the tu defense this year then Reed would have won many more games.


Reed was better than Ewers in most categories
Agreed.

Ewers had a better line and better receivers yet Reed still had a better QBR.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Danny Vermin said:

Except, you know, in Wins.


Yes because the QB is the only player that affects wins.
World's worst proofreader
Sq 17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hill08 said:

BMX Bandit said:

Terrible troll


Why is this trolling? Heard this from a good (not great) source. Ewers will not be at tu next year.


Ewers will probably not be at tu
May stay in college instead of going pro
Won't be at tu jmho
Onionman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danny Vermin said:

Except, you know, in Wins.
So I guess if OSU, Georgia or tu wins the championship then their respective QBs will be considered the best in college football?
90ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Much internet chatter that he has $6M NIL offer on the table and spec it is ND (who appears their motto is buy a QB each year).

Hoping it's enough noise to eff up sips and lose sometime during the CFP.

Regarding manning rushing, he's faster than most realize and stronger. We made Ewers look all world running on a gimpy ankle (why, the DC, whomever it is, needs to revamp the Safety speed on this team).
Danny Vermin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If one of those three teams wins the Championship, im betting the defenses get alot of the credit.

As far as Ewers, he's just not as consistent as he should be. Some games he looks like the best QB in College Football but others he looks average.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onionman said:

Not surprising that his evaluation is not that good because he is not very good.

tu is really good this year due to their defense.

Ewers would be an upgrade to any QB on our roster.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.