BMX Bandit said:
$3 Sack of Groceries said:
So BMX, after seeing every Twitter link above, are you still asserting that I'm mistaken and this is anything other than "pay for play"?
Like I said, it was obvious from the get go what this was about.
It is painful clear you just refuse to read what i have posted.
I said from the get go in the initial post that started this thread he's not getting the NIL opportunities he was promised, and that means money. your continued attempts to distort what I have posted are going to be ignored. feel free to have the last word, I won't be reading it.
Of course you won't because despite all of your accusations that
I'M wrong/mistaken/misunderstanding it's clear that you're the one who can't even keep your argument straight and are dying on your hill of obstinance.
In your own OP you wrote
"NIL is not "pay for play" but it's "you better pay what you said if you want me to play".
I responded saying NIL absolutley is pay for play and you went off the rails essentially responding "nuh uh!" and then proceeded to give nothing but examples of guys getting promised benefits for playing. If that's not pay for play, what is?!? How in the hell do you not understand that. You can nuance the hell outta what the benefits are but there is ZERO question that he was induced to play at UNLV for "benefits." Again, the picture book definition of pay for play.
I read every one of your retorts and you did nothing but consistently emphasize that fact that this unquestionably pay for play. You've got insiders on Twitter telling you that the dust up was over the amount paid….which is exactly what I told you it was (and anyone with any common sense and without an agenda obviously knew).
And now you're going to attempt to claim some sort of faux maturity bit and take your ball and go home? Give me a ****ing break.