heddy Lamarr said:

---

We all knew who Jimbo was before he arrived at A&M. If somehow you thought he'd start to grow a set of values or respect for the rules by landing in Aggieland well you're wrong.

---

Wow.
You
Need
To
Go
Away

heddy Lamarr said:

---

We all knew who Jimbo was before he arrived at A&M. If somehow you thought he'd start to grow a set of values or respect for the rules by landing in Aggieland well you're wrong.

---

This schtick is so tired.

Many years ago when I was flying 40 plus weeks a year I looked forward to picking up a USA Today paper for the flight. Suddenly the USA Today took a HARD left turn and I haven't read one since. However, when they hand the USA Today our for free at the hotel or airport I always take one and quickly deposit same in the trash.

My 2 questions,,,

1) prior to his transfer request, where did he stand on the 2-deep?

2) why would we allow a redshirt freshman host recruits during unofficial visits, let alone give him cash to entertain them??

Quints boat from JAWS didn't smell as fishy as this!

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

Anyone wanting A&M to bring a legal case against Marchiol is an idiot. The last thing we need is give this kids attorneys the right to discovery in our football coaches business and communications.

---

It sounds like you have never been involved in a discovery fight. Discovery is limited to that which is likely to lead to admissible evidence. They don't get to peruse through every document and fighting to get documents is 80% of litigation costs. You think A&M will just willfully give over any and all documents for dude's lawyer to rifle through?

---

I understand completely. Take something simple that wouldn't be limited. You want our coaching staff's text conversations with players being combed through? I sure as hell don't.

---

Only the texts between the coach and Marchiol would be discoverable in a defamation case. All other texts by that coach and any other person would not be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and a protective order would be issued.

---

You are either (1) a bad attorney or (2) bad at playing an attorney on the internet. For your sake, I hope it's the latter.

---

Sounds like you're a regular Johnny Cockran.

In a defamation case, please tell me what texts other than those between the player and coach he defamed would be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

In fact, draft a request for production that you believe would get discovery beyond the communications between the defamed coach and the player. (Remember: defamation case)

I'll wait.

---

I hope you didn't wait too long. You are clearly have no clue what you are talking about. I guess you hope that your dumb/cocky tone will make you sound smart. What would the communications between the coach and player have to do with anything in this stupid defamation case you came up with?

Anyways, a ton of texts and communications would be discoverable. Maybe you should look up the defenses to defamation and see if you can come up with any reasons why a ton of texts would be discoverable. That shouldn't be too hard for an internet badass like yourself.

---

Yeah, that's what I thought. You don't know what the **** you're talking about. I'll chalk this up to you biting off more than you can chew.

Aggie's sticking up for Aggies.

This will end poorly for that ****y

Point across

Tons of players standing up for the football program. Makes me wonder actually if there was some bad blood between Marichol and the rest of the team.

Dousche

Between the lawyers and the democrats, this thread has really gone downhill.

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

Anyone wanting A&M to bring a legal case against Marchiol is an idiot. The last thing we need is give this kids attorneys the right to discovery in our football coaches business and communications.

---

It sounds like you have never been involved in a discovery fight. Discovery is limited to that which is likely to lead to admissible evidence. They don't get to peruse through every document and fighting to get documents is 80% of litigation costs. You think A&M will just willfully give over any and all documents for dude's lawyer to rifle through?

---

I understand completely. Take something simple that wouldn't be limited. You want our coaching staff's text conversations with players being combed through? I sure as hell don't.

---

Only the texts between the coach and Marchiol would be discoverable in a defamation case. All other texts by that coach and any other person would not be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and a protective order would be issued.

---

You are either (1) a bad attorney or (2) bad at playing an attorney on the internet. For your sake, I hope it's the latter.

---

Sounds like you're a regular Johnny Cockran.

In a defamation case, please tell me what texts other than those between the player and coach he defamed would be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

In fact, draft a request for production that you believe would get discovery beyond the communications between the defamed coach and the player. (Remember: defamation case)

I'll wait.

---

I hope you didn't wait too long. You are clearly have no clue what you are talking about. I guess you hope that your dumb/cocky tone will make you sound smart. What would the communications between the coach and player have to do with anything in this stupid defamation case you came up with?

Anyways, a ton of texts and communications would be discoverable. Maybe you should look up the defenses to defamation and see if you can come up with any reasons why a ton of texts would be discoverable. That shouldn't be too hard for an internet badass like yourself.

---

Yeah, that's what I thought. You don't know what the **** you're talking about. I'll chalk this up to you biting off more than you can chew.

---

.

I literallly gave you the answer and you are too dumb to realize it. Lol know I remember why I don't come to the zoo often.

Lawyers. Even ruin the zoo

Turns out #32 was a spoiled, selfish, gutless ****.

Good riddance

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

Anyone wanting A&M to bring a legal case against Marchiol is an idiot. The last thing we need is give this kids attorneys the right to discovery in our football coaches business and communications.

---

It sounds like you have never been involved in a discovery fight. Discovery is limited to that which is likely to lead to admissible evidence. They don't get to peruse through every document and fighting to get documents is 80% of litigation costs. You think A&M will just willfully give over any and all documents for dude's lawyer to rifle through?

---

I understand completely. Take something simple that wouldn't be limited. You want our coaching staff's text conversations with players being combed through? I sure as hell don't.

---

Only the texts between the coach and Marchiol would be discoverable in a defamation case. All other texts by that coach and any other person would not be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and a protective order would be issued.

---

You are either (1) a bad attorney or (2) bad at playing an attorney on the internet. For your sake, I hope it's the latter.

---

Sounds like you're a regular Johnny Cockran.

In a defamation case, please tell me what texts other than those between the player and coach he defamed would be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

In fact, draft a request for production that you believe would get discovery beyond the communications between the defamed coach and the player. (Remember: defamation case)

I'll wait.

---

I hope you didn't wait too long. You are clearly have no clue what you are talking about. I guess you hope that your dumb/cocky tone will make you sound smart. What would the communications between the coach and player have to do with anything in this stupid defamation case you came up with?

Anyways, a ton of texts and communications would be discoverable. Maybe you should look up the defenses to defamation and see if you can come up with any reasons why a ton of texts would be discoverable. That shouldn't be too hard for an internet badass like yourself.

---

Yeah, that's what I thought. You don't know what the **** you're talking about. I'll chalk this up to you biting off more than you can chew.

---

.

I literallly gave you the answer and you are too dumb to realize it. Lol know I remember why I don't come to the zoo often.

---

And, I literally told you to write the RFP. You either won't because you know it will get destroyed or you can't, so STFU.

beerad12man said:

---

You're a loser

---

I'm beginning to think he was Sumlin's drinking buddy.

Article says his dad is a financial adviser? Hope his financial advice is better than his transfer advice. Something tells me he's probably slimy in his profession too.

Who else should be his financial advisor?

Is A financial adviser. As in that is his profession.

He's a college kid, you think he needs a financial advisor? Whats he gonna do, tell him to invest that $600 cash from Peveto in some Fidelity funds?

What he needs, if he was actually any good is an agent, but he's not allowed to have that. His Dad was an NFL player, and his parents seem to own multiple businesses. He's got better financial representation that probably 99.9% of NCAA athletes on that basis alone. It would actually be nice if every player (actually I'm gonna say every student) had a father who could be considered a financial advisor.

Here you go:

His dad's profession could possibly be that of advising people on how to invest their money or selling them certain financial products.

This transfer scheme, which may have been led by his dad, indicates he's willing to screw anyone/everyone if it benefits him or his family. If that is the case, it is not someone I would want to turn to for financial help as he may not really have my best interest in mind, but rather his own.

My point had zero to do with financial advice between him and his son.

Misread your post then as "his financial advisor"

I think Ken Marchiol is more of an insurance salesman than a financial advisor in his main job. Not that there is a huge difference between the two.

His dad seems to have been sued a few times over insurance and financial related related matters, so he is indeed looks like an insurance salesman.



https://www.juralindex.com/kenneth-j-marchiol.html

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

Anyone wanting A&M to bring a legal case against Marchiol is an idiot. The last thing we need is give this kids attorneys the right to discovery in our football coaches business and communications.

---

It sounds like you have never been involved in a discovery fight. Discovery is limited to that which is likely to lead to admissible evidence. They don't get to peruse through every document and fighting to get documents is 80% of litigation costs. You think A&M will just willfully give over any and all documents for dude's lawyer to rifle through?

---

I understand completely. Take something simple that wouldn't be limited. You want our coaching staff's text conversations with players being combed through? I sure as hell don't.

---

Only the texts between the coach and Marchiol would be discoverable in a defamation case. All other texts by that coach and any other person would not be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and a protective order would be issued.

---

You are either (1) a bad attorney or (2) bad at playing an attorney on the internet. For your sake, I hope it's the latter.

---

Sounds like you're a regular Johnny Cockran.

In a defamation case, please tell me what texts other than those between the player and coach he defamed would be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

In fact, draft a request for production that you believe would get discovery beyond the communications between the defamed coach and the player. (Remember: defamation case)

I'll wait.

---

I hope you didn't wait too long. You are clearly have no clue what you are talking about. I guess you hope that your dumb/cocky tone will make you sound smart. What would the communications between the coach and player have to do with anything in this stupid defamation case you came up with?

Anyways, a ton of texts and communications would be discoverable. Maybe you should look up the defenses to defamation and see if you can come up with any reasons why a ton of texts would be discoverable. That shouldn't be too hard for an internet badass like yourself.

---

Yeah, that's what I thought. You don't know what the **** you're talking about. I'll chalk this up to you biting off more than you can chew.

---

.

I literallly gave you the answer and you are too dumb to realize it. Lol know I remember why I don't come to the zoo often.

---

I'd just quit arguing with this genius. He has no idea. If he thinks only texts between that one player and coach would be discoverable in a defamation case he's clueless. To attempt to prove this was widespread they'd be able to get all the communications they want between players and coaches. But he's a legal genius so we must trust him lol

Absolutely love seeing these former players that never even player for Fisher stand up for the program. Some were here longer than others but obviously realized hard work and the chance to play for Texas A&M was a blessing. Real Ags as opposed to clowns soft pansy clowns like Marchiol. Marchiol obviously committed to a coach not a university.

As predicted, this is already yesterday's news.

With the new transfer rules, I think we will see more of this type of situation in the future where a player throws his former school under the bus to try to get immediate eligibility.

Emilio Fantastico said:

---

beerad12man said:

---

You're a loser

---

I'm beginning to think he was Sumlin's drinking buddy.

---

After JFF and Trill left, he needed someone.

Tex Ag 81 said:

---

With the new transfer rules, I think we will see more of this type of situation in the future where a player throws his former school under the bus to try to get immediate eligibility.

---

I think it depends how the NCAA handles this, also I think it's case by case... we ruffled feathers with the Jimbo hire. Had this been Bama no one would've batted an eye, and the kid wouldn't have gotten this far.

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

Anyone wanting A&M to bring a legal case against Marchiol is an idiot. The last thing we need is give this kids attorneys the right to discovery in our football coaches business and communications.

---

It sounds like you have never been involved in a discovery fight. Discovery is limited to that which is likely to lead to admissible evidence. They don't get to peruse through every document and fighting to get documents is 80% of litigation costs. You think A&M will just willfully give over any and all documents for dude's lawyer to rifle through?

---

I understand completely. Take something simple that wouldn't be limited. You want our coaching staff's text conversations with players being combed through? I sure as hell don't.

---

Only the texts between the coach and Marchiol would be discoverable in a defamation case. All other texts by that coach and any other person would not be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and a protective order would be issued.

---

You are either (1) a bad attorney or (2) bad at playing an attorney on the internet. For your sake, I hope it's the latter.

---

Sounds like you're a regular Johnny Cockran.

In a defamation case, please tell me what texts other than those between the player and coach he defamed would be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

In fact, draft a request for production that you believe would get discovery beyond the communications between the defamed coach and the player. (Remember: defamation case)

I'll wait.

---

I hope you didn't wait too long. You are clearly have no clue what you are talking about. I guess you hope that your dumb/cocky tone will make you sound smart. What would the communications between the coach and player have to do with anything in this stupid defamation case you came up with?

Anyways, a ton of texts and communications would be discoverable. Maybe you should look up the defenses to defamation and see if you can come up with any reasons why a ton of texts would be discoverable. That shouldn't be too hard for an internet badass like yourself.

---

Yeah, that's what I thought. You don't know what the **** you're talking about. I'll chalk this up to you biting off more than you can chew.

---

.

I literallly gave you the answer and you are too dumb to realize it. Lol know I remember why I don't come to the zoo often.

---

And, I literally told you to write the RFP. You either won't because you know it will get destroyed or you can't, so STFU.

---

Gotta love TexAgs. Where else can you go to find threads that on the onset seem to provide good discussion points but then, the longer they get, the more likely they seem to fall to the lowest common theme of name calling and debasing what otherwise would be a great place to share things.

so what was Marichild's point of bringing up the paying for unofficial visits? Is he pretending that created a conflict of interest with his high standard of enforcing NCAA rules or is he just being a petty ***** trying to sling poo?

Gyles Marrett said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

mavsfan4ever said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

99 Luft said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

Anyone wanting A&M to bring a legal case against Marchiol is an idiot. The last thing we need is give this kids attorneys the right to discovery in our football coaches business and communications.

---

It sounds like you have never been involved in a discovery fight. Discovery is limited to that which is likely to lead to admissible evidence. They don't get to peruse through every document and fighting to get documents is 80% of litigation costs. You think A&M will just willfully give over any and all documents for dude's lawyer to rifle through?

---

I understand completely. Take something simple that wouldn't be limited. You want our coaching staff's text conversations with players being combed through? I sure as hell don't.

---

Only the texts between the coach and Marchiol would be discoverable in a defamation case. All other texts by that coach and any other person would not be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and a protective order would be issued.

---

You are either (1) a bad attorney or (2) bad at playing an attorney on the internet. For your sake, I hope it's the latter.

---

Sounds like you're a regular Johnny Cockran.

In a defamation case, please tell me what texts other than those between the player and coach he defamed would be likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

In fact, draft a request for production that you believe would get discovery beyond the communications between the defamed coach and the player. (Remember: defamation case)

I'll wait.

---

I hope you didn't wait too long. You are clearly have no clue what you are talking about. I guess you hope that your dumb/cocky tone will make you sound smart. What would the communications between the coach and player have to do with anything in this stupid defamation case you came up with?

Anyways, a ton of texts and communications would be discoverable. Maybe you should look up the defenses to defamation and see if you can come up with any reasons why a ton of texts would be discoverable. That shouldn't be too hard for an internet badass like yourself.

---

Yeah, that's what I thought. You don't know what the **** you're talking about. I'll chalk this up to you biting off more than you can chew.

---

.

I literallly gave you the answer and you are too dumb to realize it. Lol know I remember why I don't come to the zoo often.

---

I'd just quit arguing with this genius. He has no idea. If he thinks only texts between that one player and coach would be discoverable in a defamation case he's clueless. To attempt to prove this was widespread they'd be able to get all the communications they want between players and coaches. But he's a legal genius so we must trust him lol

---

Then, show me what that request would look like. You and the other guy keep saying that A&M Athletics can never sue anybody because the discovery process would make every person within the AD submit to a body cavity search, and force each of them to provide urine and stool samples. That's plain BS.

What would you ask the AD to produce in a defamation case where the student-athlete alleged that coach gave him money to entertain prospects in an unofficial visit? How would you justify a blanket request to produce all communications from every swinging dick? What would that request look like?

SHOW ME!

And, even if you could justify a mountain of irrelevant communications, that STILL would not be open to the public.

Show me what a defense lawyer would request...if you can.

His lawyer, Tom Mars, is trying to create a sense of an environment out of Santino's control that Santino was uncomfortable with.