Let's get down to the real question.. Why is A&M not as good of a program as an Alabama? Is it the resources? facilities/stadium? alumni support? Student body & fan support? Are they in a better football state/region? I think we can all agree that it's none of these things; A&M is as good if not better than an Alabama in all of these categories.
So then what is it that an Alabama has over A&M? That would be a winning tradition, better coaching, and a culture that promotes winning & doesn't tolerate mediocrity.
That's the difference. If A&M wants to take that step, it's going to start with changing this culture that tolerates mediocrity. Once that happens then the better coaching can come and that will lead to a winning tradition over time.
The Aggie mentality and tradition of being loyal to mediocrity is what's keeping this program from reaching its potential. What A&M lacks is a winning culture. Anyone who defends Sumlin or 8-4 seasons at this point is part of the culture problem.
So then what is it that an Alabama has over A&M? That would be a winning tradition, better coaching, and a culture that promotes winning & doesn't tolerate mediocrity.
That's the difference. If A&M wants to take that step, it's going to start with changing this culture that tolerates mediocrity. Once that happens then the better coaching can come and that will lead to a winning tradition over time.
The Aggie mentality and tradition of being loyal to mediocrity is what's keeping this program from reaching its potential. What A&M lacks is a winning culture. Anyone who defends Sumlin or 8-4 seasons at this point is part of the culture problem.