FWIW..
Mizzou may have crapped in their bed.
SEC is NOT happy that Mizzou cannot keep a lid on their end of things. Unlike TAMU, there are way too many competing agenda's at Mizzou. TAMU was unified in their approach and dealings, including not have leaks daily from inside the administration.
The question being asked now in SEC circles is this.. if Mizzou has issues like this now, will they continue to have such conflicts of interest once they are a full SEC member?
Will there be unnamed Mizziu officials leaking info about confidential SEC agreements?
Right now, it appears that Mizzou is too divided to go much further in the membership process. Unlike TAMU, they are NOT doing the due diligence of the prcess correctly.
Lastly, for whomever posted about FSU.. there is indeed some ongoing talks about that.
As always, my info comes 3rd and 4th hand from contacts I made long ago.
Mizzou may have crapped in their bed.
SEC is NOT happy that Mizzou cannot keep a lid on their end of things. Unlike TAMU, there are way too many competing agenda's at Mizzou. TAMU was unified in their approach and dealings, including not have leaks daily from inside the administration.
The question being asked now in SEC circles is this.. if Mizzou has issues like this now, will they continue to have such conflicts of interest once they are a full SEC member?
Will there be unnamed Mizziu officials leaking info about confidential SEC agreements?
Right now, it appears that Mizzou is too divided to go much further in the membership process. Unlike TAMU, they are NOT doing the due diligence of the prcess correctly.
Lastly, for whomever posted about FSU.. there is indeed some ongoing talks about that.
As always, my info comes 3rd and 4th hand from contacts I made long ago.