Ol Jock 99 said:
Kingston's little b.... ass is tweeting about the slowness to fix traffic lights.
A few years ago, probably 2012-2014 ish, but still under Kingston's watch i believe, City traffic engineers told council they will need 250 million over 10 years to replace existing signals that are well past design life, are obsolete, etc. They got basically zilch.
The City has about 1350 signals. The typical design life is about 20 years though many on the street are well past that right now. In some instances, as you drive under some of the oldest ones, you can look up mast arms you can see daylight where there are rust holes completely through the structural steel.
I don't have exact figures handy but somewhere north of 70% of the 1350 signals are older than 25 years. Signals run $300-$400k now. The City needs to be spending about 20-25 million a year just rebuilding the old signals. Let alone the funding needed to build new signals from the growth in traffic.
- Edit -
Some of my numbers were off - here's the old council briefing.
https://www.scribd.com/document/184608063/Traffic-Signal-System-Upgrade-Needs