Austin
Sponsored by

Just How Unsafe is Austin?

27,378 Views | 287 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by emando2000
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DD88 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Similar to having a full roster with good depth on an athletic team, you are better able to replace the lower performing members when you have adequate staffing.

Austin has dropped from a police staff of 1,800 down to 1,350 (now) down to who knows what after the continuing antagonistic approach from the city council and its obedient deluded progressive voters.


Comparing cops to a sport team is wild. Bad sport players don't get people killed or wrongly put in jail. Bad cops ruin the trust for all the good cops, bad cops cause people to die, bad cops put innocent people in jail. Bad cops are scared of oversight.

I'd rather have 1350 good cops than 1800 cops with 450 of them bad
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:

txags92 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Good luck finding any cops that want to come work in Austin with the DA gunning for them and Prop A poised to release their personnel file to whoever feels like that want to see it.


Let the bad cops go elsewhere….. Don't be ****ty, don't be afraid.

bye Felicia
It is really cute that you think it is all bad cops leaving and you can just replace them so easily. Being desperate to fill 500 positions while fighting the perception that the city and the DA are anti-cop is a bad combination if you are trying to improve your police force.
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

cityagboy said:

txags92 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Good luck finding any cops that want to come work in Austin with the DA gunning for them and Prop A poised to release their personnel file to whoever feels like that want to see it.


Let the bad cops go elsewhere….. Don't be ****ty, don't be afraid.

bye Felicia
It is really cute that you think it is all bad cops leaving and you can just replace them so easily. Being desperate to fill 500 positions while fighting the perception that the city and the DA are anti-cop is a bad combination if you are trying to improve your police force.


There is probably a median where the truth lies but I do think many of those who have left had at the very least crap attitudes.


***also, do you live in Houston or Austin? Or neither?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:

txags92 said:

cityagboy said:

txags92 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Good luck finding any cops that want to come work in Austin with the DA gunning for them and Prop A poised to release their personnel file to whoever feels like that want to see it.


Let the bad cops go elsewhere….. Don't be ****ty, don't be afraid.

bye Felicia
It is really cute that you think it is all bad cops leaving and you can just replace them so easily. Being desperate to fill 500 positions while fighting the perception that the city and the DA are anti-cop is a bad combination if you are trying to improve your police force.


There is probably a median where the truth lies but I do think many of those who have left had at the very least crap attitudes.


***also, do you live in Houston or Austin? Or neither?

Or they had a good record that would allow them to be easily hired elsewhere and got tired of dealing with the crap and being unappreciated. I am good friends with a former HPD cop that retired early a few years ago and moved to Fredericksburg. He had originally planned to work longer at HPD, but the crap support they got from the DA and the catch and release crime policies drove him to retire early and GTFO. He was a good cop with a spotless record and could get a job on any force in the state any time he wanted to apply. But between his pension, some inherited money, and the private security work he can do when he chooses, he has no need to go put himself through that anymore. The folks APD is losing are likely to be in similar situations. You can fool yourself into believing that all the departures are bad cops running from the spotlight, but I would bet that is not more than a handful of the losses.
DD88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Similar to having a full roster with good depth on an athletic team, you are better able to replace the lower performing members when you have adequate staffing.

Austin has dropped from a police staff of 1,800 down to 1,350 (now) down to who knows what after the continuing antagonistic approach from the city council and its obedient deluded progressive voters.


Comparing cops to a sport team is wild. Bad sport players don't get people killed or wrongly put in jail. Bad cops ruin the trust for all the good cops, bad cops cause people to die, bad cops put innocent people in jail. Bad cops are scared of oversight.

I'd rather have 1350 good cops than 1800 cops with 450 of them bad

Wow! Can you back up your claim that Austin had 450 officers who were getting people killed or wrongly charging them?

Many have retired and a good number left with good records for less antagonistic cities.
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

cityagboy said:

txags92 said:

cityagboy said:

txags92 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Good luck finding any cops that want to come work in Austin with the DA gunning for them and Prop A poised to release their personnel file to whoever feels like that want to see it.


Let the bad cops go elsewhere….. Don't be ****ty, don't be afraid.

bye Felicia
It is really cute that you think it is all bad cops leaving and you can just replace them so easily. Being desperate to fill 500 positions while fighting the perception that the city and the DA are anti-cop is a bad combination if you are trying to improve your police force.


There is probably a median where the truth lies but I do think many of those who have left had at the very least crap attitudes.


***also, do you live in Houston or Austin? Or neither?

Or they had a good record that would allow them to be easily hired elsewhere and got tired of dealing with the crap and being unappreciated. I am good friends with a former HPD cop that retired early a few years ago and moved to Fredericksburg. He had originally planned to work longer at HPD, but the crap support they got from the DA and the catch and release crime policies drove him to retire early and GTFO. He was a good cop with a spotless record and could get a job on any force in the state any time he wanted to apply. But between his pension, some inherited money, and the private security work he can do when he chooses, he has no need to go put himself through that anymore. The folks APD is losing are likely to be in similar situations. You can fool yourself into believing that all the departures are bad cops running from the spotlight, but I would bet that is not more than a handful of the losses.


I have friends that are cops, fire fighters and EMS. The gym I work out at is mostly made of those guys (and girls). So you want to use limited examples to explain over 1,000 people? All of the fire fighters think APD has major issues from within. the cops I work out with are a little more mixed but do admit most of the cops lost to "early retirement" mostly never liked austin and didn't live in austin. When APD started to get pressure to hold cops accountable they left.

As I said (although you ignored it) the truth is probably somewhere in the middle
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DD88 said:

cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Similar to having a full roster with good depth on an athletic team, you are better able to replace the lower performing members when you have adequate staffing.

Austin has dropped from a police staff of 1,800 down to 1,350 (now) down to who knows what after the continuing antagonistic approach from the city council and its obedient deluded progressive voters.


Comparing cops to a sport team is wild. Bad sport players don't get people killed or wrongly put in jail. Bad cops ruin the trust for all the good cops, bad cops cause people to die, bad cops put innocent people in jail. Bad cops are scared of oversight.

I'd rather have 1350 good cops than 1800 cops with 450 of them bad

Wow! Can you back up your claim that Austin had 450 officers who were getting people killed or wrongly charging them?

Many have retired and a good number left with good records for less antagonistic cities.


You are smart enough to have the reading comprehension to know that's not what I said. Move along troll.

But I do think many of them were ****ty. Per the cops and fire fighters I work out with.

***I do also find it funny that most of y'all hating on Austin are F16 echo chamber posters who mostly don't live in Austin….
Complete Idiot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Even a good cop could be wary of oversight - who is providing the oversight, what is their criteria, what is their agenda? Oversight sounds good because we assume it is done by competent, rational people who ensure any procedures learned in police training are properly being followed and that if procedure was followed but oversight committee disagrees with the procedure then they change the procedure and don't punish the cop. And if procedure was not followed, then punish the cop in line with the deviation from procedure and it's impact and not to make a political point. So I can understand even a good, procedure following cop being wary of a nebulous "oversight".

But the majority of cops following procedures probably aren't worried because they know they are doing the right things with their heart in the right place.

L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Complete Idiot said:

Even a good cop could be wary of oversight - who is providing the oversight, what is their criteria, what is their agenda? Oversight sounds good because we assume it is done by competent, rational people who ensure any procedures learned in police training are properly being followed and that if procedure was followed but oversight committee disagrees with the procedure then they change the procedure and don't punish the cop. And if procedure was not followed, then punish the cop in line with the deviation from procedure and it's impact and not to make a political point. So I can understand even a good, procedure following cop being wary of a nebulous "oversight".

But the majority of cops following procedures probably aren't worried because they know they are doing the right things with their heart in the right place.




That is a fair and reasonable take
DD88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Similar to having a full roster with good depth on an athletic team, you are better able to replace the lower performing members when you have adequate staffing.

Austin has dropped from a police staff of 1,800 down to 1,350 (now) down to who knows what after the continuing antagonistic approach from the city council and its obedient deluded progressive voters.


Comparing cops to a sport team is wild. Bad sport players don't get people killed or wrongly put in jail. Bad cops ruin the trust for all the good cops, bad cops cause people to die, bad cops put innocent people in jail. Bad cops are scared of oversight.

I'd rather have 1350 good cops than 1800 cops with 450 of them bad

Wow! Can you back up your claim that Austin had 450 officers who were getting people killed or wrongly charging them?

Many have retired and a good number left with good records for less antagonistic cities.


You are smart enough to have the reading comprehension to know that's not what I said. Move along troll.

But I do think many of them were ****ty. Per the cops and fire fighters I work out with.

***I do also find it funny that most of y'all hating on Austin are F16 echo chamber posters who mostly don't live in Austin….


Your attempt at ad hominem only diminishes your case.

I've lived in Austin 30+ years. I had my car stolen from my driveway. I've had my house burglarized. I chased off another car thief from a shopping center parking area.

If one gave you the benefit of the doubt, one could surmise that you didn't mean that 450 cops were causing people to die and putting innocent people in jail, but it's pretty close to what you wrote.
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DD88 said:

cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Similar to having a full roster with good depth on an athletic team, you are better able to replace the lower performing members when you have adequate staffing.

Austin has dropped from a police staff of 1,800 down to 1,350 (now) down to who knows what after the continuing antagonistic approach from the city council and its obedient deluded progressive voters.


Comparing cops to a sport team is wild. Bad sport players don't get people killed or wrongly put in jail. Bad cops ruin the trust for all the good cops, bad cops cause people to die, bad cops put innocent people in jail. Bad cops are scared of oversight.

I'd rather have 1350 good cops than 1800 cops with 450 of them bad

Wow! Can you back up your claim that Austin had 450 officers who were getting people killed or wrongly charging them?

Many have retired and a good number left with good records for less antagonistic cities.


You are smart enough to have the reading comprehension to know that's not what I said. Move along troll.

But I do think many of them were ****ty. Per the cops and fire fighters I work out with.

***I do also find it funny that most of y'all hating on Austin are F16 echo chamber posters who mostly don't live in Austin….


Your attempt at ad hominem only diminishes your case.

I've lived in Austin 30+ years. I had my car stolen from my driveway. I've had my house burglarized. I chased off another car thief from a shopping center parking area.

If one gave you the benefit of the doubt, one could surmise that you didn't mean that 450 cops were causing people to die and putting innocent people in jail, but it's pretty close to what you wrote.


Looking at context isn't ad hominem…. Ad hominem would be spinning to an unrelated topic….

It's not really close to what I wrote, and your response tells me you understand that.

And I'm glad that you live in austin… most that are here trashing it do not… what part of town do you live in. I'm currently a few blocks south of Rundberg and Lamar. We bought our house here about 7 years ago and moved to Austin in 2008. We rented in different parts of the city from 2008 till we bought our current home. Cars get stolen and homes get burglarized everywhere. My good friend just had a car stolen from his driveway in Prosper and my parents had their home burglarized in Georgetown about a year ago… I had some stuff stolen from my car once in austin. And my wife had her car window broken in Austin once….
Martin Cash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:



Be more specific on the drug use. At home? On the street? Weed? Cocaine? Heroine? Meth? Behavior?

If people are doing drugs but leaving others alone then yeah I think cops could use their tax payer time more wisely. Same with them dealing with minor traffic issues and mental health crises and reports on small crime that already happened. Others besides cops can do that stuff. Let cops be more specialized. Cops are spread so far with so little training they aren't experts in anything
Absurd. Do you have any clue as to how impossible this would be and how many additional layers of bureaucracy and expense this would add to an already underfunded department?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:

txags92 said:

cityagboy said:

txags92 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Good luck finding any cops that want to come work in Austin with the DA gunning for them and Prop A poised to release their personnel file to whoever feels like that want to see it.


Let the bad cops go elsewhere….. Don't be ****ty, don't be afraid.

bye Felicia
It is really cute that you think it is all bad cops leaving and you can just replace them so easily. Being desperate to fill 500 positions while fighting the perception that the city and the DA are anti-cop is a bad combination if you are trying to improve your police force.


There is probably a median where the truth lies but I do think many of those who have left had at the very least crap attitudes.


***also, do you live in Houston or Austin? Or neither?

I moved from Houston to Bastrop earlier this year and my wife works in downtown Austin.
emando2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's difficult reading some of these responses. I'm amazed how myopic people are.

I think some of you need to sit down and talke to actual officers. This isn't weeding out bad apples.
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
emando2000 said:

It's difficult reading some of these responses. I'm amazed how myopic people are.

I think some of you need to sit down and talke to actual officers. This isn't weeding out bad apples.


For sure and I do talk to cops at the gym 5 days a week.

I also think it's important to listen to citizens who live in a city to see why they have lost trust in police.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the gray area that is running cops off is that there is no one catch all set of policies and procedures that can capture all of the possible scenarios these men and women have to face every day on the job. So it is easy to sit back and say oh, the citizen review board will just review their actions against the written policies and training. That sounds good on its face and with a fair and impartial review board, most cops would be fine with it. But the perception is that there are a significant number of bomb throwing anti-police activists that will end up on this board with unrestricted access to the personnel files of any officer who has a complaint filed against them, even anonymously.

It is not too hard to picture all the various avenues for abuse and harassment that opens up. Picture some group like Antifa/BLM filing complaints against every officer in APD just to get their rep on the board access to the personnel files. Then they have home addresses, family members/dependents, all their performance reviews, etc. and can choose to magnify any little thing they find into a campaign of harassment against the cops.

If all of policing was black and white, by the book, just consult the relevant policy and go, kind of work, they could fall back on just doing what the book says. But a huge part of what these folks deal with every day is not black and white and is not clear cut and doesn't fit neatly into a written policy. So, they can either sit back and do nothing in those cases for fear of violating an unwritten policy or one that they were never trained on, or they can try to do the right thing and open themselves up to being crucified by whatever member of the review board takes the least favorable view of all police. It takes a different breed for sure to keep going in the face of what cops put up with.
emando2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:

emando2000 said:

It's difficult reading some of these responses. I'm amazed how myopic people are.

I think some of you need to sit down and talke to actual officers. This isn't weeding out bad apples.


For sure and I do talk to cops at the gym 5 days a week.

I also think it's important to listen to citizens who live in a city to see why they have lost trust in police.
Everyone's a victim these days. It's much easier and more popular than just abiding by the law.
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
emando2000 said:

cityagboy said:

emando2000 said:

It's difficult reading some of these responses. I'm amazed how myopic people are.

I think some of you need to sit down and talke to actual officers. This isn't weeding out bad apples.


For sure and I do talk to cops at the gym 5 days a week.

I also think it's important to listen to citizens who live in a city to see why they have lost trust in police.
Everyone's a victim these days. It's much easier and more popular than just abiding by the law.


My point is simple. I agree we need to listen and talk with cops to hear their story. And if that's the case you should also do the same with the people who live in the city in regards to why they have lost trust in cops. If you are willing to do one but not the other, well, that's not going to help solve the problem other than building a case to defend your side….
emando2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:

emando2000 said:

cityagboy said:

emando2000 said:

It's difficult reading some of these responses. I'm amazed how myopic people are.

I think some of you need to sit down and talke to actual officers. This isn't weeding out bad apples.


For sure and I do talk to cops at the gym 5 days a week.

I also think it's important to listen to citizens who live in a city to see why they have lost trust in police.
Everyone's a victim these days. It's much easier and more popular than just abiding by the law.


My point is simple. I agree we need to listen and talk with cops to hear their story. And if that's the case you should also do the same with the people who live in the city in regards to why they have lost trust in cops. If you are willing to do one but not the other, well, that's not going to help solve the problem other than building a case to defend your side….

The only people that I know that do not appreciate an officers presence are offenders. No one likes getting pulled over for speeding but that's not what we're talking about here.

It's easy for me but then again I don't intentionally commit crimes.
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
emando2000 said:

cityagboy said:

emando2000 said:

cityagboy said:

emando2000 said:

It's difficult reading some of these responses. I'm amazed how myopic people are.

I think some of you need to sit down and talke to actual officers. This isn't weeding out bad apples.


For sure and I do talk to cops at the gym 5 days a week.

I also think it's important to listen to citizens who live in a city to see why they have lost trust in police.
Everyone's a victim these days. It's much easier and more popular than just abiding by the law.


My point is simple. I agree we need to listen and talk with cops to hear their story. And if that's the case you should also do the same with the people who live in the city in regards to why they have lost trust in cops. If you are willing to do one but not the other, well, that's not going to help solve the problem other than building a case to defend your side….

The only people that I know that do not appreciate an officers presence are offenders. No one likes getting pulled over for speeding but that's not what we're talking about here.

It's easy for me but then again I don't intentionally commit crimes.


Maybe you should talk to some other people besides those in your circle or F16. There are lots of people that have lost trust in APD who are not out committing crimes.
emando2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
F16? I'm assuming you're referring to politics since that's what seems to be the regular response.

Go look at my profile. I'm not an F16 person.

Please stop with your assumptions. I'm going off my own experience and observations.
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
emando2000 said:

F16? I'm assuming you're referring to politics since that's what seems to be the regular response.

Go look at my profile. I'm not an F16 person.

Please stop with your assumptions. I'm going off my own experience and observations.


Then remove F16 and the rest of my post holds true.

There are MANY people not committing crimes that have had their trust in APD broken

Your profile says you live in austin. I have a group of friends that meets up most Thursdays. All of us are family men who are good Ol' tax paying, law abiding, home owning Austinites. Come have drinks and dinner sometime.
Martin Cash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:





Maybe you should talk to some other people besides those in your circle or F16. There are lots of people that have lost trust in APD who are not out committing crimes.
Correct. They are the apologists for the ones who are committing crimes.
Mulberrywildman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Would you mind explaining how one's posting tendencies are some sort of metric for the veracity of their post?

You really seem to be hung up on that and the F16 bogeyman that weak debaters seem to so often use as a crutch on this message board.

Always amazed at how "F16's" reach can play even into people's discussions of Austin and its policing and crime dynamics. The TexAgs politics board has exceeded the power of Soros and the lizard people in regard to its influence on the world, and how most of the ills seem to be directly associated with it.

Would also love to see your verifiable dataset that supports the people against APD vs those supporting that you claim you know.
DD88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Similar to having a full roster with good depth on an athletic team, you are better able to replace the lower performing members when you have adequate staffing.

Austin has dropped from a police staff of 1,800 down to 1,350 (now) down to who knows what after the continuing antagonistic approach from the city council and its obedient deluded progressive voters.


Comparing cops to a sport team is wild. Bad sport players don't get people killed or wrongly put in jail. Bad cops ruin the trust for all the good cops, bad cops cause people to die, bad cops put innocent people in jail. Bad cops are scared of oversight.

I'd rather have 1350 good cops than 1800 cops with 450 of them bad

Wow! Can you back up your claim that Austin had 450 officers who were getting people killed or wrongly charging them?

Many have retired and a good number left with good records for less antagonistic cities.


You are smart enough to have the reading comprehension to know that's not what I said. Move along troll.

But I do think many of them were ****ty. Per the cops and fire fighters I work out with.

***I do also find it funny that most of y'all hating on Austin are F16 echo chamber posters who mostly don't live in Austin….


Your attempt at ad hominem only diminishes your case.

I've lived in Austin 30+ years. I had my car stolen from my driveway. I've had my house burglarized. I chased off another car thief from a shopping center parking area.

If one gave you the benefit of the doubt, one could surmise that you didn't mean that 450 cops were causing people to die and putting innocent people in jail, but it's pretty close to what you wrote.


Looking at context isn't ad hominem…. Ad hominem would be spinning to an unrelated topic….

It's not really close to what I wrote, and your response tells me you understand that.

And I'm glad that you live in austin… most that are here trashing it do not… what part of town do you live in. I'm currently a few blocks south of Rundberg and Lamar. We bought our house here about 7 years ago and moved to Austin in 2008. We rented in different parts of the city from 2008 till we bought our current home. Cars get stolen and homes get burglarized everywhere. My good friend just had a car stolen from his driveway in Prosper and my parents had their home burglarized in Georgetown about a year ago… I had some stuff stolen from my car once in austin. And my wife had her car window broken in Austin once….

You can always clarify your stance on how many of the 450 cops that are no longer on the Austin police staff that you believe are bad cops that "cause people to die" or " put innocent people in jail". Is it 0? Is it 450? 10%? 90%?

I live just a few miles north of you.

tlepoC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Based on the amount of state troopers and police I've seen today... It's about to be real safe. For the past couple of years I could go months without seeing a single police car on the road. Today I saw at least 15. Same normal route
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well at least we know ChatGPT's opinion on the matter…
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mulberrywildman said:

Would you mind explaining how one's posting tendencies are some sort of metric for the veracity of their post?

You really seem to be hung up on that and the F16 bogeyman that weak debaters seem to so often use as a crutch on this message board.

Always amazed at how "F16's" reach can play even into people's discussions of Austin and its policing and crime dynamics. The TexAgs politics board has exceeded the power of Soros and the lizard people in regard to its influence on the world, and how most of the ills seem to be directly associated with it.

Would also love to see your verifiable dataset that supports the people against APD vs those supporting that you claim you know.


You know what I meant. Don't play dumb. You aren't dumb. This is a board about Austin. So for those that this comment applies to, most who don't live in Austin and are F16 posters are here to troll and not have real discussions about Austin. Those who fall into the category mostly just want to get Austinites worked up…. A few have even admitted it on this thread, and had a few posts deleted from the staff.

I don't know what post you are responding to in regards to a dataset…. Was it a fact I claimed or was it an opinion that I stated? If it was about cops I work out with are you claiming that's not true? If so, just more proof you are here to troll…

F16 is an echo chamber, you also know that. It's not a place for debate, it's a place to cheer people you agree with you on….
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DD88 said:

cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

cityagboy said:

DD88 said:

bankshot11 said:

Maybe we can replace them with cops who actually do their jobs?
Similar to having a full roster with good depth on an athletic team, you are better able to replace the lower performing members when you have adequate staffing.

Austin has dropped from a police staff of 1,800 down to 1,350 (now) down to who knows what after the continuing antagonistic approach from the city council and its obedient deluded progressive voters.


Comparing cops to a sport team is wild. Bad sport players don't get people killed or wrongly put in jail. Bad cops ruin the trust for all the good cops, bad cops cause people to die, bad cops put innocent people in jail. Bad cops are scared of oversight.

I'd rather have 1350 good cops than 1800 cops with 450 of them bad

Wow! Can you back up your claim that Austin had 450 officers who were getting people killed or wrongly charging them?

Many have retired and a good number left with good records for less antagonistic cities.


You are smart enough to have the reading comprehension to know that's not what I said. Move along troll.

But I do think many of them were ****ty. Per the cops and fire fighters I work out with.

***I do also find it funny that most of y'all hating on Austin are F16 echo chamber posters who mostly don't live in Austin….


Your attempt at ad hominem only diminishes your case.

I've lived in Austin 30+ years. I had my car stolen from my driveway. I've had my house burglarized. I chased off another car thief from a shopping center parking area.

If one gave you the benefit of the doubt, one could surmise that you didn't mean that 450 cops were causing people to die and putting innocent people in jail, but it's pretty close to what you wrote.


Looking at context isn't ad hominem…. Ad hominem would be spinning to an unrelated topic….

It's not really close to what I wrote, and your response tells me you understand that.

And I'm glad that you live in austin… most that are here trashing it do not… what part of town do you live in. I'm currently a few blocks south of Rundberg and Lamar. We bought our house here about 7 years ago and moved to Austin in 2008. We rented in different parts of the city from 2008 till we bought our current home. Cars get stolen and homes get burglarized everywhere. My good friend just had a car stolen from his driveway in Prosper and my parents had their home burglarized in Georgetown about a year ago… I had some stuff stolen from my car once in austin. And my wife had her car window broken in Austin once….

You can always clarify your stance on how many of the 450 cops that are no longer on the Austin police staff that you believe are bad cops that "cause people to die" or " put innocent people in jail". Is it 0? Is it 450? 10%? 90%?

I live just a few miles north of you.


I've seen your posts, you are better than that gotcha type post…. Obviously there isn't data on the cops that left saying who was bad and good…. It is an opinion, it is based of cops I work out with and general knowledge of why they left. Yes, I think many cops who left were bad and I'm glad they did.
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Earlier someone predicted that Prop A could lead to the exposure of Austin police identities (did you know that some cartels now use facial recognition?) and here is real world back up for that claim.
Los Angeles is suing a "police accountability group" for "willfully exposing...undercover assignments".

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-blunder-that-is-just-epic-lapd-reels-after-release-of-undercover-identities/ar-AA1aWctV?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=29aae164dd8d43248325889ccfba5c40&ei=42
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why do you work out with them if they're bad? Also, glad those cops serve as a nice anecdote for you about the 450 that left.
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chipotlemonger said:

Why do you work out with them if they're bad? Also, glad those cops serve as a nice anecdote for you about the 450 that left.


I have a wide range of friends and I'm not afraid to hang with different people. Also, as I mentioned, the cops I work out with mostly agree that many cops who left had bad attitudes, didn't like austin and didn't live in austin.
Keeper of The Spirits
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I appreciate you fighting the good fight here but the best strategy is to ignore these types of posts, especially if they go over one page. They will scream about soros, crime and their love of police but never actually engage in substantive discussions outside maybe 1 or 2 like OP_06

We had some luck with getting these flagged and moved to Politics for a while but it seems like the mods gave up because traffic on this board is so limited that they'd rather this be the echo chamber of F16 than a board to discuss Austin. I mean seriously read the OP here, it sounds like the ramblings of your 85 year old grandpa

I'll ttt every other thread like this I can find in 10 mins. You so can see this never stops and if no one responds they eventually go away

Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not going anywhere.

Wouldn't it be great if there was no discussion, and everyone just agreed with whatever the single ruling big city party decided?

Have you ever thought that it could be true that the police in Austin, or Los Angeles, or New York, or Chicago, or any other big city ruled by Socialists could be in need of mass force reduction but that it is a bit suspicious when all these big cities suffer the same problem at the same time?
L7 WEENIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rongagin71 said:

I'm not going anywhere.

Wouldn't it be great if there was no discussion, and everyone just agreed with whatever the single ruling big city party decided?

Have you ever thought that it could be true that the police in Austin, or Los Angeles, or New York, or Chicago, or any other big city ruled by Socialists could be in need of mass force reduction but that it is a bit suspicious when all these big cities suffer the same problem at the same time?


Austin isn't socialist. Stop trolling
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.