Hornbeck said:
So, if 1000 students moved in, there should be property taxes associated with those thousand, as well as other new residents who don't have kids. The new properties are newer, and probably more expensive as well. I don't see where the huge shortfall there is.
Yes, you can bet I'll vote. You guys won't like what I do vote, but I have that right.
I don't think I disagree with (most) of what you said.
It was pointed out that the district budget had increased by 25% over 5 years, and some questioned whether that was appropriate. If asking whether a budget it appropriate, I guess you ask whether the inflow is manageable, and whether the outflow is reasonable.
On the outflow side, I pointed out that the budgeted cost per student in inflation-adjusted dollars has remained level. So no profligate increases in spending, just essentially treading water.
On the inflow side, I was trying to point out that the increased tax revenue comes from a mix of increases on properties that existed five years ago, and new ones added to the rolls. You seem to be saying those new properties should cover *all* increases in the district budget, while I think it is reasonable to additionally expect some tax increases on existing properties that are in line with inflation, which would mean a constant tax bill in inflation-adjusted dollars. I think that's about how our district has managed things over the years.
I was actually encouraging a yes vote on state Proposition 4, which will lead to an increase in the homestead exemption from $40,000 to $100,000. This will give a property tax break for homeowners. I'll be voting yes; are you voting against, and thus for higher taxes? I agree that I wouldn't like that, but yes, you do have the right to vote to keep our taxes at a higher level with no immediate benefit to the schools.
As for the bond proposition vote, I will be voting yes, and I'd like to see all four passed. But I respect that taxes are painful. My main contentions are first that the district has been reasonable in its spending (middle of the road, probably nicer/more facilities than Bryan and the same teacher pay scale, lower teacher pay scale and not as nice of facilities as many other similar suburban districts). Second, our facilities are not in good shape with regard to condition (AMCHS) and capacity relative to student population (both high schools), and improvements are needed. Third, tax increases over the years have hurt, but when inflation is taken into account mine have mainly been reasonable, the state has additionally taken steps to lower property taxes, and the bond isn't going to lead to a big increase. I add that up and I think it's well worth it.
