trouble said:
Me too but it won't happen. BCHD will claim it violates HIPAA.
In some sense, I could understand why they might claim that. While HIPAA restrictions can be lifted under a natural disaster, in the case of the BCS area the numbers are still small enough that they might have a reluctance to provide more info. For example, they currently provide zip code information, age ranges, gender, and ethnicity. When one combines that with info such as Rapier's scanner info and reading the obit columns people may begin to narrow individuals down bit by bit. IIRC, in the past the entity had to prove that harm had occurred but it was changed to prove that harm had
not occurred. Note: I'm not accusing anyone of attempting to 'dox' individuals, but mostly arguing that unintended consequences could arise and BCHD is probably trying to avoid that and perhaps any liability related to that. If another county chooses to provide that information, perhaps they have consulted their counsel, have decided it's in the public's interest, or don't know enough to know the difference.
I tend to view it rather like the Texas education testing data that when aggregated across a district is broken down but occasionally when consulting specific campuses, certain categories cannot be shown because the sample size is very small and easily identifiable. We're not a borough in New York City with thousands in the hospital, so I guess I don't have a problem with it. Our service region has 22 COVID cases in total hospitalized (includes ctys outside of Brazos) and capacity does not seem to be an issue.
I'm washing my hands, wearing a mask if I'm inside a business/working for any length of time, and otherwise doing the usual things I would do to avoid spreading germs to others in our community. YMMV.
Thanks to those listening to the press conferences and also posting the data and info that is out there.