Serious question.trouble said:
Except for the long term care residents, it's often a HUGE pain in the ass to get the MPOA to sign consents. It was one of the more annoying parts of my job when I was running an assisted living.
If an individual has an MPOA, can they still sign for themselves or does it HAVE to be the MPOA? I kind of get the idea of, say an Alzheimer's patient, being incapacitated to the point of not being "competent" enough to consent, but I'd think in most other instances the actual resident/patient could sign of their own accord. No?
Commentary: You would think this situation would illicit a near-immediate response from whoever held the MPOA, right?
-----
Still, there were a couple of weeks of lead time to at least start working this. Are we really at the point that 88% of 1A is:
1) incapable of consent
or
2) Has an MPOA that , somehow, requires another to consent on their behalf, AND, said person who can provide consent is dragging their feet in responding to a request to authorize vaccination for the MOST vulnerable population?
I'm not saying you're wrong by any means, but this is just unfathomable to me. Bordering on criminal negligence on their part.
How much of the remaining 88% do you think are in tis situation based on your experience?