There is no timeline because there is no funding source identified to have the work done.
Gig 'em! '90
wow - what a disaster. I know quite a few people who spend all their weekends at their homes on McQueeny.SanAntoneAg said:
There is no timeline because there is no funding source identified to have the work done.
MouthBQ98 said:
I don't see how they could build dams almost a century ago that were adequate all this dime but now everything has to be ridiculously overly complex expensive to replace those relatively simple structures. Why would these things NEED to be so overly engineered and built?
MAROON said:
they've set up a website to answer some of the questions
https://gvlakes.com/
Alta said:MAROON said:
they've set up a website to answer some of the questions
https://gvlakes.com/
Thanks for posting - interesting information. I'm surprised they are not draining the lakes immediately with what they say about them being such a safety risk. If another dam fails in the next month and a person is injured that is a horrible fact pattern for the river authority.
WhoopN06 said:
What has the GRBA been doing with their revenue over the last 100 years?
Alta said:
You are probably right but I would be shocked if an injunction was granted to stop the draining.
WhoopN06 said:
What has the GRBA been doing with their revenue over the last 100 years?
MouthBQ98 said:
Add public access so the public has an interest in it and maybe some state funds could be allocated?
PFG said:
Money and taxes and prop values and second homes aside...
What happens to all the beautiful cypress trees lining the banks after the water recedes? Do they have a deep enough root system to survive the draw down?