Quote:
Look at that photo and think about it a little longer. Saying they're all 2nd and 3rd generation makes it worse; they are clearly not integrated. The picture says it all, there are no white guys (nor black for that matter) in that group. They prefer their ingroup and don't hang out with other ethnicities. Sure looks likes they're replacing, not integrating
Why are they forced to have token white people interspersed in any of their social outings, and why does anyone keep pretending this is some kind of valid observation? I knew Indian people that went places with other Indian people and then married white people and had children together. Nobody has to make sure they match the racial makeup of the Captain Planet crew before stepping outside.
And then after being told that this wasn't a group of illegal immigrants, it's also goofy to pretend that seeing a photograph of some people and then being like "well, it wasn't even about those kids, it's about some other people that look like them" is a good way to have an immigration discussion or that it isn't insulting to some people that simply decided to watch a football game. It would be like someone writing an article that says "America has a problem with racists" and showing a photo of a white guy. I bet the same people saying the photo is actually about a wider discussion wouldn't brush that off as "well, they could be talking about anyone".
The other thread devolved into people claiming people of Indian descent can't be Americans based on the term's being coined at a time when the US population was 90% white compared to under 60% now and then multiple variations of gatekeeping the racial purity of the word "American". It wasn't a reasoned argument on the legitimacy of more regulated immigration policy, it was people piling on about what they don't like about certain types of other people.
Even if you believe all of those assertions, you would think based on practicality alone that a person running for office in a state as diverse as Texas (under 40% non-Hispanic white) wouldn't want to be the lightning rod for that crowd and their arguments. Especially if you're running for RAILROAD COMMISSIONER. You've taken an elected position that's been solidly Republican and assigned a voting issue to that race that has nothing to do with the responsibilities of the appointment.
Railroad commissioner has been as close to a sure thing as it gets for an election in Texas, and now we have this swirling around. The post is so off most peoples' radar that it may not matter, but why mess with that by finding a way to put it on the radar for reasons that have nothing to do with oil and gas regulation? This kind of clumsy comparison or the repeated assertions on the other thread that "America is for the whites" will eventually get you Democrat politicians, and Democrat politicians will get you more "immigration" like we saw under Biden. I'm guessing a lot of people here don't want that.
Quote:
And to your last point, when these intelligent, hard working Americans climb the ladder and wind up in a position to hire, who do you think they'll prefer? The data is very clear on this, Indians have a massive in-group bias when it comes to hiring. They're going to H1B another 20 of their own, even if they've never been to their homeland
Extrapolating an argument about H1B regulation from a photo of 10 people watching football isn't the best way to get politicians elected that would do anything about that. Just an opinion.