Logos Stick said:
Hey Brazos, I'd like to hear your response to hph's post about tax reduction. Thanks!
Oh sorry. I didn't respond because it's completely irrelevant. If you like lopsided exchanges of massive windfalls in exchange for a pittance reduction in your taxes, then you should be happy and let that be. That county has between two hundred and two hundred fifty (200-250) data centers. So think about how many a county needs to get a ****ty tax break.
Using a county whose total data centers account for barely 5% of the total in the entire united states is like saying 100 people didn't die from the COVID shot so it's good to go.
Folks living in tiny quarter acre lots in my county get 20% increases every single year even though we have a 10% cap, so the ones that are aware of that can go spend 30 minutes in the tax office getting their taxes REDUCED TO THE MAXIMUM INCREASE ALLOWABLE every year. We have new data centers built, many being constructed, and many in the pipeline. Data centers get large tax abatements, and counties use the remaining windfall for upgrades, not tax reduction.
As I said, I wouldn't trade a crappy tax break for the data centers. The example of Loudoun County has about 5% of the total data centers in the entire united states. It is the exception, not the rule. You do you.