shiftyandquick said:
The Democrats best candidate in a generation...
shiftyandquick said:
The Democrats best candidate in a generation...
shiftyandquick said:
The Democrats best candidate in a generation vs the GOP's worst candidate in a generation (maybe ever).
Don't be shocked if the Democrat wins during an off-cycle election with a very unpopular president.
you don't think robert francis was a better candidate? Tell us why talrico is so good? What do you like about him, besides his ministry "man of the cloth" charade possibly being able to fool people into voting for socialism?shiftyandquick said:
The Democrats best candidate in a generation
oh no said:shiftyandquick said:
The Democrats best candidate in a generation
you don't think robert francis was a better candidate? Tell us why talrico is so good? What do you like about him, besides his ministry "man of the cloth" charade possibly being able to fool people into voting for socialism?
shiftyandquick said:
The Democrats best candidate in a generation vs the GOP's worst candidate in a generation (maybe ever).
Don't be shocked if the Democrat wins during an off-cycle election with a very unpopular president.
one thing is for certain: whoever wins' side will proudly and boldly declare the result was obvious in hindsightshiftyandquick said:
The Democrats best candidate in a generation vs the GOP's worst candidate in a generation (maybe ever).
Don't be shocked if the Democrat wins during an off-cycle election with a very unpopular president.
oh no said:
Will a telarcco supporter explain what they like so much about this guy? Why is he the answer?
How are open borders going to help us with "affordability"? How is "equity" and villainizing "whiteness disease" going to work out for our kids and grandchildren?
For someone who votes against holding violent illegals, how is releasing them good for citizens? For someone who votes against banning wealth tax or a state income tax, how does that not lead to socialism?
— Zach Kraft (@ZachKraft7) August 10, 2026
oh no said:
Will a telarcco supporter explain what they like so much about this guy? Why is he the answer?
How are open borders going to help us with "affordability"? How is "equity" and villainizing "whiteness disease" going to work out for our kids and grandchildren?
For someone who votes against holding violent illegals, how is releasing them good for citizens? For someone who votes against banning wealth tax or a state income tax, how does that not lead to socialism?
shiftyandquick said:oh no said:
Will a telarcco supporter explain what they like so much about this guy? Why is he the answer?
How are open borders going to help us with "affordability"? How is "equity" and villainizing "whiteness disease" going to work out for our kids and grandchildren?
For someone who votes against holding violent illegals, how is releasing them good for citizens? For someone who votes against banning wealth tax or a state income tax, how does that not lead to socialism?
If you can't figure out why Talafreako is leading in the polls, why he's a strong candidate....then how are you going to beat him?
Politics 101.
Quote:
Just like Beto?
shiftyandquick said:oh no said:
Will a telarcco supporter explain what they like so much about this guy? Why is he the answer?
How are open borders going to help us with "affordability"? How is "equity" and villainizing "whiteness disease" going to work out for our kids and grandchildren?
For someone who votes against holding violent illegals, how is releasing them good for citizens? For someone who votes against banning wealth tax or a state income tax, how does that not lead to socialism?
If you can't figure out why Talafreako is leading in the polls, why he's a strong candidate....then how are you going to beat him?
Politics 101.
shiftyandquick said:
As far as I'm concerned, Paxton is going to win easily, he can campaign just like he is now and fundraise just he is doing now, and nothing need change. He can essentially sit in a basement if he wants for the next few months and literally coast to victory, because this is Texas. That's all you need to know.
Just incredible that I hadn’t even heard about this yet. She voted against a bill that criminalized adults trying to sexually pursue children.
— AG (@AGHamilton29) August 11, 2026
Dems have themselves a real winner with the DSA candidate in Wisconsin. https://t.co/M0ewQIiHP7
Adultery is one of God's ten Commandments and I would think that would have some importance to Christians. If Paxton can't be trusted in marriage, can he truly be trusted?ts5641 said:oh no said:
Will a telarcco supporter explain what they like so much about this guy? Why is he the answer?
How are open borders going to help us with "affordability"? How is "equity" and villainizing "whiteness disease" going to work out for our kids and grandchildren?
For someone who votes against holding violent illegals, how is releasing them good for citizens? For someone who votes against banning wealth tax or a state income tax, how does that not lead to socialism?
They can't. They typically mention Paxton's adultery as a way to justify voting for talarico. They mention he's a Christian and that Paxton has bad character. By saying these things they're proving they're either incredibly naive or they're just spouting nonsense because they're leftists and want to win.
Canvasback said:Adultery is one of God's ten Commandments and I would think that would have some importance to Christians. If Paxton can't be trusted in marriage, can he truly be trusted?ts5641 said:oh no said:
Will a telarcco supporter explain what they like so much about this guy? Why is he the answer?
How are open borders going to help us with "affordability"? How is "equity" and villainizing "whiteness disease" going to work out for our kids and grandchildren?
For someone who votes against holding violent illegals, how is releasing them good for citizens? For someone who votes against banning wealth tax or a state income tax, how does that not lead to socialism?
They can't. They typically mention Paxton's adultery as a way to justify voting for talarico. They mention he's a Christian and that Paxton has bad character. By saying these things they're proving they're either incredibly naive or they're just spouting nonsense because they're leftists and want to win.
All above board, all free market capitalism. Audited and signed off by board members who did their due diligence. Why are you trying to convince people Paxton did something wrong?
— Steven Cox (@Boomerexistence) August 10, 2026
All people are sinners. You, me, and everyone else posting on this thread. Jesus came to atone for our sins. I am not here to judge any person's heart. Since all candidates are sinners, I therefore must evaluate their policies that best matches my beliefs.Canvasback said:Adultery is one of God's ten Commandments and I would think that would have some importance to Christians. If Paxton can't be trusted in marriage, can he truly be trusted?ts5641 said:oh no said:
Will a telarcco supporter explain what they like so much about this guy? Why is he the answer?
How are open borders going to help us with "affordability"? How is "equity" and villainizing "whiteness disease" going to work out for our kids and grandchildren?
For someone who votes against holding violent illegals, how is releasing them good for citizens? For someone who votes against banning wealth tax or a state income tax, how does that not lead to socialism?
They can't. They typically mention Paxton's adultery as a way to justify voting for talarico. They mention he's a Christian and that Paxton has bad character. By saying these things they're proving they're either incredibly naive or they're just spouting nonsense because they're leftists and want to win.
Yes many Christians have sold their souls to the devil. Trump gave them something they wanted and in response many Christians enabled him to continue with his extremely low character issues. I think many are doing the same thing with Paxton. In times past, a candidate having an affair would be forced to drop out of elections.oh no said:
amazing that Joe Biden and Bill Clinton voters are pretending to be hung up on Paxton's failed marriage.
Trump has had three wives and millions of Christians still voted for him- many three times- because it's socialist regime vs not, mass migration vs not, muslim invasion and pro-hamas vs not. No one is going to convince anti-communists in this two party system to vote for the creepy socialist because Paxton had a girlfriend before his divorce was finalized and I don't think this narrative makes enough people stay home to help socialism win. It's only trolls pretending to be long time holy self righteous Christian repubicans saying they're going to sit this one out, hoping to promote the narrative and get people to sit this one out with them.
I'm still waiting for a twinkrico supporter to explain why their candidate should be the one, instead of just complaining about Paxton's mistress or Paxton's acquittal or Paxton's letter about Texas Tech, or whatever.
Canvasback said:
Adultery is one of God's ten Commandments and I would think that would have some importance to Christians. If Paxton can't be trusted in marriage, can he truly be trusted?