And he contacted students outside of school. I was a teacher and I substitute occasionally so last night was doing my required "safe school" trainings, and it is a a big no no to contact students outside school or be buddies on FB or Twitter. But he loves children, especially the confused ones he can groom ( grooming is considered sexual abuse). So I'm pretty sure he list his teaching job due to the contact outside of school.

Lost his job

Wait, that's why he only taught for two years?

But some lifetime republican voters claimed that it was because his funding was pulled and so he ran for government to "fix the state" of education...not that he inappropriately contacted kids outside of school and online against district policy.

Canvasback said:

---

oh no said:

---

Who bribed who? Why aren't they in prison? Has the FBI looked into it?

---

The original allegations of bribery were brought by his own office staff. This was part of the charges brought against him at his impeachment by the Republican controlled House. The "good ole boy" Republican controlled Senate let him off.

---

And they refused to back up those allegations with testimony when they were put under oath. And the "evidence" they provided to the most partisan US AG in the past 4 decades (Merrick Garland)'s DOJ was so compelling that they did...nothing...they found nothing worth even attempting to prosecute. The "bribery" is a nothing burger that was used by dems hiding in R clothing running the Texas House under Dade Phelan to punish Paxton. There was "good ole boy" collusion that took place, but it was all in the Texas House to ram through the impeachment without testimony under oath by the accusers.

LOL

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

Whoop2 said:

---

And he contacted students outside of school. I was a teacher and I substitute occasionally so last night was doing my required "safe school" trainings, and it is a a big no no to contact students outside school or be buddies on FB or Twitter. But he loves children, especially the confused ones he can groom ( grooming is considered sexual abuse). So I'm pretty sure he list his teaching job due to the contact outside of school.

---

Anyone have a shocked face I can borrow?

Inspired By AOC, James Talarico Also Elects To Have His Eggs Frozen https://t.co/uJN5DlBRzZ

— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) August 10, 2026

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

Still voting R

Thank goodness for Tony Buzbee exposing the Dade Phelan corruption

samurai_science said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

---

It was the Republican dominated House that voted to impeach him and send it to the Senate for trial. I guess the House Republicans believed those "lies".

You must not be paying attention. We know which democrats are responsible. Dade Phelan is one of them.

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

---

It was the Republican dominated House that voted to impeach him and send it to the Senate for trial. I guess the House Republicans believed those "lies".

---

And it was the (thankfully) Republican dominated Senate that voted to overwhelmingly acquit him on all charges. Team Phelan lost.

nortex97 said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

---

It was the Republican dominated House that voted to impeach him and send it to the Senate for trial. I guess the House Republicans believed those "lies".

---

And it was the (thankfully) Republican dominated Senate that voted to overwhelmingly acquit him on all charges. Team Phelan lost.

---

But the state will still have to pay Whistleblowers over $7 million dollars.

K

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

---

It was the Republican dominated House that voted to impeach him and send it to the Senate for trial. I guess the House Republicans believed those "lies".

---

The GOP House was also told there would be plenty of evidence at trial. Remember an impeachment is the equivalent of an indictment. During the trial there simply wasn't any evidence.

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

---

It was the Republican dominated House that voted to impeach him and send it to the Senate for trial. I guess the House Republicans believed those "lies".

---

The same republicans who worked together with democrats to nominate a RINO speaker who was friendly to democrats? Those "republicans"?

Aggie97 said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

---

It was the Republican dominated House that voted to impeach him and send it to the Senate for trial. I guess the House Republicans believed those "lies".

---

And it was the (thankfully) Republican dominated Senate that voted to overwhelmingly acquit him on all charges. Team Phelan lost.

---

But the state will still have to pay Whistleblowers over $7 million dollars.

---

Sometimes you just pay people that are there just to cause trouble to go away.

Ask the US senate about their "metoo" slush fund.

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

---

It was the Republican dominated House that voted to impeach him and send it to the Senate for trial. I guess the House Republicans believed those "lies".

---

Do you have any idea on what the actual "credible" evidence was against Paxton?

Any idea at all?

What did the "whistleblowers" say? What evidence did they have? Who did they hear it from?

Once the lid was lifted off the lid of all the goodies that were promised in the "whistleblower" surprise box, it turned out to be a giant box of nothing.

Before the trial, it was Schrodinger's allegations. You had no idea what was in the box until you opened it, because the contents of the box were hidden behind keeping the "whistleblowers" safe.

The trial opened the box, and the case was DOA, and obviously had been for a long, long time.

"Republicans for Talarico" group unmasked as frauds.

https://t.co/dysgpYxWg7

— Zach Kraft (@ZachKraft7) August 10, 2026

Typical.

nortex97 said:

---

"Republicans for Talarico" group unmasked as frauds.

https://t.co/dysgpYxWg7

— Zach Kraft (@ZachKraft7) August 10, 2026

Typical.

---

Every single time.

Rapier108 said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

"Republicans for Talarico" group unmasked as frauds.

https://t.co/dysgpYxWg7

— Zach Kraft (@ZachKraft7) August 10, 2026

Typical.

---

Every single time.

---

Non-Diddlers for Talarico will go the same way, methinks.

txags92 said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

oh no said:

---

Who bribed who? Why aren't they in prison? Has the FBI looked into it?

---

The original allegations of bribery were brought by his own office staff. This was part of the charges brought against him at his impeachment by the Republican controlled House. The "good ole boy" Republican controlled Senate let him off.

---

And they refused to back up those allegations with testimony when they were put under oath. And the "evidence" they provided to the most partisan US AG in the past 4 decades (Merrick Garland)'s DOJ was so compelling that they did...nothing...they found nothing worth even attempting to prosecute. The "bribery" is a nothing burger that was used by dems hiding in R clothing running the Texas House under Dade Phelan to punish Paxton. There was "good ole boy" collusion that took place, but it was all in the Texas House to ram through the impeachment without testimony under oath by the accusers.

---

This guy is correct. This multi year attack on him was Bush family and their acolytes' attack that almost worked. Except for our Senate, Dan Patrick's courageous leadership and one incredibly lawyer who made the liars answer questions under oath.

Slicer97 said:

---

96 pages and not a single mind changed....

---

It's hilarious to read the comments from the dirty libs trying to defend the freak and CMs not voting for Paxton. This is what I call entertaining mental gymnastics!

Teslag said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

---

It was the Republican dominated House that voted to impeach him and send it to the Senate for trial. I guess the House Republicans believed those "lies".

---

The GOP House was also told there would be plenty of evidence at trial. Remember an impeachment is the equivalent of an indictment. During the trial there simply wasn't any evidence.

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Aggie97 said:

---

Mark Fairchild said:

---

It was not his own staff. Before posting try to get to the "Truth". I know that your ilk is allergic to "Truth". You always resort to hearsay and lies. That's how your side operates.

---

What do you mean they were not on his staff. They worked in the AG's office and are getting over 8 million dollars for being illegally fired.

---

lol

---

LOL
Can't accept facts?

---

I saw the Senate testimony, it's was lies and zero evidence or credibility

---

It was the Republican dominated House that voted to impeach him and send it to the Senate for trial. I guess the House Republicans believed those "lies".

---

A R House that never got to see the evidence or testimony......so your point is still, pointless.

nortex97 said:

---

"Republicans for Talarico" group unmasked as frauds.

https://t.co/dysgpYxWg7

— Zach Kraft (@ZachKraft7) August 10, 2026

Typical.

---

TRX said:

---

Slicer97 said:

---

96 pages and not a single mind changed....

---

It's hilarious to read the comments from the dirty libs trying to defend the freak and CMs not voting for Paxton. This is what I call entertaining mental gymnastics!

---

Sure, Talarico is for open borders, sexual mutilation of minors, bestubbled Prostate-Americans in women's spaces, and the equal treatment of all six (as of today) genders....but Paxton was unfaithful to his wife and was accused of bad things by people who declined to do it under oath.

DD88 said:

---

Byron Cook (see Polo Road Gang - 11 republicans joining democrats to elect Joe Straus speaker in 2009) made the accusation 4 years after(2015) his investment which was after Paxton challenged Straus for Speaker in 2011 and defeated their buddy Dan Branch for AG in 2014.

---

So Paxton dared to challenge Straus for Speaker in 2011 and lost because 11 RINOs joined with Democrats to elect a RINO. Sounds familiar.

Paxton runs for AG and beats the RINO's candidate, Dan Branch, and it infuriates the RINOs. Sounds familiar.

After the election is over, Paxton is attacked by RINO's using lawfare almost from the start.

When all attempts at lawfare were exhausted and had failed, Paxton was impeached by a House on the last day of the session eight years later with RINO leadership telling the Republican caucus to "trust us", the evidence is there.

Impeachment trial, led by real Republicans in the Senate, leads to an aquittal because there was no real evidence when witnesses were examined under oath. Just third hand testimony, hearsay, and innuendo.


Texas RINOs have been after Paxton for over a decade and thought they were rid of him when he decided to run for Cornyn's Senate seat. Paxton beat them again and they are royally ticked, both at a state and now at a national level. Paxton is a fighter that will serve our state well as a Senator. He's been fighting the good fight now for almost 25 years. It's an easy choice this November, especially when you take into account the godless communist the Democrats have run against him.

The Democrats best candidate in a generation vs the GOP's worst candidate in a generation (maybe ever).

Don't be shocked if the Democrat wins during an off-cycle election with a very unpopular president.

shiftyandquick said:

---

The Democrats best candidate in a generation vs the GOP's worst candidate in a generation (maybe ever).

Don't be shocked if the Democrat wins during an off-cycle election with a very unpopular president.

---

26 genders or GTFO.
What's up with just 6?

Fake Republicans. I think it took less than 3 seconds from the time that the POS interview was revealed that posters on this forum pointed out how apparent it was.

shiftyandquick said:

---

The Democrats best candidate in a generation vs the GOP's worst candidate in a generation (maybe ever).

Don't be shocked if the Democrat wins during an off-cycle election with a very unpopular president.

---

Found the democrat copium of the day.

deddog said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

The Democrats best candidate in a generation vs the GOP's worst candidate in a generation (maybe ever).

Don't be shocked if the Democrat wins during an off-cycle election with a very unpopular president.

---

26 genders or GTFO.
What's up with just 6?

---

Remember which gender/sex is trying to do the math...