Paxton vs Talarico [See Staff Note in OP]

648,846 Views | 7924 Replies | Last: 58 sec ago by VaterAg
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

TheEternalOptimist said:

Old McDonald said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Whoop2 said:

Talarico is a heretic person as he twists the Bible saying he's a preacher. False preachers are warned about in the Bible.

Religion doesn't move the needle for me, since no religion on the planet can be proved. Heretic? Pfft. Whatever. Paxton is an irrefutable and unashamed corruption machine.

the political cult of evangelism doesn't tolerate Christians who aren't republicans. calling talarico a heretic is an immune response that's more political than religious.

What we don't tolerate are those who claim to be Christian while endorsing the wholesale slaughter of human beings in the womb OR those who embrace sexual deviancy and redefining the Biblical definition of marriage. You can NOT be a Christian and endorse any of the above. To do so invalidates any claims to Christian faith.

this is what i'm talking about. this is a political argument wearing the thin veneer of a religious one. it's reductive and dogmatic to collapse Christianity to a purity test on abortion and LGBT issues. calling talarico a heretic is nothing more than political virtue signaling for evangelicals.


Purity test? He cant even get in the door to take the test, he's a fake.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science said:

Old McDonald said:

TheEternalOptimist said:

Old McDonald said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Whoop2 said:

Talarico is a heretic person as he twists the Bible saying he's a preacher. False preachers are warned about in the Bible.

Religion doesn't move the needle for me, since no religion on the planet can be proved. Heretic? Pfft. Whatever. Paxton is an irrefutable and unashamed corruption machine.

the political cult of evangelism doesn't tolerate Christians who aren't republicans. calling talarico a heretic is an immune response that's more political than religious.

What we don't tolerate are those who claim to be Christian while endorsing the wholesale slaughter of human beings in the womb OR those who embrace sexual deviancy and redefining the Biblical definition of marriage. You can NOT be a Christian and endorse any of the above. To do so invalidates any claims to Christian faith.

this is what i'm talking about. this is a political argument wearing the thin veneer of a religious one. it's reductive and dogmatic to collapse Christianity to a purity test on abortion and LGBT issues. calling talarico a heretic is nothing more than political virtue signaling for evangelicals.


Purity test? He cant even get in the door to take the test, he's a fake.

Pretty sure he would just use the back door. Gnomsayin...
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

TheEternalOptimist said:

Old McDonald said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Whoop2 said:

Talarico is a heretic person as he twists the Bible saying he's a preacher. False preachers are warned about in the Bible.

Religion doesn't move the needle for me, since no religion on the planet can be proved. Heretic? Pfft. Whatever. Paxton is an irrefutable and unashamed corruption machine.

the political cult of evangelism doesn't tolerate Christians who aren't republicans. calling talarico a heretic is an immune response that's more political than religious.

What we don't tolerate are those who claim to be Christian while endorsing the wholesale slaughter of human beings in the womb OR those who embrace sexual deviancy and redefining the Biblical definition of marriage. You can NOT be a Christian and endorse any of the above. To do so invalidates any claims to Christian faith.

this is what i'm talking about. this is a political argument wearing the thin veneer of a religious one. it's reductive and dogmatic to collapse Christianity to a purity test on abortion and LGBT issues. calling talarico a heretic is nothing more than political virtue signaling for evangelicals.

Abortion and LGBT issues are part of it, but to me the really egregious part is him saying there is more than one path to heaven or that other religions have the same message, just packaged differently. The Bible is exclusive. The message of Christ is welcoming to all, but there is only one way.

"Jesus answered, I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." - John 14:6

Talarico is preaching the opposite. He is a heretic. The creator of the universe tells us the path. Not some charlatan running for political office.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Edit- meant to reply to Old M.

You can criticize Christians against baby killing and child mutilation and praise reverend Talarcco's holiness all you want. How about you defend open borders & mass migration, the disease evil whiteys are spreading, defunding police, climate alarmism, lying about supporting republican tax cuts, everything else this guy panders on about?
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Aggie97 said:

Jbob04 said:

Oh good lord, Paxton isn't losing.


New Fox Poll.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-gop-divisions-shape-texas-senate-race.amp

You can't blame a this on a liberal leaning poll. Paxton better get to work or we will be stuck with a socialist freak.

Fox Polls have been garbage forever, and always make the Democrat look better. And there is no way Abbott is only up by 1 point on someone who few even know exists.

Truly, they'd love for the Democrats to sweep everything in November so they can then go back to their preferred position, that of the "loyal opposition".

This is the correct answer to why Fox polls are crap. Polls are for raising money "See, I'm within a point of Abbott. Send me more money". This race is going to be a blow out.

As for Paxton, he needs to mend fences with the rinos (Cornyn primarily) because they are butt hurt at the moment (as we see here). He has at least started campaigning in various cities.
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:



Fake Christian just keeps faking

Someone needs to ask this howdy doody looking con artist "what is the point of even believing in Christ"? "What is the point of Christ to begin with"?

I've been begging for someone to ask him that. His head would explode. I sincerely do not believe he would be able to answer it without twisting himself in nots, because, ultimately the goal with just about every statement he ever utters is to just spit out a bunch of generic feel-good BS to appeal to the dumb useful idiot brigade. Absolutely terrified of ever offending a brown person, LGBTQ zealot, or people of other religions.

Everything I have seen him say minimizes Christ and his relevance. It's almost the worst form of blasphemy I can think of tbh. The Bible warns that false teachers and imposters like this will be held accountable more harshly than the average human.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:



This is why they know Texas is red. No need to campaign in swanky, liberal Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard if you're getting money from here. You know, from the actual people who the senator would represent. And I should add those islands are basically composed of all white populations, except for the servant class.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's not risky to hitck his wagon to Trump in this state. He won by double digits in 2024. Wasn't it like 14%.
Whoop2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No it's not. As a Christian I can't vote for a heretic false preacher. Whether I'm political or not!
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This Spain invasion is giving Paxton's team yet more campaign ad fodder. Show any of the videos of the invasion by these military aged males destroying homes and looting stores and then cut to Talarico's interview where he said that our southern border should have a welcome mat out front.
https://i.imgur.com/iX1gPs5.gif
sanangelo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's PAC finally coming to the rescue of Paxton. I will add that Paxton likely would have defeated Cornyn with or without the endorsement. But nice of Trump's people to give Paxton some money (not $400 mil, I believe that's how much MAGA Inc has for all campaigns).

San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/
Aglaw97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Flagged for trolling
Aglaw97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sanangelo said:

Trump's PAC finally coming to the rescue of Paxton. I will add that Paxton likely would have defeated Cornyn with or without the endorsement. But nice of Trump's people to give Paxton some money (not $400 mil, I believe that's how much MAGA Inc has for all campaigns).



Karl Rove and all the Cornyn acolytes must be beside themselves
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:

It's not risky to hitck his wagon to Trump in this state. He won by double digits in 2024. Wasn't it like 14%.
unfortunately for paxton, it isn't 2024 anymore
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

TAMU1990 said:

It's not risky to hitck his wagon to Trump in this state. He won by double digits in 2024. Wasn't it like 14%.
unfortunately for paxton, it isn't 2024 anymore


Two years isn't enough to go flip 14%. Not even close. Why do you do this to yourself?
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

calling talarico a heretic is nothing more than political virtue signaling for evangelicals.
But you referring to any Christian right of center as "cult of evangelicalism" isn't political virtue signaling? Of course it is, and you know it is...you're just upset that people don't like your candidate of choice.

At least Talarico critics have presented actual evidence in this thread of him talking about his religious beliefs that do not align with basic Christian doctrine.

You on the other hand have done nothing but shout insults at anyone that dare question him while echoing the same platitudes about Paxton and Trump being bad.

Yet you act like you're some kind of morally superior authority on this thread, when you're the exact opposite.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

Old McDonald said:

TAMU1990 said:

It's not risky to hitck his wagon to Trump in this state. He won by double digits in 2024. Wasn't it like 14%.
unfortunately for paxton, it isn't 2024 anymore


Two years isn't enough to go flip 14%. Not even close. Why do you do this to yourself?
did i say it would flip?
1939
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paxton is going to lose if he won't campaign and lets Jimmy set the fake narrative. His ads need to start now.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

Teslag said:

Old McDonald said:

TAMU1990 said:

It's not risky to hitck his wagon to Trump in this state. He won by double digits in 2024. Wasn't it like 14%.
unfortunately for paxton, it isn't 2024 anymore


Two years isn't enough to go flip 14%. Not even close. Why do you do this to yourself?
did i say it would flip?


Saying it's remotely close is just as ridiculous
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's your definition of "close"?

I'm Gipper
Whoop2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is campaigning.
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whoop2 said:

He is campaigning.

And he's stopped with the stupid name calling and will focus on his policies and positions. GOOD
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Two years is enough to flip or turn away a bunch of Trump voters? What do you think they are thinking? "Hey the news says tariffs are bad. Let's try communism instead!" Or is it, "hey the news says the deportations I voted for are bad. Let's vote for open borders guy this time!"
sanangelo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's right, ya know?
San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sanangelo said:

He's right, ya know?



You want that. Doesnt mean he's right.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

sanangelo said:

He's right, ya know?



You want that. Doesnt mean he's right.

It's just the latest post from the Talarico campaign, pretending to be from a non-partisan journalist.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Satan supporting his minion, Talarico where ever he goes.
sanangelo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

TAMUallen said:

sanangelo said:

He's right, ya know?



You want that. Doesnt mean he's right.

It's just the latest post from the Talarico campaign, pretending to be from a non-partisan journalist.


He just joined Daily Wire after departing American Spectator and Fox News. He's married to John McCain's daughter, so there's that.
San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

Old McDonald said:

Teslag said:

Old McDonald said:

TAMU1990 said:

It's not risky to hitck his wagon to Trump in this state. He won by double digits in 2024. Wasn't it like 14%.
unfortunately for paxton, it isn't 2024 anymore


Two years isn't enough to go flip 14%. Not even close. Why do you do this to yourself?
did i say it would flip?


Saying it's remotely close is just as ridiculous
saying it's close is less ridiculous at this stage than saying it's a blowout paxton win. polls and prediction markets have the race even, slightly tilted paxton's way. the congressional generic ballot was R+3 in 2024; as it stands it's looking like it'll be in the neighborhood of D+5-7 this cycle.

i'm on record stating i believe paxton wins, albeit closer than the allred and hegar races. haven't seen anything to change my mind on that yet.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Checks date… notes election is not today.

Dismisses poll saying "if election was today…".

T-Free-ko has spent $3 million on advertising. Man***** Paxton has spent $29k. Poll probablys asks "over the past two weeks, based on what you have seem from T or P, if the elections were held today, who do yoi think would win?"
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gigem314 said:

Old McDonald said:

calling talarico a heretic is nothing more than political virtue signaling for evangelicals.
But you referring to any Christian right of center as "cult of evangelicalism" isn't political virtue signaling? Of course it is, and you know it is...you're just upset that people don't like your candidate of choice.

At least Talarico critics have presented actual evidence in this thread of him talking about his religious beliefs that do not align with basic Christian doctrine.

You on the other hand have done nothing but shout insults at anyone that dare question him while echoing the same platitudes about Paxton and Trump being bad.

Yet you act like you're some kind of morally superior authority on this thread, when you're the exact opposite.
that would have been virtue signaling had i done that, but i did not. evangelicals don't even comprise a majority of right-of-center Christians.

accusations of talarico's pluralistic views being heretical i understand. on the other counts, it's mostly just hyperbole and evangelical dogma which is hard to take seriously.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

TheEternalOptimist said:

Old McDonald said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Whoop2 said:

Talarico is a heretic person as he twists the Bible saying he's a preacher. False preachers are warned about in the Bible.

Religion doesn't move the needle for me, since no religion on the planet can be proved. Heretic? Pfft. Whatever. Paxton is an irrefutable and unashamed corruption machine.

the political cult of evangelism doesn't tolerate Christians who aren't republicans. calling talarico a heretic is an immune response that's more political than religious.

What we don't tolerate are those who claim to be Christian while endorsing the wholesale slaughter of human beings in the womb OR those who embrace sexual deviancy and redefining the Biblical definition of marriage. You can NOT be a Christian and endorse any of the above. To do so invalidates any claims to Christian faith.

this is what i'm talking about. this is a political argument wearing the thin veneer of a religious one. it's reductive and dogmatic to collapse Christianity to a purity test on abortion and LGBT issues. calling talarico a heretic is nothing more than political virtue signaling for evangelicals.

Yes. It is quite simple to condemn Democrats that believe it's the states right to force abortion on minors and genitally mutilate children.

But continue to judge Christians you don't know or understand.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

samurai_science said:

Old McDonald said:

TheEternalOptimist said:

Old McDonald said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Whoop2 said:

Talarico is a heretic person as he twists the Bible saying he's a preacher. False preachers are warned about in the Bible.

Religion doesn't move the needle for me, since no religion on the planet can be proved. Heretic? Pfft. Whatever. Paxton is an irrefutable and unashamed corruption machine.

the political cult of evangelism doesn't tolerate Christians who aren't republicans. calling talarico a heretic is an immune response that's more political than religious.

What we don't tolerate are those who claim to be Christian while endorsing the wholesale slaughter of human beings in the womb OR those who embrace sexual deviancy and redefining the Biblical definition of marriage. You can NOT be a Christian and endorse any of the above. To do so invalidates any claims to Christian faith.

this is what i'm talking about. this is a political argument wearing the thin veneer of a religious one. it's reductive and dogmatic to collapse Christianity to a purity test on abortion and LGBT issues. calling talarico a heretic is nothing more than political virtue signaling for evangelicals.


Purity test? He cant even get in the door to take the test, he's a fake.

Pretty sure he would just use the back door. Gnomsayin...

And complete the test with marblecake.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kill your babies because it's in the bible since mary had a choice to have Jesus.

When will you explain support for open borders, DEI since being white is spreading an infection, defunding police, climate alarmism, etc?

Why is communism going to be good for us and work here?
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our Father has six genders, I hate Christianity and learned more from Islam.

W.T.F.
First Page Last Page
Page 85 of 227 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.