Who cares? They voted for this.
Thaddeus73 said:
H20 in Texas is a problem, and these things require a lot!
Principal Uncertainty said:jpb1999 said:Principal Uncertainty said:TAMUallen said:
Data centers are going to be such an issue for electricity grids
Most maga-size data centers are installing their own generation and not even connecting to any grid. But many mid-size ones are, so point is partially valid. Also, with the new high-powered severs being liquid cooled, they will just use a heat exchanger to a cooling tower. So, no refrigerated chiller and fin-fan coolers. The cooling towers will use much less electricity (for the cooling, not the chip power), so it's by far the cheaper way to go. But evaporative cooling does consume water, so in dry place like west Texas where cheap fuel gas exists wil, indeed, need to manage the water consumption.
Most are going to a closed loop system with little water use.
No, they are not. Closed loop chilling for the building envelope, but future servers will have liquid immersion for cooling with plate and frame heat exchangers directly to an evaporative cooling tower. They are in the prototype stage now, but will be the future of compute.
Hank the Grifter said:Deputy Travis Junior said:
I don't understand the tension. Our country is gigantic. Plenty of room for data centers and farm land.
When you realize that these "data centers" are actually domestic espionage centers, you'll begin to understand the tension.
Deputy Travis Junior said:
I don't understand the tension. Our country is gigantic. Plenty of room for data centers and farm land.
Ozzy Osbourne said:
Lots of toilet flushes for the H1B workers that man these data centers
.flown-the-coop said:Ozzy Osbourne said:
Lots of toilet flushes for the H1B workers that man these data centers
Jokes on you! h1-Bs don't flush.
Ozzy Osbourne said:
Data centers are the new 5G for the tinfoil hat squad
flown-the-coop said:Ozzy Osbourne said:
Lots of toilet flushes for the H1B workers that man these data centers
Jokes on you! h1-Bs don't flush.
Thaddeus73 said:
I think I agree....
Martels Hammer said:
Sulphur Springs TX is getting, I am told, the largest pending build of a new center. And their city budget, by memory, will go from $6M to something like $400M.
So I would assume the people in Sulphur will be pretty happy.
Edit
I "hear" the city is saying the residents will not longer have to pay for garbage etc. I will believe that when I see it but come on, free garbage people.
Ag_07 said:
This whole data center dilemma is BS.
I don't want farmland and open spaces taken up by anything. Data center or subdivision or skyscraper or parking lot.
It's just something to scream and bltch about when in reality it's just an inevitable result of technological advancement and progression.
Queso1 said:
This reminds me of my law school's building. It was constructed decades ago a certain way in order to hold computers. The massive computers needed to process whatever data weighed tens of thousands of pounds. I'm now posting with a phone with exponentially more processing power.
I think these things will be obsolete in 10 years and nobody will clean them up. Just another blight on our country's landscape.
BrazosDog02 said:
Don't blame me. I'm unapologetically completely anti progress. If I could push a button and send my county back to 1948, ship out everyone that moved here that's not an original founding family, I'd smash that button so fast I'd probably break every bone from my fingers to my shoulder….which would be a pain since there aren't hospitals where I am in 1948. But I'd roll those dice anyway.
A1_Ag_95 said:Thaddeus73 said:
H20 in Texas is a problem, and these things require a lot!
If a closed loop system water usage is not an issue.
Queso1 said:
This reminds me of my law school's building. It was constructed decades ago a certain way in order to hold computers. The massive computers needed to process whatever data weighed tens of thousands of pounds. I'm now posting with a phone with exponentially more processing power.
I think these things will be obsolete in 10 years and nobody will clean them up. Just another blight on our country's landscape.
lb3 said:
We bulldoze prairies a hundred square miles at a time for tract homes, build mile long industrial warehouses by the thousands, and have poured enough concrete and asphalt to cover the entire state of Arizona, but you draw the line at data centers?
Rolling back the clock 25 years to when Arizona started getting popular for Data Centers, the other reasons besides cheap land and few restrictions are that Arizona is mostly free from natural disasters -jja79 said:
I see them going up everywhere in Arizona. Today my surprise I saw an interview with a developer in this space say one reason they're building so many here is the state is the only one with a 100 year water plan. Don't know if that's true but I found it interesting.
dmart90 said:A1_Ag_95 said:Thaddeus73 said:
H20 in Texas is a problem, and these things require a lot!
If a closed loop system water usage is not an issue.
How many gallons are needed to create that "closed loop system"? I don't know about you, but I depend on groundwater. I don't need more slimeballs siphoning off that water.
jpb1999 said:Principal Uncertainty said:TAMUallen said:
Data centers are going to be such an issue for electricity grids
Most maga-size data centers are installing their own generation and not even connecting to any grid. But many mid-size ones are, so point is partially valid. Also, with the new high-powered severs being liquid cooled, they will just use a heat exchanger to a cooling tower. So, no refrigerated chiller and fin-fan coolers. The cooling towers will use much less electricity (for the cooling, not the chip power), so it's by far the cheaper way to go. But evaporative cooling does consume water, so in dry place like west Texas where cheap fuel gas exists wil, indeed, need to manage the water consumption.
Most are going to a closed loop system with little water use.
YouBet said:lb3 said:
We bulldoze prairies a hundred square miles at a time for tract homes, build mile long industrial warehouses by the thousands, and have poured enough concrete and asphalt to cover the entire state of Arizona, but you draw the line at data centers?
Do those other examples have the drain on resources that data centers have? Specifically water and electric plus the apparent noise they put off.
agracer said:jpb1999 said:Principal Uncertainty said:TAMUallen said:
Data centers are going to be such an issue for electricity grids
Most maga-size data centers are installing their own generation and not even connecting to any grid. But many mid-size ones are, so point is partially valid. Also, with the new high-powered severs being liquid cooled, they will just use a heat exchanger to a cooling tower. So, no refrigerated chiller and fin-fan coolers. The cooling towers will use much less electricity (for the cooling, not the chip power), so it's by far the cheaper way to go. But evaporative cooling does consume water, so in dry place like west Texas where cheap fuel gas exists wil, indeed, need to manage the water consumption.
Most are going to a closed loop system with little water use.
but require more electricity.
lb3 said:
We bulldoze prairies a hundred square miles at a time for tract homes, build mile long industrial warehouses by the thousands, and have poured enough concrete and asphalt to cover the entire state of Arizona, but you draw the line at data centers?
Urban Country Boy said:agracer said:jpb1999 said:Principal Uncertainty said:TAMUallen said:
Data centers are going to be such an issue for electricity grids
Most maga-size data centers are installing their own generation and not even connecting to any grid. But many mid-size ones are, so point is partially valid. Also, with the new high-powered severs being liquid cooled, they will just use a heat exchanger to a cooling tower. So, no refrigerated chiller and fin-fan coolers. The cooling towers will use much less electricity (for the cooling, not the chip power), so it's by far the cheaper way to go. But evaporative cooling does consume water, so in dry place like west Texas where cheap fuel gas exists wil, indeed, need to manage the water consumption.
Most are going to a closed loop system with little water use.
but require more electricity.
Please explain.
EclipseAg said:lb3 said:
We bulldoze prairies a hundred square miles at a time for tract homes, build mile long industrial warehouses by the thousands, and have poured enough concrete and asphalt to cover the entire state of Arizona, but you draw the line at data centers?
I was gonna say ... if the land isn't used for a data center, before long it will become subdivisions for third-worlders, complete with strip centers housing nail salons, vape shops, Wal-Marts, etc.
Coates said:Principal Uncertainty said:jpb1999 said:Principal Uncertainty said:TAMUallen said:
Data centers are going to be such an issue for electricity grids
Most maga-size data centers are installing their own generation and not even connecting to any grid. But many mid-size ones are, so point is partially valid. Also, with the new high-powered severs being liquid cooled, they will just use a heat exchanger to a cooling tower. So, no refrigerated chiller and fin-fan coolers. The cooling towers will use much less electricity (for the cooling, not the chip power), so it's by far the cheaper way to go. But evaporative cooling does consume water, so in dry place like west Texas where cheap fuel gas exists wil, indeed, need to manage the water consumption.
Most are going to a closed loop system with little water use.
No, they are not. Closed loop chilling for the building envelope, but future servers will have liquid immersion for cooling with plate and frame heat exchangers directly to an evaporative cooling tower. They are in the prototype stage now, but will be the future of compute.
Liquid immersion has been the 'future' for at least a decade and is way past the prototype stage, this has not and will likely not be widespread adopted anytime soon.
ETA that if a user went liquid immersion there is absolutely no water needed, it would use a specialized fluid.