Im Gipper said:Quote:
The witness in this case may actually be the contractor
It's a National Park Service official.
Where was this?Quote:
Pirro admonishes the DOJ as they should have come to this conclusion.
Essentially the same, but admittedly i did not catch that detail. I was differentiating it was jot a third party.
And i said clearly that Pirro admonishes the DOJ as appears appropriate. Even if the had hard evidence on Hearn pulling on the already damaged liner, it should have been clear his actions, whilst deplorable, would not be criminal nor civil.
