Massie is worse than John McCain

66,484 Views | 1372 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by OPAG
IDaggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MASSIE lost!!!! It's a bloodbath.... It's currently 90% chance of Ed winning just 30 minutes after the polls closed.
DeepETX_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

DeepETX_Aggie said:

txags92 said:

Those community notes are just as misleading. If the bill funded ICE and he voted against it, then he voted against funding ICE. That is a factual statement. Whether his stated reason for voting against it was the inclusion of funding for CISA doesn't change the fact that he voted against a bill that would have funded ICE. Sometimes you can't get everything you want as a politician, and you have to compromise. Massie seems to only be willing to compromise when it comes to working with democrats who he shares funding sources with.

another lie.

Where did I say he voted with them 99% of the time? I said he was only willing to compromise with them. There is a difference that you apparently are too involved in defending him to understand. He votes with the Rs about the same as the average R house rep., but when it counts and you have to take some good with the bad, he will be there standing with the Ds.
You said he's only willing to compromise to working with DEMOCRATS. Which isn't true because when a DEMOCRAT was in office he voted with him on 1.8% of the time, the lowest in the House. Doesn't seem like he was compromising much.
SociallyConditionedAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

You should try reading the thread or my previously replies.

I have. It seems that you have issue with him holding onto his conservative principles. I wish we had 435 of him in the House.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SociallyConditionedAg said:

flown-the-coop said:

You should try reading the thread or my previously replies.

I have. It seems that you have issue with him holding onto his conservative principles. I wish we had 435 of him in the House.
I don't. And as of tonight neither do the people of Kentucky-04.

So long Massie. Get back to your Chinese solar panels and harassing women!
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like he can run as an L or Independent. Good for him, be free Massie! Be free!
IDaggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SociallyConditionedAg said:

flown-the-coop said:

You should try reading the thread or my previously replies.

I have. It seems that you have issue with him holding onto his conservative principles. I wish we had 435 of him in the House.

"Conservative principles" please...is that why all the liberals want him to win?
FlyRod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Primarying incumbents because they oppose human trafficking. Just…wow.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlyRod said:

Primarying incumbents because they oppose human trafficking. Just…wow.


Stop being a troll.

I'm Gipper
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, I never heard complaint about Massie until the Epstein stuff. Maybe they were out there but never heard them

ETA: or MTG.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Queso1 said:

Well, I never heard complaint about Massie until the Epstein stuff. Maybe they were out there but never heard them

ETA: or MTG.

OBBB.

But why not. It's all an Epstein coverup. Maybe start a thread for that?!
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Haha Massie is a madman.

To be clear- they are going to try and gaslight you to thinking this is all happening because he went against Trump. In actual reality, Massie went against the Israel lobby and that is why there is this campaign to take him out.
Texaguser17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Got primaried because he opposed AIPAC. The entire maga coalition is opposed him because of it. Goes to demonstrate who runs "maga".

Massie's political mistake was aligning with the far leftists to "fight" back.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texaguser17 said:

Got primaried because he opposed AIPAC. The entire maga coalition is opposed him because of it. Goes to demonstrate who runs "maga".

Massie's political mistake was aligning with the far leftists to "fight" back.

He put a target on himself all the way back when he famously told Tucker that all our politicians have "aipac handlers". This is information you are not supposed to be aware of.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Queso1 said:

Well, I never heard complaint about Massie until the Epstein stuff. Maybe they were out there but never heard them

ETA: or MTG.



Then you haven't paid attention. It are being dishonest. Based on posting history, the latter.


First time Trump called out Massie:


Quote:

Congressman" Thomas Massie voted to delay the Debt Ceiling Bill from the Biden Administration to the Trump Administration (from September before the Election, to June after the Election!), without getting anything for this horrendously stupid move When Republicans could have gotten EVERYTHING they wanted. He additionally voted to delay the current Budget Disaster from the Biden Administration to the Trump Administration. I was running for Office at the time, doing my thing, and when I heard about this, it was, quite simply, hard to believe A catastrophic mistake! Now, and virtually on every other vote, he's a very simple, "NO." He can't even approve a Continuing Resolution when he approved them many times during his career as a "Congressman." Thomas Massie is a GRANDSTANDER, and the Great People of Kentucky are going to be watching a very interesting Primary in the not too distant future!

I'm Gipper
Texaguser17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

Texaguser17 said:

Got primaried because he opposed AIPAC. The entire maga coalition is opposed him because of it. Goes to demonstrate who runs "maga".

Massie's political mistake was aligning with the far leftists to "fight" back.

He put a target on himself all the way back when he famously told Tucker that all our politicians have "aipac handlers". This is information you are not supposed to be aware of.


Who's to say. But money talks. This fiasco has proven what matters above any other political issue. Don't question AIPAC.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:



Haha Massie is a madman.

To be clear- they are going to try and gaslight you to thinking this is all happening because he went against Trump. In actual reality, Massie went against the Israel lobby and that is why there is this campaign to take him out.

He has plenty of friends in the antisemitic movement these days.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texaguser17 said:

Keyno said:

Texaguser17 said:

Got primaried because he opposed AIPAC. The entire maga coalition is opposed him because of it. Goes to demonstrate who runs "maga".

Massie's political mistake was aligning with the far leftists to "fight" back.

He put a target on himself all the way back when he famously told Tucker that all our politicians have "aipac handlers". This is information you are not supposed to be aware of.


Who's to say. But money talks. This fiasco has proven what matters above any other political issue. Don't question AIPAC.

No, it's that disloyalty walks… the plank.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeepETX_Aggie said:

txags92 said:

DeepETX_Aggie said:

txags92 said:

Those community notes are just as misleading. If the bill funded ICE and he voted against it, then he voted against funding ICE. That is a factual statement. Whether his stated reason for voting against it was the inclusion of funding for CISA doesn't change the fact that he voted against a bill that would have funded ICE. Sometimes you can't get everything you want as a politician, and you have to compromise. Massie seems to only be willing to compromise when it comes to working with democrats who he shares funding sources with.

another lie.

Where did I say he voted with them 99% of the time? I said he was only willing to compromise with them. There is a difference that you apparently are too involved in defending him to understand. He votes with the Rs about the same as the average R house rep., but when it counts and you have to take some good with the bad, he will be there standing with the Ds.
You said he's only willing to compromise to working with DEMOCRATS. Which isn't true because when a DEMOCRAT was in office he voted with him on 1.8% of the time, the lowest in the House. Doesn't seem like he was compromising much.


Interesting that you keep reaching back to when we had a dem president and nothing the house passed was going to happen anyways. Look at where he has reached across the aisle to work with them (and accept donations from the same people funding them) since Trump had taken office and it tells a different story… And please stop quoting vote percentages. 90% of the votes the house takes are completely meaningless to the endpoint of either sides agenda. You can vote 90% republican, but if all the key votes you side with dems, the. You are worthless to the conservative agenda and should be primaried out.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texaguser17 said:

Got primaried because he opposed AIPAC. The entire maga coalition is opposed him because of it. Goes to demonstrate who runs "maga".

Massie's political mistake was aligning with the far leftists to "fight" back.

Who were they fighting?
DeepETX_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are you referring to when he worked across the isle to get the Epstein files released?? How dare he!!
Texaguser17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Trump Massie beef started during Covid when opposed the Covid response bill for endless money printing and indemnifying Congress and the entire medical apparatus to push mRNA "vaccines".

All hail or else it seems for Trump.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texaguser17 said:

The Trump Massie beef started during Covid when opposed the Covid response bill for endless money printing and indemnifying Congress and the entire medical apparatus to push mRNA "vaccines".

All hail or else it seems for Trump.

We have been told all day it was Epstein.

You guys have to get your stories right.

Such a champion of all causes that are against the grain. So brave to be a man who says nay and accomplishes nothing.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Texaguser17 said:

Keyno said:

Texaguser17 said:

Got primaried because he opposed AIPAC. The entire maga coalition is opposed him because of it. Goes to demonstrate who runs "maga".

Massie's political mistake was aligning with the far leftists to "fight" back.

He put a target on himself all the way back when he famously told Tucker that all our politicians have "aipac handlers". This is information you are not supposed to be aware of.


Who's to say. But money talks. This fiasco has proven what matters above any other political issue. Don't question AIPAC.

No, it's that disloyalty walks… the plank.

Disloyalty? To who? Trump? The GOP? I thought Massie worked for Kentucky. The Trump/GOP partisanship is wild
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kentucky fired him. Either way he's a loser.

And yes disloyalty to Trump and the GOP. He took R money and R votes then partied with the Ds, including their support of the State of Hamas.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funny how all the "rock ribbed libertarian conservatives" supporting Massie pivot directly to anti-israel talking points when his conservative district picks somebody else instead of him. Can't be that politics is a team game and he had no idea how to be a team player and still work towards the things that were important to him. Nope, "It was the Joos!"
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

Funny how all the "rock ribbed libertarian conservatives" supporting Massie pivot directly to anti-israel talking points when his conservative district picks somebody else instead of him. Can't be that politics is a team game and he had no idea how to be a team player and still work towards the things that were important to him. Nope, "It was the Joos!"

Anti Israel is antisemitic. Don't let anyone slink away from that. You cannot separate the Israel from the Jew. It's in the Declaration of Independence, their name, and reaffirmed by their people.

Would be like someone saying their weren't racist they just didn't like people of color.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep, had nothing to do with him abandoning his party in order to fight Trump over hurt feelings.

It's always those damn meddling Jews!

You really should give this up.
Farmer_J
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Massie probably would have been safe if he wouldn't have came out with the Epstein charade and standing next to democrats for the cameras. Everyone saw through it.

Every day, Republican voters see dirty tricks by Democrats. We want candidates who will fight not always have an excuse. If the new guy doesn't fight, we'll replace him too.

Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:



Funny how you don't seem to care about how many millions endless leftist and communist groups poured into Massie's campaign, but take nuclear level issue with the fact that Jewish people decided to support Gallrein.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Over_ed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Massie losing (relatively) big with 13% of votes in.

Couldn't happen to a nicer guy!




Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Yep, had nothing to do with him abandoning his party in order to fight Trump over hurt feelings.

It's always those damn meddling Jews!

You really should give this up.

AIPAC, Miriam Adelson, and the Republican Jewish Coalition actually don't care about Massie going against Trump on domestic policy (well maybe besides the Epstein stuff). Their interests are more "foreign"
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He got primaried because he's a democrat obstructionist and a liar.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.