Tex100 said:

---

What's the benefit of the multi party property lie (was it 5 instead of 4 or vice versa)?

---

5 units would have required a commercial loan, 4 can be done with a residential loan. I'm sure she didn't know this when she wrote it wrong in multiple places.

“When powerful people cheat to get better loans, it comes at the expense of hardworking people.

Everyday Americans cannot lie to a bank to get a mortgage, and if they did, our government would throw the book at them.

There simply cannot be different rules for different people.”… pic.twitter.com/t1pp0elzLY

— Stella X (@stellaaaaaax) October 11, 2025

Whoopsie.

"White collar financial crime is not a victimless crime."

She said it herself. pic.twitter.com/v1WIB53dsf

— Lorrie Ann 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇸 (@LorrieAnn25) October 11, 2025

jacketman03 said:

---

Okay, I must admit error. I thought the indictment was about the house she helped her niece buy in 2023, but it appears that the indictment is actually regarding a different house in Norfolk that she bought in 2020.

So I was wrong last night, mea culpa, etc

---

Glad you learned something.

Good god. Our country has made career prosecutors out of career criminals. https://t.co/CfT1DUsqyh

— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) October 13, 2025

Must Watch! You won't see this guy on CNN!
Every single mortgage document Letitia James signed over the last 42 years had "falsified information" this was not a "one-off" pic.twitter.com/SuU4CNoQZJ

— Vince Langman (@LangmanVince) October 12, 2025

Mortgage fraud is either really serious or not a big deal, it all depends on if it's Trump people being charged or Letitia James.

This is CNN. pic.twitter.com/UtV0GQrU9M

— MAZE (@mazemoore) October 10, 2025

captkirk said:

---

Mortgage fraud is either really serious or not a big deal, it all depends on if it's Trump people being charged or Letitia James.

This is CNN. pic.twitter.com/UtV0GQrU9M

— MAZE (@mazemoore) October 10, 2025

---

The media are your enemy and should be treated as such.

ts5641 said:

---

The media are your enemy and should be treated as such.

---

EXACTLY!

Someone should have told Halligan that simple truth.

This is incredible. Just incredible. https://t.co/q3gc2uncPU pic.twitter.com/qxt7IRzJCs

— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@ReichlinMelnick) October 20, 2025

Amateur hour over there.

Note: this won't be relevant to the charges against James. But come on people!'

Prosecutor who resisted bringing charges against NY AG was fired after allegations she sent case info to her personal email | CNN Politics https://t.co/UxbDZ7cZwu

— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) October 24, 2025

I saw this comment on one of the stories online.

As a retired banker, I would like to be on this jury. Only questions that matter are:

1. Did you, on your mortgage application, check the box indicating that this property would serve as your residence ( either primary or secondary)?

2. If you did check the box indicating residency, did you ever, at any time, rent this property to a tenant or tenants?

If the answers are both YES, then guilty as charged.

It's really a simple case when broken down.

Mortgage applications clearly state the penalties for lying to a Federally Insured Lender.

annie88 said:

---

I saw this comment on one of the stories online.

As a retired banker, I would like to be on this jury. Only questions that matter are:

1. Did you, on your mortgage application, check the box indicating that this property would serve as your residence ( either primary or secondary)?

2. If you did check the box indicating residency, did you ever, at any time, rent this property to a tenant or tenants?

If the answers are both YES, then guilty as charged.
It's really a simple case when broken down.

Mortgage applications clearly state the penalties for lying to a Federally Insured Lender.

---

And that has teeth. James should consider herself lucky thus far. They could have piled on the charges, if they wanted to do so.

Mortgage applications clearly state the penalties for lying to a Federally Insured Lender.

And that has teeth. James should consider herself lucky thus far. They could have piled on the charges, if they wanted to do so.

I think she'll just get a slap on the wrist. I really hope they fire her, but I don't see that happening. I'm not sure what the rules are about having her position if she's found guilty. I would think they would fire her. But I've seen some weird stuff going down the last few years.

This woman literally portrayed herself as a martyr that was going to take down Trump and I think she really believed it. I find it rather amusing that this is turned around on her.

Of course she's going to play the black woman angle which has nothing to do with it although they like to push the rich white man angle. Massive hypocrite.

Halligan tried to play the Michael Scott "I declare bankruptcy!!!" game, and it went swimmingly for her.

aggiehawg said:

---

annie88 said:

---

I saw this comment on one of the stories online.

As a retired banker, I would like to be on this jury. Only questions that matter are:

1. Did you, on your mortgage application, check the box indicating that this property would serve as your residence ( either primary or secondary)?

2. If you did check the box indicating residency, did you ever, at any time, rent this property to a tenant or tenants?

If the answers are both YES, then guilty as charged.
It's really a simple case when broken down.

Mortgage applications clearly state the penalties for lying to a Federally Insured Lender.

---

And that has teeth. James should consider herself lucky thus far. They could have piled on the charges, if they wanted to do so.

---

Stack charges like the Dems. Count every letter in her signature as a separate charge.

12 FELONIES!!!!!!!

Adding

So now we learn that Beth Yusi, the Virginia prosecutor who fought against charging Letitia James, was fired for allegedly emailing investigative files about James to her personal account.

Let that sink in.
The same prosecutor who wrote the “no evidence” memo somehow had so much…

— Sam E. Antar (@SamAntar) October 25, 2025

JUST IN: Unusual filing in Tish James case. DOJ says it isn't complying with judge's order to turn over discovery on selective prosecution issue. Usual procedure would be move to reconsider the order but prosecutors file 'notice' telling judge no. Doc: https://t.co/QdAyOeTXRG

— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) November 4, 2025

This guy was on Megyn Kelly yesterday and said this is a slam dunk on several charges even in a liberal court.