Tish James Indicted

15,453 Views | 158 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Danny Vermin
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Joseydog • 5:14p, 10/9/25
Joseydog said:
Tex100 said:
Joseydog said:
Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

. Like knowing where you live?


Her niece, who she co-signed for, was going to live in Norfolk and the property was her primary residence. Peace Out

She perpetrated fraud on the mortgage company. Much different than the BS cases against Trump in New York. Complete bull*****
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:14p, 10/9/25
Peace out.
Reply Quote
dreyOO
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fasthorse05 • 5:15p, 10/9/25
fasthorse05 said:
Quote:


Hilarious pull.

She's about to find out she's one of those "everyday Americans"
Reply Quote
TexasAggie_97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fasthorse05 • 5:26p, 10/9/25
fasthorse05 said:
Quote:




You almost can't make this **** up. It's like Democrats accusing people of doing the very things they're doing who would've thought.
Reply Quote
Joseydog
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teslag • 5:26p, 10/9/25
Teslag said:
Joseydog said:
Juan Lee Pettimore said:
Joseydog said:
fasthorse05 said:
Joseydog said:
Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

I always get a kick out of "intent" when our fellow communists get indicted.

Secondly, most assume an attorney representing NYC could think critically. That being the case, she should be able to remember the type of mortgage she was applying for, and not just one mortgage.

I also wonder how many, of the hundreds of plaintiffs in this country who've been indicted for the exact same crime were convicted using the law as you stated. I support it, I'd just like to see the record.

Most of our crooked Dems (I know, same thing) will have no problem with James' crimes. It's either a law or it isn't.


DOJ rarely charges for this absent some other compelling reason.


Seems like we've seen this before…


Yes- Hunter Biden


She lied on a loan application to get favorable terms.

Refresh my memory, what did she charge Trump for?


Her charges against Trump were BS. If his name wasn't Trump, then the charges would never have occurred. If her name wasn't Trish James, then the DOJ would never have charged her.
Reply Quote
Teslag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Joseydog • 5:27p, 10/9/25
So you're saying "what goes around comes around"?
Reply Quote
rwtxag83
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fasthorse05 • 5:39p, 10/9/25
fasthorse05 said:
Quote:


BRILLIANT!!
Greater love hath no man than this....
Reply Quote
bobbranco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Joseydog • 5:44p, 10/9/25
Joseydog said:
Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

She did not know her rate would be lower by claiming it was the primary residence?

I know you think we are stupid but c'mon man.
Reply Quote
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:45p, 10/9/25
Pretty sure listing your father as your spouse should also meet the threshold for mens rea as well
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Reply Quote
Prosperdick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:45p, 10/9/25
Reply Quote
jacketman03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bobbranco • 5:47p, 10/9/25
bobbranco said:
Joseydog said:
Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

She did not know her rate would be lower by claiming it was the primary residence?

I know you think we are stupid but c'mon man.


And what about the emails where she explicitly stated that it wasn't going to be her primary home? That would seem to defeat any intent element for this crime.
Reply Quote
jacketman03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Dirty_Mike&the_boys • 5:49p, 10/9/25
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:
Pretty sure listing your father as your spouse should also meet the threshold for mens rea as well

But what if she signed a deed on the same day clearly stating that she was not her father's spouse? Which time was she lying and doing frauds?
Reply Quote
bobbranco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 5:49p, 10/9/25
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
Joseydog said:
Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

She did not know her rate would be lower by claiming it was the primary residence?

I know you think we are stupid but c'mon man.


And what about the emails where she explicitly stated that it wasn't going to be her primary home? That would seem to defeat any intent element for this crime.

Then the simple solution would have been to fill out the form accurately. If she emailed the underwriter you may have a better argument.
Reply Quote
1 edit
jacketman03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bobbranco • 5:51p, 10/9/25
bobbranco said:
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
Joseydog said:
Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

She did not know her rate would be lower by claiming it was the primary residence?

I know you think we are stupid but c'mon man.


And what about the emails where she explicitly stated that it wasn't going to be her primary home? That would seem to defeat any intent element for this crime.

Then the simple solution would have been to fill out the form accurately. If she email the underwriter you may have a better argument.


Oh, you mean like on the loan application she filled out after the POA where she stated it was not going to be her primary residence?
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:54p, 10/9/25
Reply Quote
bobbranco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 5:57p, 10/9/25
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
Joseydog said:
Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

She did not know her rate would be lower by claiming it was the primary residence?

I know you think we are stupid but c'mon man.


And what about the emails where she explicitly stated that it wasn't going to be her primary home? That would seem to defeat any intent element for this crime.

Then the simple solution would have been to fill out the form accurately. If she email the underwriter you may have a better argument.


Oh, you mean like on the loan application she filled out after the POA where she stated it was not going to be her primary residence?

Is she the sole borrower?
Reply Quote
jacketman03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bobbranco • 6:00p, 10/9/25
bobbranco said:
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
Joseydog said:
Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

She did not know her rate would be lower by claiming it was the primary residence?

I know you think we are stupid but c'mon man.


And what about the emails where she explicitly stated that it wasn't going to be her primary home? That would seem to defeat any intent element for this crime.

Then the simple solution would have been to fill out the form accurately. If she email the underwriter you may have a better argument.


Oh, you mean like on the loan application she filled out after the POA where she stated it was not going to be her primary residence?

Is she the sole borrower?


No, she was a co-borrower on a house her niece bought, and her niece subsequently used it as her primary residence.
Reply Quote
bobbranco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 6:02p, 10/9/25
That's what her lying lawyer claims.

Will find out when the truth comes out in court.
Reply Quote
jacketman03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bobbranco • 6:04p, 10/9/25
bobbranco said:
That's what her lying lawyer claims.

Will find out when the truth comes out in court.


And the lying US Attorney is also making a lot of claims.

See, I can call lawyers liars just as well as you.
Reply Quote
Psycho Bunny
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:07p, 10/9/25
Lawyers lie next at 6.
When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.
Reply Quote
bobbranco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:07p, 10/9/25
White knights in action tonight.
Reply Quote
bobbranco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Psycho Bunny • 6:09p, 10/9/25
Psycho Bunny said:
Lawyers lie next at 6.

Prosecutors that lie do not fare well.

Defense lawyers are paid quite well to lie.

Now remind me who's the better lawyer liar?
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bobbranco • 6:10p, 10/9/25
Quote:
Prosecutors that lie do not fare well.


Know how I know you don't know many prosecutors?

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
bobbranco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 6:12p, 10/9/25
Im Gipper said:
Quote:
Prosecutors that lie do not fare well.


Know how I know you don't know many prosecutors?

Never said they don't lie.

ETA. If I want somebody to craft a lie it would be a criminal defense attorney.
Reply Quote
1 edit
sharpdressedman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fasthorse05 • 6:14p, 10/9/25
She shot herself in the head, not the foot.
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:41p, 10/9/25
Womp womp womp


I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Joseydog • 6:49p, 10/9/25
Joseydog said:
Her charges against Trump were BS. If his name wasn't Trump, then the charges would never have occurred. If her name wasn't Trish James, then the DOJ would never have charged her.
And now she get to pay for her misdeeds. She ****ed around.
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 6:51p, 10/9/25
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
That's what her lying lawyer claims.

Will find out when the truth comes out in court.


And the lying US Attorney is also making a lot of claims.

See, I can call lawyers liars just as well as you.
Where have you been? Where were you when she was persecuting Trump?

**** that fat *****.
Reply Quote
Biz Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4stringAg • 6:53p, 10/9/25
4stringAg said:
Remember to your lib friends who try to say this is Trump targeting political enemies: It was Letitia James that RAN and won on getting Trump.


They also conveniently leave out the part about a jury deciding her guilt or innocence, not Donald Trump. In a court where a Biden appointed judge presides.
Reply Quote
1 edit
MelvinUdall
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 6:56p, 10/9/25
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
That's what her lying lawyer claims.

Will find out when the truth comes out in court.


And the lying US Attorney is also making a lot of claims.

See, I can call lawyers liars just as well as you.


The hypocrisy with you is YUGE!
Reply Quote
jacketman03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MelvinUdall • 7:00p, 10/9/25
MelvinUdall said:
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
That's what her lying lawyer claims.

Will find out when the truth comes out in court.


And the lying US Attorney is also making a lot of claims.

See, I can call lawyers liars just as well as you.


The hypocrisy with you is YUGE!


Am indictment is an allegation that a government attorney got 12 of the 16-23 members of the grand jury to sign off on without needing to include any evidence that shows why the government attorney might be wrong or misleading them.

This case will have discovery and then a jury trial, where we'll find out if the US Attorney or James's lawyer are telling the more fabulous story
Reply Quote
MelvinUdall
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 7:01p, 10/9/25
jacketman03 said:
MelvinUdall said:
jacketman03 said:
bobbranco said:
That's what her lying lawyer claims.

Will find out when the truth comes out in court.


And the lying US Attorney is also making a lot of claims.

See, I can call lawyers liars just as well as you.


The hypocrisy with you is YUGE!


Am indictment is an allegation that a government attorney got 12 of the 16-23 members of the grand jury to sign off on without needing to include any evidence that shows why the government attorney might be wrong or misleading them.

This case will have discovery and then a jury trial, where we'll find out if the US Attorney or James's lawyer are telling the more fabulous story


K
Reply Quote
Iraq2xVeteran
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:02p, 10/9/25
This is great news. I am glad the DOJ has indicted Leticia James because she became New York Attorney General by campaigning on targeting President Trump.
Reply Quote
4
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Dirty_Mike&the_boys • 7:10p, 10/9/25
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:
Pretty sure listing your father as your spouse should also meet the threshold for mens rea as well

Unless, of course, it's true
Reply Quote
AggieVictor10
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MadDog73 • 7:16p, 10/9/25
MadDog73 said:
Now do Schiff!


Schiff is next. Trump included him in his tantrum post on TS.
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.