Grand jury asked to indict Letitia James: MSNBC

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) October 9, 2025

Came here to post this.

Good news. I want to see her perp walked and mug shots.

Was she indicted or were they asked to indict her? Me thinks those are different.

Now do Schiff!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-indicted-on-fraud-charge-ap-source-says/ar-AA1OaBx5?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Quote:

---

A grand jury has indicted New York Attorney General Letitia James on a fraud charge, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press on Thursday.

James was indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia on one count after a mortgage fraud investigation, said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.

---

Look how fake news reports it:

[Do not create posts about other users on the forums. When users enter into a thread discussion you are welcome to engage their arguments about the subject of the thread. -Staff]

No one is above the law right libs? They should be rushing over here to encourage full enforcement of the law. Any minute now.



Annnnyyyyyy minute.

aggiepanic95 said:

---

Was she indicted or were they asked to indict her? Me thinks those are different.

---

AP is reporting actual indictment.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/virginia-prosecutor-asks-grand-jury-200704656.html

The wording of other news articles make it less clear. However, I don't think they'd use the term, indictment, at all unless there actually was one. How would the report know the prosecutor was "seeking" one unless they were told, and that gets problematic for the Justice Department.

This really does seem like an open & shut case from the little bit I have read!

[Do not create posts about other users on the forum. When users enter into a thread discussion you are welcome to engage their arguments about the subject of the thread. -Staff]

No corruption on the left. None at all.

[Do not create posts about other users on the forum. When users enter into a thread discussion you are welcome to engage their arguments about the subject of the thread. -Staff]

[Do not create posts about other users on the forum. When users enter into a thread discussion you are welcome to engage their arguments about the subject of the thread. -Staff]

Great news. The left is so corrupt.

Keep it going, there's many more who need jail time!

Talking points aren't out until 6:15pm EST.

Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

Ms. Big Mac will be here soon to drive by and say this is just Trump being petty.

Joseydog said:

---

Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

---

I always get a kick out of "intent" when our fellow communists get indicted.

Secondly, most assume an attorney representing NYC could think critically. That being the case, she should be able to remember the type of mortgage she was applying for, and not just one mortgage.

I also wonder how many, of the hundreds of plaintiffs in this country who've been indicted for the exact same crime were convicted using the law as you stated. I support it, I'd just like to see the record.

Most of our crooked Dems (I know, same thing) will have no problem with James' crimes. It's either a law or it isn't.

Joseydog said:

---

Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

---

. Like knowing where you live?

Remember to your lib friends who try to say this is Trump targeting political enemies: It was Letitia James that RAN and won on getting Trump.

Tex100 said:

---

Joseydog said:

---

Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

---

. Like knowing where you live?

---

Her niece, who she co-signed for, was going to live in Norfolk and the property was her primary residence. Peace Out

fasthorse05 said:

---

Joseydog said:

---

Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

---

I always get a kick out of "intent" when our fellow communists get indicted.

Secondly, most assume an attorney representing NYC could think critically. That being the case, she should be able to remember the type of mortgage she was applying for, and not just one mortgage.

I also wonder how many, of the hundreds of plaintiffs in this country who've been indicted for the exact same crime were convicted using the law as you stated. I support it, I'd just like to see the record.

Most of our crooked Dems (I know, same thing) will have no problem with James' crimes. It's either a law or it isn't.

---

DOJ rarely charges for this absent some other compelling reason.

Joseydog said:

---

fasthorse05 said:

---

Joseydog said:

---

Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

---

I always get a kick out of "intent" when our fellow communists get indicted.

Secondly, most assume an attorney representing NYC could think critically. That being the case, she should be able to remember the type of mortgage she was applying for, and not just one mortgage.

I also wonder how many, of the hundreds of plaintiffs in this country who've been indicted for the exact same crime were convicted using the law as you stated. I support it, I'd just like to see the record.

Most of our crooked Dems (I know, same thing) will have no problem with James' crimes. It's either a law or it isn't.

---

DOJ rarely charges for this absent some other compelling reason.

---

Seems like we've seen this before…

Juan Lee Pettimore said:

---

Joseydog said:

---

fasthorse05 said:

---

Joseydog said:

---

Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

---

I always get a kick out of "intent" when our fellow communists get indicted.

Secondly, most assume an attorney representing NYC could think critically. That being the case, she should be able to remember the type of mortgage she was applying for, and not just one mortgage.

I also wonder how many, of the hundreds of plaintiffs in this country who've been indicted for the exact same crime were convicted using the law as you stated. I support it, I'd just like to see the record.

Most of our crooked Dems (I know, same thing) will have no problem with James' crimes. It's either a law or it isn't.

---

DOJ rarely charges for this absent some other compelling reason.

---

Seems like we've seen this before…

---

Yes- Hunter Biden

See, I have no clue about the indictment rate.

It's kind of a shame to even have the law. The humorous part to me is most politicians are desperate for our money. If your statement is true, there's likely several hundred thousand dollars waiting to be collected due to ignorance or malice aforethought.

I always remember that we have 300,000 laws on the books in DC. If they want ANY of us, they'll figure out a way to get us.

Quote:

---

O what tangled webs we weave When first we practice to deceive.

---

How hard can it be? She either signed these multiple docs claiming homestead or she didn't.

Joseydog said:

---

Juan Lee Pettimore said:

---

Joseydog said:

---

fasthorse05 said:

---

Joseydog said:

---

Talking points (and legal analysis) were already out.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/next-up--letitia-james

BTW: Federal mortgage fraud requires the DOJ to prove intent to defraud

---

I always get a kick out of "intent" when our fellow communists get indicted.

Secondly, most assume an attorney representing NYC could think critically. That being the case, she should be able to remember the type of mortgage she was applying for, and not just one mortgage.

I also wonder how many, of the hundreds of plaintiffs in this country who've been indicted for the exact same crime were convicted using the law as you stated. I support it, I'd just like to see the record.

Most of our crooked Dems (I know, same thing) will have no problem with James' crimes. It's either a law or it isn't.

---

DOJ rarely charges for this absent some other compelling reason.

---

Seems like we've seen this before…

---

Yes- Hunter Biden

---

She lied on a loan application to get favorable terms.

Refresh my memory, what did she charge Trump for?

Joseydog said:

---

DOJ rarely charges for this absent some other compelling reason.

---

JWinTX said:

---

Ms. Big Mac will be here soon to drive by and say this is just Trump being petty.

---

LOL someone lives in your head.

Quote:

---

When powerful people cheat to get better loans, it comes at the expense of hardworking people.

Everyday Americans cannot lie to a bank to get a mortgage, and if they did, our government would throw the book at them.

There simply cannot be different rules for different people.

— NY AG James (@NewYorkStateAG) February 16, 2024

---