Make DC Safe Again

51,755 Views | 544 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by will25u
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

Rockdoc said:

You've got a political party in the dems that want the ship to go down and I guess they want to go down with it. All because they were voted out and lost power. You can't reason with them and no use trying.


What ship is going down? We're discussing police militarization for a fake emergency.

"Our border is secure." -- Liars who ET supported, less than four years ago.

Fake emergency, indeed. D.C. is a crime-riddled ****hole and an embarrassment to people who love America. We don't want it to be like San Francisco.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DCAggie13y said:


I've lived in the DC area for the past 17 years. Things got significantly worse here after COVID. I believe homicides more than doubled from 116 in 2017 to 274 in 2023. The homeless population also exploded. They are everywhere now and we have large encampments in public parks which I did not see from 2008-2020.

It may also be true that crime is down marginally from the peak in 2023 but that year was historically awful with some crimes like carjacking increasing by 10x compared to pre COVID.

And I think the teens who dropped out of school permanently during the COVID school shutdowns are the biggest driver. I have a friend who is a DC cop who said they arrest the teens but the DA does not prosecute them for anything less than murder or attempted murder. All other charges are dropped and they are released the same day, even after they are arrested.

The police in DC are pissed that people they arrest face no consequences and they have stopped arresting teens for most crimes since it is pointless.

The situation in DC is as bad as it gets.

This should be the EOT. It's explains in reality what everyone that isn't humping the Democrat's leg already knew. Their gaslighting is obnoxious, and everyone with a brain knows the games they are playing.

There are some posters on this thread that should just hang it up for a while and call it a day.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Quote:

A crowd rental company has seen a massive uptick in inquiries regarding its services in Washington, D.C., amid President Donald Trump's move to federalize the police force in the nation's capital.

"Right now, D.C. inquiries are up roughly 400% compared to the same period in 2024," Crowds on Demand CEO Adam Swart told Fox News Digital, adding that the time period he is referencing is May to July 2024.

The company always sees a spike in requests during what Swart calls "high-stakes political moments."

"A large share are focused on opposing Trump's policies in Washington and raising alarms about government overreach," Swart said. "We're weighing those offers carefully because while there's truth in saying D.C.'s local government has been an abject failure in keeping citizens safe, there's also a real danger in putting too much power in federal hands. That balance of power matters."

Swart said the "vast majority" of people at political or advocacy events in D.C. are in some way paid.

"Most people don't know this, but many protesters are literally on the payroll Capitol Hill staffers from both parties are often expected to show up at rallies and protests on their own time," he said. "So yes, most attendees are being paid or are there because it's part of their job. That doesn't mean they don't support the cause but it does mean these crowds aren't as 'organic' as they appear on TV."

https://www.foxnews.com/us/dc-paid-protester-requests-surge-amid-trumps-federal-takeover-city-police-crowd-company
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SIAP.


Sounds like paradise, right?
SgtBarbarossa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who beat them in homicide rate? Detroit / Memphis / Baltimore?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The chief is a moron dei hire, we see this everywhere, LA, new orleans, pick a city.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SgtBarbarossa said:

Who beat them in homicide rate? Detroit / Memphis / Baltimore?

IIRC, it is Memphis, St. Louis, and Baltimore.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:



Quote:

A crowd rental company has seen a massive uptick in inquiries regarding its services in Washington, D.C., amid President Donald Trump's move to federalize the police force in the nation's capital.

"Right now, D.C. inquiries are up roughly 400% compared to the same period in 2024," Crowds on Demand CEO Adam Swart told Fox News Digital, adding that the time period he is referencing is May to July 2024.

The company always sees a spike in requests during what Swart calls "high-stakes political moments."

"A large share are focused on opposing Trump's policies in Washington and raising alarms about government overreach," Swart said. "We're weighing those offers carefully because while there's truth in saying D.C.'s local government has been an abject failure in keeping citizens safe, there's also a real danger in putting too much power in federal hands. That balance of power matters."

Swart said the "vast majority" of people at political or advocacy events in D.C. are in some way paid.

"Most people don't know this, but many protesters are literally on the payroll Capitol Hill staffers from both parties are often expected to show up at rallies and protests on their own time," he said. "So yes, most attendees are being paid or are there because it's part of their job. That doesn't mean they don't support the cause but it does mean these crowds aren't as 'organic' as they appear on TV."

https://www.foxnews.com/us/dc-paid-protester-requests-surge-amid-trumps-federal-takeover-city-police-crowd-company

Some posters from this thread might want to "volunteer".
Please protest to make sure that we don't get a military dictatorship.
And you will enjoy DC, very safe city.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



So close.
"Why is Georgetown campus safer than other parts of DC? There's no officers there."
Yes lady, you're almost there. Do tell us why?

Her answer "We need to rethink what safety is for black americans"
WTF.

These people are mental.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:







What in the living hell?! This is the bottom you get when you go full DEI.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:




Shell probably be fired.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Those 70 businesses must have missed the big drop in crime somehow.

Just getting started:
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a bingo.

It's hilarious, until one ponders how many people have been harmed/injured/killed as a result of such idiotic hiring practices to lead/manage/run a critical police force.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAG 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The outrage proves that Trump could cure cancer and the left would hate him for it.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Democratic logic. Police do not make streets safer for Black Americans. So by that logic the Black Americans are the criminals, whose criminal activity is no longer safe to practice. Racist!
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the dems want the criminals to run free
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:







They should be wearing masks. The libs will be outing them and threatening them and their families.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
amazingly DC was MUCH worse in 1995

when policemen were shot to death in their patrol cars.

I should have bought 4 buildings in Logan Circle instead of going to law school- they are worth millions now.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DC late 1960s


Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One of the best quotes about DC I heard yesterday from one of the FNC news babes.

She said saying crime is down in DC is like saying I was 600 lbs and now I'm 500.
K2-HMFIC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nm
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

nortex97 said:

blacksox said:

I am interested to see to crime statistics that would warrant a sudden federal takeover. I have a strong feeling they do not exist as violent crime rates have been dropping for decades now in big cities. I suspect this is just more buttering up the public to Trump's abuses of federal power,

What crime statistics would be of interest?

I am interested in what crime data would be supportive of 'let's just let this thing keep going as-is.' I think this is 'change we can believe in.'

As I have family that live/work in the area, I admit to having a vested interest. Nothing is safe in town at this point, even at rush hour. It's absurd, and unacceptable, but that is what happens when Democrats run a city.

This... isn't how statistics work or how this comparison would be done by an intellectually honest administration.

- is it 2024 or 2025
- if this is 2024 data ok
- that means crime is down 30% now
- oh that data is false? then where is this 2024 data from?
- no idea because no sources
- annualized? mid-year? Where did the other data come from?
- won't even get started on comparing 700k pop DC suburb to places like 8.8mil Bogota.. or simply ommited the other cities in the US more 'dangerous' than DC


They've invoked a never before used provision, related to emergencies, and they can't even give us numbers or what the emergency is? No data? Just stand at a podium and tell us the 'truth'.


But hey, maga loves them a good police state.

Late to the thread but this was a great response.

It's also hilarious that Trump pardoned 600+ violent offenders who participated in the Jan 6 riots. Like, how is DC safer with people who assaulted cops back on the streets?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

It's also hilarious that Trump pardoned 600+ violent offenders who participated in the Jan 6 riots. Like, how is DC safer with people who assaulted cops back on the streets?

I'm sure you can provide a follow up as to how many violent crimes those 600+ offenders who were not in any way political prisoners have committed in DC since being released from the gulag?

How many of them assaulted law enforcement officers? How many confidential human sources and agents of federal agencies were among the crowd that day? Why did Nancy Pelosi stop the deployment of the National Guard?

Make DC safe again is a simply rallying cry that in truth everyone in town wants to see happen, but for a few miscreants.
TXAG 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hullabaloonatic said:

ETFan said:

nortex97 said:

blacksox said:

I am interested to see to crime statistics that would warrant a sudden federal takeover. I have a strong feeling they do not exist as violent crime rates have been dropping for decades now in big cities. I suspect this is just more buttering up the public to Trump's abuses of federal power,

What crime statistics would be of interest?

I am interested in what crime data would be supportive of 'let's just let this thing keep going as-is.' I think this is 'change we can believe in.'

As I have family that live/work in the area, I admit to having a vested interest. Nothing is safe in town at this point, even at rush hour. It's absurd, and unacceptable, but that is what happens when Democrats run a city.

This... isn't how statistics work or how this comparison would be done by an intellectually honest administration.

- is it 2024 or 2025
- if this is 2024 data ok
- that means crime is down 30% now
- oh that data is false? then where is this 2024 data from?
- no idea because no sources
- annualized? mid-year? Where did the other data come from?
- won't even get started on comparing 700k pop DC suburb to places like 8.8mil Bogota.. or simply ommited the other cities in the US more 'dangerous' than DC


They've invoked a never before used provision, related to emergencies, and they can't even give us numbers or what the emergency is? No data? Just stand at a podium and tell us the 'truth'.


But hey, maga loves them a good police state.

Late to the thread but this was a great response.

It's also hilarious that Trump pardoned 600+ violent offenders who participated in the Jan 6 riots. Like, how is DC safer with people who assaulted cops back on the streets?

Bless your heart
A Net Full of Jello
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hullabaloonatic said:

ETFan said:

nortex97 said:

blacksox said:

I am interested to see to crime statistics that would warrant a sudden federal takeover. I have a strong feeling they do not exist as violent crime rates have been dropping for decades now in big cities. I suspect this is just more buttering up the public to Trump's abuses of federal power,

What crime statistics would be of interest?

I am interested in what crime data would be supportive of 'let's just let this thing keep going as-is.' I think this is 'change we can believe in.'

As I have family that live/work in the area, I admit to having a vested interest. Nothing is safe in town at this point, even at rush hour. It's absurd, and unacceptable, but that is what happens when Democrats run a city.

This... isn't how statistics work or how this comparison would be done by an intellectually honest administration.

- is it 2024 or 2025
- if this is 2024 data ok
- that means crime is down 30% now
- oh that data is false? then where is this 2024 data from?
- no idea because no sources
- annualized? mid-year? Where did the other data come from?
- won't even get started on comparing 700k pop DC suburb to places like 8.8mil Bogota.. or simply ommited the other cities in the US more 'dangerous' than DC


They've invoked a never before used provision, related to emergencies, and they can't even give us numbers or what the emergency is? No data? Just stand at a podium and tell us the 'truth'.


But hey, maga loves them a good police state.

Late to the thread but this was a great response.

It's also hilarious that Trump pardoned 600+ violent offenders who participated in the Jan 6 riots. Like, how is DC safer with people who assaulted cops back on the streets?

Username checks out.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, but that was after the riots in '68 over MLK's assassination of course, right around where there had been a massive increase vs. the previous year. DC's relative safety today/recently (past 4 years) has been horrendous, and not far from the 'murder capital' reputation it earned under the lovely Marion Barry whose statue still stands in town.

DC had actually become, for those in the 'non-hazardous' quadrants comparatively safe since the late 90's until team Biden ascended to the WH. The rebuilt Union Station was even a nice place to visit, up until around 10 or so years ago.
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Quote:

It's also hilarious that Trump pardoned 600+ violent offenders who participated in the Jan 6 riots. Like, how is DC safer with people who assaulted cops back on the streets?

I'm sure you can provide a follow up as to how many violent crimes those 600+ offenders who were not in any way political prisoners have committed in DC since being released from the gulag?

Would you be asking the same question for literally any other violent offender if they weren't wearing a 'MAGA' hat? I think not. Your interest isn't about crime; it's about which political affiliation the criminal 'belongs' to.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And most of the criminals are your party chief.
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

And most of the criminals are your party chief.

Donald Trump is literally a convicted felon lmao
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.