.@brhodes I am devoting my anger to helping assure you eat this tweet every day for the next 3.5 years.

I just showed your tweet my oldest daughter, who was a teenager when you intentionally nuked our family.

She had a thought for you: 🖕 pic.twitter.com/fNST2Q56p3

— Michael R. Caputo (@MichaelRCaputo) July 19, 2025

Nothing will happen. The swamp protects itself. Already being memory holed.

It's sad. There's no deterrence.

Maybe bankrupting them with legal fees might be enough? Like they did to anyone working for Trump in 2017 and on?

Naw. Reason being these people have banked tens of millions for years and years. They have tens and hundreds of millions before they have a twitch of financial pain.

Think about people such as Jamie Gorelick and Franklin Raines who both banked almost 40 million a piece at Fannie Mae.

Thank you for mentioning Gorekick & Raines!

Had almost forgotten about those cretins!

I’m hearing a very senior former USG official is quite the chatter box …

Can you saying unmasking?@BarackObama @JohnBrennan @Comey @HillaryClinton @JoeBiden you wouldn’t remember anything so it’s not you. @TulsiGabbard @DNIGabbard @realDonaldTrump @AGPamBondi… pic.twitter.com/UQlUKyT3go

— General Mike Flynn (@GenFlynn) July 20, 2025

Hasty legal actions often fail. It takes time to build a case that can't be slithered out of.

@JoeBiden you wouldn't remember anything so it's not you

Pumpkinhead said:

---

This feels like an attempt by Trump admin to try to steer things away from the Epstein conspiracy stuff. Hey, let's pull a Dem hoax/conspiracy thing out of the drawer to distract MAGA with….hmmm…oh here is an old Obama era one…let's do that one! And then also let's keep pumping out activity on the Biden health cover ups.

And at the end of the day probably nothing of significance will happen but will be a lot of 'news' on the topic!

---

They've already stated the letter is bull**** which it is. Trump isn't worried because he knows it's bull**** and they're going to sue about it. Why would they be trying to deflect?

Good grief.

Does this list replace the Epstien client list or how does this work?

ETFan said:

---

Does this list replace the Epstien client list or how does this work?

---

At this point we have more clear evidence of crimes with Russiagate than we do with Epstein. We've seen an FBI attorney be disbarred for falsifying evidence and we've seen the Clinton campaign pay a six figure fine. While we all think we know who's guilty in the Epstein story there's scant little tangible evidence linking back to anyone. That's not true with the Trump-Russia hoax. We know laws were broken.

Do I think anything is going to happen? No. Have I seen proof that the Obama Admin broke the law pushing the Russia hoax? Yes. We all have.

We haven't but you've spoke it so it's true. Facts be damned.

Anyway, op, the simple answer whether you like it or not , is the more important story is getting more coverage.

I desperately want to see this abject moron indicted.

Oh Ben. Ben Ben Ben Ben Ben.
⏰
Tick tock Lil Ben. Your poor family.

Honestly, I feel badly for them because you’ve gotten them into this with your treachery against so many families - so many children - and you cannot get them out because you committed actual crimes.

Heads… https://t.co/ZUv794Y6Z0

— Michael R. Caputo (@MichaelRCaputo) July 19, 2025

His most famous pathetic fail was crying on camera the night GCF lost.

This video of a shell-shocked Ben Rhodes after Hillary's election loss taken from a new HBO documentary is incredible. pic.twitter.com/EnJllQ5rBX

— Noam Blum (@neontaster) May 30, 2018

Still just an oxygen thief of a traitor.

That's a very strong handicapping. Thats not a number rust entices me, so how sbout 6:1?

ETFan said:

---

We haven't but you've spoke it so it's true. Facts be damned.

Anyway, op, the simple answer whether you like it or not , is the more important story is getting more coverage.

---

I think that was to me. What do you mean we haven't?

Why was the FBI attorney disciplined (I said disbarred, that was false)? Why was the DNC and Clinton campaign fined? Why did the FISA court issue a public rebuke of the FBI?

The answer to all of the above is that the Clinton campaign and DNC followed by the FBI lied to everyone including the FISA court which is a crime. The lawyer's license was suspended literally because he pled guilty to falsifying evidence. The FBI secured three FISA warrants under false pretenses. We know that.

We know beyond any doubt crimes were committed so if you don't know that it's on you.

Sorry folks, but this is just another chatterbox idea for Republicans, and other pile of red meat for MAGA to devour. Republicans will preen for the cameras in televised hearings, Byron Donalds will go on Fox News and Fox Business another 25 bazillion or so times saying essentially nothing of substance, there will be a ton of strongly worded tweets and letters, and then no action. The half of the country that doesn't read conservative websites or watch Fox will never even hear of it. Done.

And even if there are indictments, Obama and crew will use the same "official capacity" excuse that Trump used in his own defense.

I can't write (without a permanent ban) the words to describe what I really think of the people who did this. But the best real course of action is to pass some sort of laws (I don't know what) to ensure that such a thing never happens again.

Sadly no one is accountable except we the people. We the ordinary people.

The System said:

---

Absolutely nothing will happen.

---

This. Too much evidence with every single thing the right uncovers about the left's corruption. We just don't have the balls on our side to do anything about it.
Dems just laugh at us and our ineptness.

Houston Lee said:

---

Tulsi was just on Fox this morning. The evidence is damning. Obama himself and his cronies in the admin helped manufacture fake "intelligence" that was used as the foundation for everything "Russia, Russia, Russia".

Now it's been handed off to the DOJ. This is the best shot I have seen in 8 years that something might actually be done to hold those responsible for treasonous acts accountable.

We shall see…

---

We'll see nothing. Have we ever seen anything done? Nope. What's that thing about the definition of insanity...

Capt. Augustus McCrae said:

---

Pam Bondi has all the indictments sitting on her desk as we speak.

---

Bondi is beginning to look like a bad pick. Wish we could've gotten Gaetz.

ts5641 said:

---

Capt. Augustus McCrae said:

---

Pam Bondi has all the indictments sitting on her desk as we speak.

---

Bondi is beginning to look like a bad pick. Wish we could've gotten Gaetz.

---

What would he have done differently?

He'd have done even more TV interviews.

No. The deep state is gonna deep state

MouthBQ98 said:

---

It isn't treason. It is sedition. Very distinct legal issue. Lower penalty but also not an exceptional legal threshold to meet. Other charges could be applied as well.

They will all claim they believed the intelligence was serious enough to justify actions.

---

They can't claim that anymore given the new documents discovered. They falsified the intel

TexAgs91 said:

---

In that X post Rassmussen completely ignores the fact that a president committed sedition against the next president. I would think that's also unacceptable right? Right???

---

Obama is the only POTUS to do that

ETFan said:

---

We haven't but you've spoke it so it's true. Facts be damned.

Anyway, op, the simple answer whether you like it or not , is the more important story is getting more coverage.

---

Clown post

What if it's true …

And what if they know no one will be indicted

And what if this is just a way to spin up and anger middle America and the independents.

Run this for a year - mid terms.

IMO, that's what this is about.

Politics.

If that's their plan, it's not a very well thought out one.

This will be long forgotten by midterms in terms of how it affects voters.

BMX Bandit said:

---

If that's their plan, it's not a very well thought out one.

This will be long forgotten by midterms in terms of how it affects voters.

---

Fair.

What do you think their plan is? Comey nor Brennan are going to jail. So then what?

I actually don't know understand the strategy here.

I don't know if they have a plan. The timing was to get attention off Epstein.

They may have been saving it for later. Who knows?

For now, they will probably push for congressional hearings

Tulsi was on Fox News again this Sunday morning. They have fully recommended criminal referrals to the DOJ. She is releasing more damning evidence in the next week or two. It all points back to Obama and his admin. She wants them all held accountable. Tulsi said it is now in the hands of Bondi and Patel. So, again, I point out, it's not the "Republicans" that are in charge of this. It's the AG, who reports to Trump, in charge of this.

Wabs said:

---

Matt Walsh and I are on the same page with this crap. It's getting old....

Unpopular opinion but I don’t care about this unless they actually arrest and prosecute the culprits, including Obama. You cannot allege a “treasonous conspiracy” and then do nothing about it. The typical pattern by Republicans since forever is to make these kinds of claims… https://t.co/YwcrTB6VQy

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) July 19, 2025

---

Is lying about a stolen election considered a treasonous conspiracy? Hypothetical of course.

NormanEH said:

---

Wabs said:

---

Matt Walsh and I are on the same page with this crap. It's getting old....

Unpopular opinion but I don’t care about this unless they actually arrest and prosecute the culprits, including Obama. You cannot allege a “treasonous conspiracy” and then do nothing about it. The typical pattern by Republicans since forever is to make these kinds of claims… https://t.co/YwcrTB6VQy

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) July 19, 2025

---

Is lying about a stolen election considered a treasonous conspiracy? Hypothetical of course.

---

must not be...Stacy Abrams and Gramma Cabage Farts are still spreading election falsehoods and walking free among us.

BMX Bandit said:

---

That's a very strong handicapping. Thats not a number rust entices me, so how sbout 6:1?

---

Ok, if its 6/1 either Comey or Brennan get sentenced to jail before next POTUS is sworn in, and actually serve time in jail, you got a deal.

You pay me $600 if that outcome. I pay you $100 if both serve no jail time, which basically everyone here thinks is a certain outcome.

Not sure. Ask Joe Biden.