August 10, 2019 Epstein offs himself

Joe Biden President from January 2021 - January 2025

Marjorie Traitor Greene and Tom Massie hold weekly rallies bashing President Trump beginning in the summer of 2025.

what were Marjorie Traitor Greene and Tom Massie doing for Epstein's victims from January 2021 - January 2025?

Wabs said:

---

Seems to be alot of "outrage" from Dems debating this bill because "Trump can release the files today!!!".

Where was this rage during the Biden administration?

---

Nobody expects the Dems to do the right thing. We expect the Republicans to do the right thing. Hope this helps.

PaulsBunions said:

---

Wabs said:

---

Seems to be alot of "outrage" from Dems debating this bill because "Trump can release the files today!!!".

Where was this rage during the Biden administration?

---

Nobody expects the Dems to do the right thing. We expect the Republicans to do the right thing. Hope this helps.

---

so then, why were MTG and Randy Jr not clamoring for this? Were they under the spell of "dear leader"?

Why didn't Massie and Khanna drive for the same answers? Why not the press? Why not you?

Seems to me a whole bunch of people don't seem to care unless there is a birthday card or recycled email.

BREAKING - A newly revealed email shows Democrat-funding group Dynamic SRG contacting Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 to promote then freshman Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, calling him “Brooklyn’s Barack,” while urging Epstein to support a major Democratic fundraising push. pic.twitter.com/LhSBjOI4yb

— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) November 16, 2025

Wait?!

This is Governor Pritzker’s cousin Tom Pritzker?

Poor Virginia Giuffre testified she was with him once.

Another major Democrat implicated.

This might explain JB Pritzker’s unhinged hate for President Trump.

This will not work out the way the Dems and media thought… pic.twitter.com/FwYrkL4dpb

— C3 (@C_3C_3) November 17, 2025

captkirk said:

---

BREAKING - A newly revealed email shows Democrat-funding group Dynamic SRG contacting Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 to promote then freshman Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, calling him “Brooklyn’s Barack,” while urging Epstein to support a major Democratic fundraising push. pic.twitter.com/LhSBjOI4yb

— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) November 16, 2025

Wait?!

This is Governor Pritzker’s cousin Tom Pritzker?

Poor Virginia Giuffre testified she was with him once.

Another major Democrat implicated.

This might explain JB Pritzker’s unhinged hate for President Trump.

This will not work out the way the Dems and media thought… pic.twitter.com/FwYrkL4dpb

— C3 (@C_3C_3) November 17, 2025

---

Yet another why everyone on the right should have been consistent with wanting the files released this entire time.

Imagine what's left to be found.

flown-the-coop said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

Wabs said:

---

Seems to be alot of "outrage" from Dems debating this bill because "Trump can release the files today!!!".

Where was this rage during the Biden administration?

---

Nobody expects the Dems to do the right thing. We expect the Republicans to do the right thing. Hope this helps.

---

so then, why were MTG and Randy Jr not clamoring for this? Were they under the spell of "dear leader"?

Why didn't Massie and Khanna drive for the same answers? Why not the press? Why not you?

Seems to me a whole bunch of people don't seem to care unless there is a birthday card or recycled email.

---

Great questions. But my comment was specifically about how Dems were clamoring today, saying "Trump has the power to release them today. What is he hiding!".

Where were they when Biden had power to do the same?

Yes, please keep posting whichever side you want to expose and let's all celebrate as this comes out bit by bit and burns the deep state and economy to the ground under Trump's leadership.

We're going to run them all off, eventually.

For any goofball who keeps asking, "WHY DIDN'T THE DIMSSSSS RELASEEEEEE THEMMMMMM?!"

You're about to find out.

PaulsBunions said:

---

Wabs said:

---

Seems to be alot of "outrage" from Dems debating this bill because "Trump can release the files today!!!".

Where was this rage during the Biden administration?

---

Nobody expects the Dems to do the right thing. We expect the Republicans to do the right thing. Hope this helps.

---

releasing the identities of hundreds of victims without their permission is "doing the right thing"?!

says who?

Not sure why people are discussing parties concerning this.


Anyhow, they're voting now, unanimously yes so far.

LMCane said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

Wabs said:

---

Seems to be alot of "outrage" from Dems debating this bill because "Trump can release the files today!!!".

Where was this rage during the Biden administration?

---

Nobody expects the Dems to do the right thing. We expect the Republicans to do the right thing. Hope this helps.

---

releasing the identities of hundreds of victims without their permission is "doing the right thing"?!

says who?

---

Where has anyone called for releasing the names of victims?

LMCane said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

Wabs said:

---

Seems to be alot of "outrage" from Dems debating this bill because "Trump can release the files today!!!".

Where was this rage during the Biden administration?

---

Nobody expects the Dems to do the right thing. We expect the Republicans to do the right thing. Hope this helps.

---

releasing the identities of hundreds of victims without their permission is "doing the right thing"?!

says who?

---

Have you even read the bill?

"Raju asked Massie what it means if the Senate changes the Epstein bill.

Massie:

"Then they're part of the cover-up. Johnson's press conference shows he's unrepentant. They have a backup plan, and it's going to blow up on them."

"He's trying to say the rich, powerful men who flew to Epstein Island are the victims now. The only way a 'Christian man' can stand up there and sell a lie like that is if he's already decided in his head that protecting them is somehow okay."

ETFan said:

---

"Raju asked Massie what it means if the Senate changes the Epstein bill.

Massie:

"Then they're part of the cover-up. Johnson's press conference shows he's unrepentant. They have a backup plan, and it's going to blow up on them."

---

LET'S GO!!

EDIT: I'll add to other post.

ETFan said:

---

"Raju asked Massie what it means if the Senate changes the Epstein bill.

Massie:

"Then they're part of the cover-up. Johnson's press conference shows he's unrepentant. They have a backup plan, and it's going to blow up on them."

---

God, Massie may have lost moree of his marbles than MTG.

What the hell is he trying to say here?

Compare his rhetoric to that of Swalwell. Bipartisan unhingedness.

And MTG said she would use the protection of the Speech & Debate clause to start naming names, but still silence on her part.

Massie is working political relevancy angles, just like MTG.

They have ZERO regard for the victims. Just last gasping acts of theater for two people who got over their skis thinking they were important.

I expect the bill to pass the senate 99 - 1 (Fetterman)

My legislation with @RepRoKhanna to release the Epstein files just passed 427 to 1 ! pic.twitter.com/iI9VZ6WFLe

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) November 18, 2025

Clay Higgins the only Nay

I have been a principled “NO” on this bill from the beginning. What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses,…

— Rep. Clay Higgins (@RepClayHiggins) November 18, 2025

PaulsBunions said:

---

Clay Higgins the only Nay

I have been a principled “NO” on this bill from the beginning. What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses,…

— Rep. Clay Higgins (@RepClayHiggins) November 18, 2025

---

He's not wrong. Anyone who ever visited the island is gonna get skewered by the media and public. Oh well. Still, release the files.

GeorgiAg said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

Clay Higgins the only Nay

I have been a principled “NO” on this bill from the beginning. What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses,…

— Rep. Clay Higgins (@RepClayHiggins) November 18, 2025

---

He's not wrong. Anyone who ever visited the island is gonna get skewered by the media and public. Oh well. Still, release the files.

---

Agreed, anyone who was at that level of power knew exactly what Epstein was doing (including Trump), so I don't have a lot of sympathy for the "innocents" who apparently decided to ignore it for a fun vacation.

DarkBrandon01 said:

---

I expect the bill to pass the senate 99 - 1 (Fetterman)

---

Do not count on it.

Trump/Johnson would not have made this last ditch push to tell them to vote for it if they did not have a solid as rock backup plan. Either the Senate amends this or fails it, or Trump says "We can't release this because there is an ongoing investigation that I just ordered via Twitter." I hope Massie and MTG have something up their sleeve to keep taking it to them.

NEW: Minority Leader Jeffries solicited campaign donations from Jeffrey Epstein in 2013, years after his convictions, according to emails released from Epstein’s estate. pic.twitter.com/kWipvrwVrv

— E X X ➠A L E R T S (@ExxAlerts) November 18, 2025

No Spin Ag said:

---

captkirk said:

---

BREAKING - A newly revealed email shows Democrat-funding group Dynamic SRG contacting Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 to promote then freshman Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, calling him “Brooklyn’s Barack,” while urging Epstein to support a major Democratic fundraising push. pic.twitter.com/LhSBjOI4yb

— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) November 16, 2025

Wait?!

This is Governor Pritzker’s cousin Tom Pritzker?

Poor Virginia Giuffre testified she was with him once.

Another major Democrat implicated.

This might explain JB Pritzker’s unhinged hate for President Trump.

This will not work out the way the Dems and media thought… pic.twitter.com/FwYrkL4dpb

— C3 (@C_3C_3) November 17, 2025

---

Yet another why everyone on the right should have been consistent with wanting the files released this entire time.

Imagine what's left to be found.

---

I think the vast majority of us were. Not sure what people want from us...another Jan 6 type gathering? Vast majority of us have been consistent, and frustrated. At some point though, have to realize it is completely out of our control and we can hope in one hand and sh** in the other.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Agreed, anyone who was at that level of power knew exactly what Epstein was doing (including Trump), so I don't have a lot of sympathy for the "innocents" who apparently decided to ignore it for a fun vacation.

---

won't someone think of the poor billionaires and politicians who visited epstein island for the scenery and politely declined the child prostitutes?

some of them may have even told him to cut it out and we shouldn't penalize them for their bravery

GeorgiAg said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

Clay Higgins the only Nay

I have been a principled “NO” on this bill from the beginning. What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses,…

— Rep. Clay Higgins (@RepClayHiggins) November 18, 2025

---

He's not wrong. Anyone who ever visited the island is gonna get skewered by the media and public. Oh well. Still, release the files.

---

My guess is anyone that visited the island, even if they didn't know when they got there, probably knew when they left and kept quiet.


**** em.

Quote:

---

Anyone who ever visited the island is gonna get skewered by the media and public

---

The Flight Logs were released long ago

Gonna almost be funny when there is very little in there to show one way or the other if anything bad happened.

I feel like people are expecting the following:

- Bill Clinton porked a minor on January x, xxxx. Her name was x.
- Donald Trump never porked anyone.
- Larry Summers tried to pork a woman on March x, xxxx but his game was no good.

Dems have a bit of an inconsistent message on this. Swalwell out saying Trump has power to release everything. Another House Dem saying that the resolution was needed to compel the courts to release some information saying that the executive cannot force the judiciary to release (but evidently Congress can)?

Trumps had about enough of this. I imagine there will be a call to King Chuck, BiBi and to his alphabet leaders to say **** your privacy, sources, methods and classification, it's all going on front street.

To his rich friends, well, I don't think Trump has a lot of sympathy for them now having to pony up to defend their association with Epstein, no matter how credible, incredibly and incredible the information may be.

YouBet said:

---

Gonna almost be funny when there is very little in there to show one way or the other if anything bad happened.

I feel like people are expecting the following:

- Bill Clinton porked a minor on January x, xxxx. Her name was x.
- Donald Trump never porked anyone.
- Larry Summers tried to pork a woman on March x, xxxx but his game was no good.

---

No sir most anyone with two brain cells to rub together know that either there was never any evidence of that, or that any evidence has been scrubbed or destroyed the moment it was first collected.

What we're expecting are his intelligence ties, who helped him make his connections, and who covered for him after he was convicted of sex trafficing, which is why the latest loophole from Mike Johnson about protecting "means and methods" is so important. But that's okay, the American people will just keep leaning on them until they all break, party politics, "national security", and the economy be damned.

Frequent guest and cohost Andy Mountwindsorbatten banged x underage females, 2 underage males, 3 kittens and one goat on video wearing his full dress regalia and invoking his mother's name.

Many of the other alleged perps are old powerful white men with wealth and connections to exile themselves, more than they may have already.

What this will not do is provide any sort of justice for the victims.

flown-the-coop said:

---

Frequent guest and cohost Andy Mountwindsorbatten banged x underage females, 2 underage males, 3 kittens and one goat on video wearing his full dress regalia and invoking his mother's name.

Many of the other alleged perps are old powerful white men with wealth and connections to exile themselves, more than they may have already.

What this will not do is provide any sort of justice for the victims.

---

Correct, which is why we're going after the entire system of shadow governance.

Who is? Khanna and Massie? If they sucked each others brains they would still not manage to rub two brain cells together.

Zero evidence Epstein was at the center of some global intelligence network.

Those usually do not center on a socially odd dude with con man esque way of weaving himself into social networks he had no business being in, who was typically shun when his game was exposed.

Ghislaine may have been more connected but other than being a useful informant i think it stops there.

But it's entertaining to see others imagination at work.

News: Thune says President Trump sounds ready to sign the Epstein resolution after it passed the House so Senate will likely take it up “fairly quickly.” Says Speaker Johnson wants changes but after a 427-1 House vote those changes might not happen

— Burgess Everett (@burgessev) November 18, 2025

flown-the-coop said:

---

Who is? Khanna and Massie? If they sucked each others brains they would still not manage to rub two brain cells together.

Zero evidence Epstein was at the center of some global intelligence network.

Those usually do not center on a socially odd dude with con man esque way of weaving himself into social networks he had no business being in, who was typically shun when his game was exposed.

Ghislaine may have been more connected but other than being a useful informant i think it stops there.

But it's entertaining to see others imagination at work.

---

Apparently they're smart enough to get 427 house reps to agree.

Quote:

---

Khanna and Massie? If they sucked each others brains they would still not manage to rub two brain cells together.

---

This is pretty hilarious considering Massie is an engineer and his home runs on an electrical system he built that is off-grid.