DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

757,285 Views | 7806 Replies | Last: 15 hrs ago by Dorm 15
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:

A true conservative patriot like Lindsey Graham would never involve himself with such nonsense!


No Lindsey is too busy going to Disney celebrating the war he helped start.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGHouston11 said:

Zachary Klement said:

A true conservative patriot like Lindsey Graham would never involve himself with such nonsense!


No Lindsey is too busy going to Disney celebrating the war he helped start.

As he should be! Great work! A grown man going to Disneyworld alone is perfectly normal and not weird. Someone should tell Thomas Massie to give it a try.
Rocky Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dorm 15 said:

I only became deeply interested in the Epstein case because of the New Mexico connection. From reading the posts on this thread it appears that the individuals who down play the significance of failure to reveal all the files are those that are President Trump's strongest supporters. For the record, I do not believe there is any evidence that would incriminate President Trump. My reading of this topic,I cannot recall anyone who has suggested such. The Nassar, Swalwell, and Sandusky disgusting episodes have nothing to do with releasing the Epstein Files. I am just amazed that anyone would be OK or trying to justify the files not being released.


There's clearly a motive for slow rolling files release. I believe Trump isn't protecting himself, he's protecting friends and friends of friends. He made strongly worded comments regarding releasing the files such as ""Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!"."

Earlier he explained his hesitancy to release documents as concern that good people could be hurt by phony information.

Trump couldn't care less about people getting hurt, UNLESS, it results in the loss of big donations for the ballroom or his library.

The majority of the billionaire class takes care of each other. They are neither liberal nor conservative. They are only interested in their personal financial interests.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGHouston11 said:

flown-the-coop said:

Why is the Democrats legislature using funds setup for victims of esptein to create this "Truth Commission"?

That doesn't feel like justice for the victims. Feels like a bad use of funds for libs in New Mexico to grandstand on Epstein a few months before the midterms.

Prediction, July 31st "report" will be rehashed innuendo for political purposes.


Well after the midterms when the leftists take control back if you don't like this you are definitely not going to like what's coming next. Trump and the DOJ had complete control over this from the first day of the second term. They could have been the lead on this in a good way. Instead the complete opposite.

The incoming circus that is coming is sadly well deserved.
It's too bad though for those that expected better.

Unless they get a majority in the senate and end the filibuster then no worries at all. Even then it takes 67 to remove POTUS.

If libs want to start the national divorce in November, let's get it started. But Trump and those who love America should not be threatened by the POTENTIAL for libs to gain a majority in Nov and capitulate to them before elections. Thats the way flaccid Rs have acted. No more.

Just because the Dems stage a circus does not mean people have to show up for it.
Dorm 15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocky Rider said:

Dorm 15 said:

I only became deeply interested in the Epstein case because of the New Mexico connection. From reading the posts on this thread it appears that the individuals who down play the significance of failure to reveal all the files are those that are President Trump's strongest supporters. For the record, I do not believe there is any evidence that would incriminate President Trump. My reading of this topic,I cannot recall anyone who has suggested such. The Nassar, Swalwell, and Sandusky disgusting episodes have nothing to do with releasing the Epstein Files. I am just amazed that anyone would be OK or trying to justify the files not being released.


There's clearly a motive for slow rolling files release. I believe Trump isn't protecting himself, he's protecting friends and friends of friends. He made strongly worded comments regarding releasing the files such as ""Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!"."

Earlier he explained his hesitancy to release documents as concern that good people could be hurt by phony information.

Trump couldn't care less about people getting hurt, UNLESS, it results in the loss of big donations for the ballroom or his library.

The majority of the billionaire class takes care of each other. They are neither liberal nor conservative. They are only interested in their personal financial interests.

While I certainly do not know if this is the case that has been my suspicion. That is why I find it strange that so many seem to fear President Trump being implicated. I do know that one of the purposes of the New Mexico investigation is trying to discover who knew what locally.
First Page Refresh
Page 224 of 224
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.