DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

953,918 Views | 8308 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Queso1
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


https://cbs12.com/news/local/desantis-slams-palm-beach-gop-endorsement-of-suspended-clerk-mike-caruso-florida-news-local-news-florida-politics-local-politics

There must be something in the water in Palm Beach, why do all the perverts flock there
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good, release every name.

"Democrats have begun naming associates of Jeffrey Epstein whose identities were redacted in official files.

Leon Botstein a former president of Bard College in New York, resigned from his remaining academic posts on Wednesday after Jamie Raskin, a Democrat and senior member of the House judiciary committee, wrote a letter to the university linking him to several emails in the tranche of documents relating to the Epstein investigation.

It included an email from May 2014 that was attributed to Mr. Botstein, in which the author asked Epstein whether a young woman was "for me, or are you keeping her for yourself"."

Telegraph: NAMES
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

Good, release every name.

"Democrats have begun naming associates of Jeffrey Epstein whose identities were redacted in official files.

Leon Botstein a former president of Bard College in New York, resigned from his remaining academic posts on Wednesday after Jamie Raskin, a Democrat and senior member of the House judiciary committee, wrote a letter to the university linking him to several emails in the tranche of documents relating to the Epstein investigation.

It included an email from May 2014 that was attributed to Mr. Botstein, in which the author asked Epstein whether a young woman was "for me, or are you keeping her for yourself"."

Telegraph: NAMES


Bongino and Patel have both said there was no one else besides JE involved. They have seen everything and if there was they would have definitely done something.

And Patel is who we are trusting to lead the FBI now. It's just a new swamp.
Billys Cesspool Enjoyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, but this swamp is loyal to Dear Leader, so they can be trusted.
โ€œโ€ฆWhat?โ€

- Joe Biden
GMaster0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dimond1968 said:

Likely why Trump flipped. Seems that was the start right there.


Also Trump is mentioned more in the Epstein files than Jesus is in the Bible. So there's that too.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GMaster0 said:

Dimond1968 said:

Likely why Trump flipped. Seems that was the start right there.


Also Trump is mentioned more in the Epstein files than Jesus is in the Bible. So there's that too.

Well, Trump has publicly portrayed himself as Jesus-esque, so no surprise there.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sooooo anyone mind giving a sentence or two synopsis of this thread if they have been here since the beginning? Just opened it for the first time myself.

TIA
Ducks4brkfast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus said:

Sooooo anyone mind giving a sentence or two synopsis of this thread if they have been here since the beginning? Just opened it for the first time myself.

TIA

Thread begins with the Trump administration's July 2025 conclusion that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide and that investigators found no incriminating client list warranting further prosecutions.

The thread quickly became a highly polarized political argument over whether the government was being transparent or covering up information about Epstein's powerful associates, with participants debating the credibility of the DOJ, the handling of evidence, and whether both Republican and Democratic administrations had failed to deliver accountability.

As the discussion grew, the central issue shifted from Epstein's death to the Trump administration's changing statements about the files, the extent of redactions and withheld records, and whether the public would ever see a full accounting. There is no consensus or definitive resolution in the threadjust an increasingly acrimonious debate over transparency, political hypocrisy, and accountability for potentially implicated people across both parties.




Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ah. That is pretty much exactly what I was thinking it would be. Thanks for that.
Ducks4brkfast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Welcome. Sorry it took me so long to type up.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus said:

Sooooo anyone mind giving a sentence or two synopsis of this thread if they have been here since the beginning? Just opened it for the first time myself.

TIA

assorted facts and innuendo around what was essentially a Mossad honeypot operation.
revvie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:



https://cbs12.com/news/local/desantis-slams-palm-beach-gop-endorsement-of-suspended-clerk-mike-caruso-florida-news-local-news-florida-politics-local-politics

There must be something in the water in Palm Beach, why do all the perverts flock there

Mar a Lago
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ducks4brkfast said:

Eliminatus said:

Sooooo anyone mind giving a sentence or two synopsis of this thread if they have been here since the beginning? Just opened it for the first time myself.

TIA

Thread begins with the Trump administration's July 2025 conclusion that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide and that investigators found no incriminating client list warranting further prosecutions.

The thread quickly became a highly polarized political argument over whether the government was being transparent or covering up information about Epstein's powerful associates, with participants debating the credibility of the DOJ, the handling of evidence, and whether both Republican and Democratic administrations had failed to deliver accountability.

As the discussion grew, the central issue shifted from Epstein's death to the Trump administration's changing statements about the files, the extent of redactions and withheld records, and whether the public would ever see a full accounting. There is no consensus or definitive resolution in the threadjust an increasingly acrimonious debate over transparency, political hypocrisy, and accountability for potentially implicated people across both parties.




Just left out the most important part. If you still want to talk about some old dead guy JE you are a moron according to Trump and he doesn't want your support. Then the faithful are supposed to attack those who disagree.
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biggest cover up since the Montreal Screwjob!

I just wanted to say that. But yes, it's a perversion of justice against the American people. We are used to it. What hurt the most is the guy I elected to address the issue is the coverup artist.
First Page Refresh
Page 238 of 238 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.