techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

Doubt we'll get much more, Bondi does not care about following the law Trump signed a couple months ago.

PaulsBunions said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

Doubt we'll get much more, Bondi does not care about following the law Trump signed a couple months ago.

---

It makes one wonder why. It also makes one wonder why Trump isn't demanding in public or his social media for her to move faster or explain why.

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

I'm sure all maga who were calling for the release would love for everything in the files to be released by now. I mean, with everything released they'll finally "we got him!" of Bill. Granted, the left hopes they'll get their "we got him! of Trump, but I'm sure the people (maga) of law and order have no problem with both Bill and Trump sharing a jail cell if it came to that. Because law and justice and all that they say they're all about.

No Spin Ag said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

I'm sure all maga who were calling for the release would love for everything in the files to be released by now. I mean, with everything released they'll finally "we got him!" of Bill. Granted, the left hopes they'll get their "we got him! of Trump, but I'm sure the people (maga) of law and order have no problem with both Bill and Trump sharing a jail cell if it came to that. Because law and justice and all that they say they're all about.

---

Law & Order? Yes, that would be great. All we have is innuendo & leaks. Still waiting on an actual investigation or even a claim from a victim so, you know, we can have some law and order.

No Spin Ag said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

Doubt we'll get much more, Bondi does not care about following the law Trump signed a couple months ago.

---

It makes one wonder why. It also makes one wonder why Trump isn't demanding in public or his social media for her to move faster or explain why.

---

Probably because of the mass amount of worldly chaos it would cause. One the public sees people like Bill Gates, Obama, and world leaders for other countries in there........sh-t is gonna go down.

93MarineHorn said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

I'm sure all maga who were calling for the release would love for everything in the files to be released by now. I mean, with everything released they'll finally "we got him!" of Bill. Granted, the left hopes they'll get their "we got him! of Trump, but I'm sure the people (maga) of law and order have no problem with both Bill and Trump sharing a jail cell if it came to that. Because law and justice and all that they say they're all about.

---

Law & Order? Yes, that would be great. All we have is innuendo & leaks. Still waiting on an actual investigation or even a claim from a victim so, you know, we can have some law and order.

---

I assume you're talking about investigations/claims from a victim against Trump, because we have about 1.7 million files of investigations about Epstein (according to the DOJ)

David_Puddy said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

Doubt we'll get much more, Bondi does not care about following the law Trump signed a couple months ago.

---

It makes one wonder why. It also makes one wonder why Trump isn't demanding in public or his social media for her to move faster or explain why.

---

Probably because of the mass amount of worldly chaos it would cause. One the public sees people like Bill Gates, Obama, and world leaders for other countries in there........sh-t is gonna go down.

---

You forgot W, Trump, and who knows who else, on both sides.

Me, I'm good with them all going down. For many on the right, they only want things to come out so long as it takes down the other side, yet for some reason don't seem to have the same level of enthusiasm of it takes down one of theirs.

Now exactly fair and balanced, que no.

93MarineHorn said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

I'm sure all maga who were calling for the release would love for everything in the files to be released by now. I mean, with everything released they'll finally "we got him!" of Bill. Granted, the left hopes they'll get their "we got him! of Trump, but I'm sure the people (maga) of law and order have no problem with both Bill and Trump sharing a jail cell if it came to that. Because law and justice and all that they say they're all about.

---

Law & Order? Yes, that would be great. All we have is innuendo & leaks. Still waiting on an actual investigation or even a claim from a victim so, you know, we can have some law and order.

---

If things would move faster we'd get to that point. I'm sure those calling for Bill's scalp because, "see, there's pics of him!" will also be calling for scalps of Trump, seeing as how, "see, there's pics of him!"

No Spin Ag said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

I'm sure all maga who were calling for the release would love for everything in the files to be released by now. I mean, with everything released they'll finally "we got him!" of Bill. Granted, the left hopes they'll get their "we got him! of Trump, but I'm sure the people (maga) of law and order have no problem with both Bill and Trump sharing a jail cell if it came to that. Because law and justice and all that they say they're all about.

---

Law & Order? Yes, that would be great. All we have is innuendo & leaks. Still waiting on an actual investigation or even a claim from a victim so, you know, we can have some law and order.

---

If things would move faster we'd get to that point. I'm sure those calling for Bill's scalp because, "see, there's pics of him!" will also be calling for scalps of Trump, seeing as how, "see, there's pics of him!"

---

Clinton actually flew on the Lolita Express to the private island multiple times. Trump did not.

Epstein had a painting of Clinton in a dress at his house and was apparently very close friends with Clinton. Trump expelled him from Mar a Lago.

Clinton is now violation of the law by snubbing the Congressional subpoena. Not a good look. We need answers. We need to know what he knows and what he did.

The Clinton’s think they’re above the law but they’re not. They must comply with congressional subpoenas and appear before the House of Representatives, or face arrest, conviction, and incarceration. I suspect they’ve observed Bondi’s lack of resolve and have decided to test it.

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 14, 2026

If Bondi can flaunt the law why can't the Clintons

PaulsBunions said:

---

The Clinton’s think they’re above the law but they’re not. They must comply with congressional subpoenas and appear before the House of Representatives, or face arrest, conviction, and incarceration. I suspect they’ve observed Bondi’s lack of resolve and have decided to test it.

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 14, 2026

If Bondi can flaunt the law why can't the Clintons

---

Because it's diffRent?

.@AGPamBondi should be called to testify in the House Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight Committee where she must answer for her failure to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

It’s unusual that she’s never appeared in front of the House Judiciary Committee.

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 14, 2026

techno-ag said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

I'm sure all maga who were calling for the release would love for everything in the files to be released by now. I mean, with everything released they'll finally "we got him!" of Bill. Granted, the left hopes they'll get their "we got him! of Trump, but I'm sure the people (maga) of law and order have no problem with both Bill and Trump sharing a jail cell if it came to that. Because law and justice and all that they say they're all about.

---

Law & Order? Yes, that would be great. All we have is innuendo & leaks. Still waiting on an actual investigation or even a claim from a victim so, you know, we can have some law and order.

---

If things would move faster we'd get to that point. I'm sure those calling for Bill's scalp because, "see, there's pics of him!" will also be calling for scalps of Trump, seeing as how, "see, there's pics of him!"

---

Clinton actually flew on the Lolita Express to the private island multiple times. Trump did not.

Epstein had a painting of Clinton in a dress at his house and was apparently very close friends with Clinton. Trump expelled him from Mar a Lago.

Clinton is now violation of the law by snubbing the Congressional subpoena. Not a good look. We need answers. We need to know what he knows and what he did.

---

Agreed, but we need to know what everyone knows and what they did. Or do you just stop at those you don't like and are okay with those you do possibly getting away with not having the same done to them as the clintons?

No Spin Ag said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

Doubt we'll get much more, Bondi does not care about following the law Trump signed a couple months ago.

---

It makes one wonder why. It also makes one wonder why Trump isn't demanding in public or his social media for her to move faster or explain why.

---

Probably because of the mass amount of worldly chaos it would cause. One the public sees people like Bill Gates, Obama, and world leaders for other countries in there........sh-t is gonna go down.

---

You forgot W, Trump, and who knows who else, on both sides.

Me, I'm good with them all going down. For many on the right, they only want things to come out so long as it takes down the other side, yet for some reason don't seem to have the same level of enthusiasm of it takes down one of theirs.

Now exactly fair and balanced, que no.

---

That is implied. I don't care who is on there and what side of the aisle that they're on, but they need to be arrested if they were on that island. That said, anyone with common sense knows that if Trump were on there in any way that would implicate him other than being at the same events or sharing a plane ride or 2 with Epstein a long time ago, that the files would have been released well in advance of the 2024 election. I mean the left tried to assassinate him twice, can you honestly sit there and type with a straight face, that you feel like he's part of the pedo stuff?

David_Puddy said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

techno-ag said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-clinton-defies-congressional-subpoena-appear-jeffrey-epstein-probe.amp

What's Clinton hiding?

---

We don't know but let hope the DOJ actually release the files so we can find out.

---

Doubt we'll get much more, Bondi does not care about following the law Trump signed a couple months ago.

---

It makes one wonder why. It also makes one wonder why Trump isn't demanding in public or his social media for her to move faster or explain why.

---

Probably because of the mass amount of worldly chaos it would cause. One the public sees people like Bill Gates, Obama, and world leaders for other countries in there........sh-t is gonna go down.

---

You forgot W, Trump, and who knows who else, on both sides.

Me, I'm good with them all going down. For many on the right, they only want things to come out so long as it takes down the other side, yet for some reason don't seem to have the same level of enthusiasm of it takes down one of theirs.

Now exactly fair and balanced, que no.

---

That is implied. I don't care who is on there and what side of the aisle that they're on, but they need to be arrested if they were on that island. That said, anyone with common sense knows that if Trump were on there in any way that would implicate him other than being at the same events or sharing a plane ride or 2 with Epstein a long time ago, that the files would have been released well in advance of the 2024 election. I mean the left tried to assassinate him twice, can you honestly sit there and type with a straight face, that you feel like he's part of the pedo stuff?

---

I can say with a straight face that I, like everyone, has no proof of anything.

I can also say with a straight face that I want all files released so that all necessary legal action can be taken.

I can say with a straight face that I'll feel the same way about anyone who is charged and ends up in prison, regardless of if their name is Clinton or Trump, or anyone.

I think we're all on the same page here. You seem to be insinuating that Trump has full control over the release of the files, which isn't the case. I don't believe that Trump is in those files that would implicate him at all, and you seem to disagree.

David_Puddy said:

---

I think we're all on the same page here. You seem to be insinuating that Trump has full control over the release of the files, which isn't the case. I don't believe that Trump is in those files that would implicate him at all, and you seem to disagree.

---

Trump pitched a fit all last year over the files and threatened anybody pushing for their release, then when the vote was forced his hand picked DOJ head failed to follow the law he signed in November. Either the DOJ head is incompetent or she's following some direction from her boss.

He has said more than once he is fine releasing everything. His DOJ has to do their job at some point in the full scale release and they're not. Did you raise this much of a stink from 2020-2024 on the release as well? I'm guessing that I know the answer

David_Puddy said:

---

He has said more than once he is fine releasing everything. His DOJ has to do their job at some point in the full scale release and they're not. Did you raise this much of a stink from 2020-2024 on the release as well? I'm guessing that I know the answer

---

Trump has flipped a bunch of times on this issue since he became president. I voted for him expecting the transparency we didn't get from the Biden admin. Whether or not I "raised a stink" is irrelevant, this cope of requiring a criticism of the Biden admin before we criticize the Trump admin is silly.

David_Puddy said:

---

I think we're all on the same page here. You seem to be insinuating that Trump has full control over the release of the files, which isn't the case. I don't believe that Trump is in those files that would implicate him at all, and you seem to disagree.

---

No, I've never said there's anything that would implicate Trump. I have no proof and don't take pictures and whatnot as proof.

Right now everyone is innocent until proven guilty. I just react to have all the information released so justice can be served.

I'll sleep fine of Bill gets locked up as I would Trump or whoever. I just want justice. Simple.

ETA: That, yes, we do seem to be on the same page.

PaulsBunions said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

I think we're all on the same page here. You seem to be insinuating that Trump has full control over the release of the files, which isn't the case. I don't believe that Trump is in those files that would implicate him at all, and you seem to disagree.

---

Trump pitched a fit all last year over the files and threatened anybody pushing for their release, then when the vote was forced his hand picked DOJ head failed to follow the law he signed in November. Either the DOJ head is incompetent or she's following some direction from her boss.

---

So who should pick the head of the DOJ? Strange comment.

How is she incompetent? Because Massie let Ro bait him into an impossible scope and timeline?

Massie can issue all the subpoenas he wants, no judge will enforce them against the DOJ who is actively complying with the act, excluding the ******ed unenforceable non-contemplated timeframe.

There must be pressure from world leaders and CEOs who don't want their names out. And celebrities.

flown-the-coop said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

I think we're all on the same page here. You seem to be insinuating that Trump has full control over the release of the files, which isn't the case. I don't believe that Trump is in those files that would implicate him at all, and you seem to disagree.

---

Trump pitched a fit all last year over the files and threatened anybody pushing for their release, then when the vote was forced his hand picked DOJ head failed to follow the law he signed in November. Either the DOJ head is incompetent or she's following some direction from her boss.

---

So who should pick the head of the DOJ? Strange comment.

How is she incompetent? Because Massie let Ro bait him into an impossible scope and timeline?

Massie can issue all the subpoenas he wants, no judge will enforce them against the DOJ who is actively complying with the act, excluding the ******ed unenforceable non-contemplated timeframe.

---

I think the timeline is one of the biggest issues.

If you figure 15 million pages, they were given 30 days to release them. So, that's a legal review of 500K pages per day. If you stuck 1000 lawyers on this that's 500 pages per lawyer per day for review AND analysis as to what can or should be redacted.

I don't think that kind of expectation is feasible.

Ag with kids said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

I think we're all on the same page here. You seem to be insinuating that Trump has full control over the release of the files, which isn't the case. I don't believe that Trump is in those files that would implicate him at all, and you seem to disagree.

---

Trump pitched a fit all last year over the files and threatened anybody pushing for their release, then when the vote was forced his hand picked DOJ head failed to follow the law he signed in November. Either the DOJ head is incompetent or she's following some direction from her boss.

---

So who should pick the head of the DOJ? Strange comment.

How is she incompetent? Because Massie let Ro bait him into an impossible scope and timeline?

Massie can issue all the subpoenas he wants, no judge will enforce them against the DOJ who is actively complying with the act, excluding the ******ed unenforceable non-contemplated timeframe.

---

I think the timeline is one of the biggest issues.

If you figure 15 million pages, they were given 30 days to release them. So, that's a legal review of 500K pages per day. If you stuck 1000 lawyers on this that's 500 pages per lawyer per day for review AND analysis as to what can or should be redacted.

I don't think that kind of expectation is feasible.

---

I have little sympathy for the DC bureaucrats who delayed this as much as possible before the vote forced them to comply with the will of the American people.

Ag with kids said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

I think we're all on the same page here. You seem to be insinuating that Trump has full control over the release of the files, which isn't the case. I don't believe that Trump is in those files that would implicate him at all, and you seem to disagree.

---

Trump pitched a fit all last year over the files and threatened anybody pushing for their release, then when the vote was forced his hand picked DOJ head failed to follow the law he signed in November. Either the DOJ head is incompetent or she's following some direction from her boss.

---

So who should pick the head of the DOJ? Strange comment.

How is she incompetent? Because Massie let Ro bait him into an impossible scope and timeline?

Massie can issue all the subpoenas he wants, no judge will enforce them against the DOJ who is actively complying with the act, excluding the ******ed unenforceable non-contemplated timeframe.

---

I think the timeline is one of the biggest issues.

If you figure 15 million pages, they were given 30 days to release them. So, that's a legal review of 500K pages per day. If you stuck 1000 lawyers on this that's 500 pages per lawyer per day for review AND analysis as to what can or should be redacted.

I don't think that kind of expectation is feasible.

---

We've gone from "release all the files!" to "the files don't exist!" to "there's 15 million of them, so many that we're drowning in them."

PaulsBunions said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

I think we're all on the same page here. You seem to be insinuating that Trump has full control over the release of the files, which isn't the case. I don't believe that Trump is in those files that would implicate him at all, and you seem to disagree.

---

Trump pitched a fit all last year over the files and threatened anybody pushing for their release, then when the vote was forced his hand picked DOJ head failed to follow the law he signed in November. Either the DOJ head is incompetent or she's following some direction from her boss.

---

So who should pick the head of the DOJ? Strange comment.

How is she incompetent? Because Massie let Ro bait him into an impossible scope and timeline?

Massie can issue all the subpoenas he wants, no judge will enforce them against the DOJ who is actively complying with the act, excluding the ******ed unenforceable non-contemplated timeframe.

---

I think the timeline is one of the biggest issues.

If you figure 15 million pages, they were given 30 days to release them. So, that's a legal review of 500K pages per day. If you stuck 1000 lawyers on this that's 500 pages per lawyer per day for review AND analysis as to what can or should be redacted.

I don't think that kind of expectation is feasible.

---

I have little sympathy for the DC bureaucrats who delayed this as much as possible before the vote forced them to comply with the will of the American people.

---

So you don't have sympathy? Well, that's good but it doesn't change the facts of reviewing 15 million pages for a variety of things. And then at same time produce rationale for any redaction according to the act.

Sometimes you have to deal with reality and reality is Massie created a mess and now wants everyone to join him in wrastlin around in his ****pile.

They are complying with the will of the American people. Whats the rush?

Ervin Burrell said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

I think we're all on the same page here. You seem to be insinuating that Trump has full control over the release of the files, which isn't the case. I don't believe that Trump is in those files that would implicate him at all, and you seem to disagree.

---

Trump pitched a fit all last year over the files and threatened anybody pushing for their release, then when the vote was forced his hand picked DOJ head failed to follow the law he signed in November. Either the DOJ head is incompetent or she's following some direction from her boss.

---

So who should pick the head of the DOJ? Strange comment.

How is she incompetent? Because Massie let Ro bait him into an impossible scope and timeline?

Massie can issue all the subpoenas he wants, no judge will enforce them against the DOJ who is actively complying with the act, excluding the ******ed unenforceable non-contemplated timeframe.

---

I think the timeline is one of the biggest issues.

If you figure 15 million pages, they were given 30 days to release them. So, that's a legal review of 500K pages per day. If you stuck 1000 lawyers on this that's 500 pages per lawyer per day for review AND analysis as to what can or should be redacted.

I don't think that kind of expectation is feasible.

---

We've gone from "release all the files!" to "the files don't exist!" to "there's 15 million of them, so many that we're drowning in them."

---

Oh...horse*****

If your lefties that were in office for 4 years had anything on Trump they would have plastered them all over the media.

They have said there were a ton of documents for a long time - HENCE the bill to have them release them.

However, I think OF ALL THINGS that both the right and left are focused on, this should be issue number 69420...

Something must be coming if the MAGA disciples are saying there was no pedofilia:

Nick Fuentes claims Jeffrey Epstein’s international trafficking operation should not be labeled “pedophilia,” because it did not involve very young children.

He says the victims were “barely legal” teenagers.

The same statement has also been made by Alan Dershowitz. pic.twitter.com/CfBRyObIXC

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) January 14, 2026

You think Fuentes is a "MAGA disciple"? LOL

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Something must be coming if the MAGA disciples are saying there was no pedofilia:

Nick Fuentes claims Jeffrey Epstein’s international trafficking operation should not be labeled “pedophilia,” because it did not involve very young children.

He says the victims were “barely legal” teenagers.

The same statement has also been made by Alan Dershowitz. pic.twitter.com/CfBRyObIXC

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) January 14, 2026

---

Megyn Kelly made the same argument.

THE_CHOSEN_ONE said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Something must be coming if the MAGA disciples are saying there was no pedofilia:

Nick Fuentes claims Jeffrey Epstein’s international trafficking operation should not be labeled “pedophilia,” because it did not involve very young children.

He says the victims were “barely legal” teenagers.

The same statement has also been made by Alan Dershowitz. pic.twitter.com/CfBRyObIXC

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) January 14, 2026

---

Megyn Kelly made the same argument.

---

You think Megyn Kelly is a "MAGA disciple"? LOL

Howdy, I'm back. Still no files. Shocking.

I assume theyre still following the law as intended, right maga? I'm not trolling. At what point do maga / conservatives grow a spine and stop defending this farce?

It's so in our face at this point it would be funny if it wasnt such a heinous topic.

Psst, Denmark…

Tell this administration the Epstein files are in Greenland… they’ll lose all interest and will never be able to find it.

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

TRM said:

---

Psst, Denmark…

Tell this administration the Epstein files are in Greenland… they’ll lose all interest and will never be able to find it.

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 15, 2026

---

He's no longer even making sense. Perhaps Senator Fetterman can provide some direction on mental health services available to Massie.

What an odd little man.