flown-the-coop said:
Yea, not on board with your Jade Helm analysis of Epstein.
I bet you will be when a Democrat is back in office.
flown-the-coop said:
Yea, not on board with your Jade Helm analysis of Epstein.
why would it matter who is in office?FWTXAg said:flown-the-coop said:
Yea, not on board with your Jade Helm analysis of Epstein.
I bet you will be when a Democrat is back in office.
flown-the-coop said:why would it matter who is in office?FWTXAg said:flown-the-coop said:
Yea, not on board with your Jade Helm analysis of Epstein.
I bet you will be when a Democrat is back in office.
FWTXAg said:flown-the-coop said:FWTXAg said:flown-the-coop said:
Yea, not on board with your Jade Helm analysis of Epstein.
I bet you will be when a Democrat is back in office.
why would it matter who is in office?
It doesn't matter who is in office, that's the entire point.
Politics are a charade for people who believe that these wealthy political actors on either side actually care about the common American. Anyone who has access to the internet should know believing in or even voting for these people makes literally zero difference and never will, because they aren't the ones making decisions.
Keyno said:FWTXAg said:flown-the-coop said:FWTXAg said:flown-the-coop said:
Yea, not on board with your Jade Helm analysis of Epstein.
I bet you will be when a Democrat is back in office.
why would it matter who is in office?
It doesn't matter who is in office, that's the entire point.
Politics are a charade for people who believe that these wealthy political actors on either side actually care about the common American. Anyone who has access to the internet should know believing in or even voting for these people makes literally zero difference and never will, because they aren't the ones making decisions.
Well said. Hard to believe more people don't realize this
Quote:
US justice department has released less than 1% of Epstein files, filing reveals
Federal law required majority of documents to be released by 19 December, but only 125,575 pages have been published
The Department of Justice has released less than 1% of the so-called Epstein files, a court filing has revealed, as Democrats step up criticism of the Trump administration's "lawlessness" for keeping records under seal.
The department conceded that only 12,285 documents, totalling 125,575 pages, relating to the disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epsteinhave been published to date, despite a federal law requiring the vast majority to be released by 19 December.
The biggest problem isn't they're missing the deadlines, it's what they're redacting.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 8, 2026
They're citing the Privacy Act, and pretending it overrides a law we just passed. They also say they don't have to release internal deliberations, but our bill specifically says they must. pic.twitter.com/Y6lqR51n5i
🚨 JUST IN:
— Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) January 8, 2026
Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna just told a federal court the DOJ cannot be trusted to release the full Epstein files.
They’re urging a judge to appoint an independent monitor to force disclosure, citing missing documents, improper redactions, and DOJ… pic.twitter.com/rFv6gpylUK
Ag with kids said:
More proof that Massie is actually a closet democrat...
PaulsBunions said:Ag with kids said:
More proof that Massie is actually a closet democrat...
or the Republican leadership fumbled this issue so hard that even the Democrats can get it right lol
Ag with kids said:PaulsBunions said:Ag with kids said:
More proof that Massie is actually a closet democrat...
or the Republican leadership fumbled this issue so hard that even the Democrats can get it right lol
Nah...
Just yet another issue he votes lockstep with the Democrats on...
Ag with kids said:PaulsBunions said:Ag with kids said:
More proof that Massie is actually a closet democrat...
or the Republican leadership fumbled this issue so hard that even the Democrats can get it right lol
Nah...
Just yet another issue he votes lockstep with the Democrats on...
Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don't talk about it.
— JD Vance (@JDVance) September 4, 2021
PaulsBunions said:Ag with kids said:PaulsBunions said:Ag with kids said:
More proof that Massie is actually a closet democrat...
or the Republican leadership fumbled this issue so hard that even the Democrats can get it right lol
Nah...
Just yet another issue he votes lockstep with the Democrats on...
Today's Republicans are just yesterday's democrats i guessRemember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don't talk about it.
— JD Vance (@JDVance) September 4, 2021
Ag with kids said:PaulsBunions said:Ag with kids said:PaulsBunions said:Ag with kids said:
More proof that Massie is actually a closet democrat...
or the Republican leadership fumbled this issue so hard that even the Democrats can get it right lol
Nah...
Just yet another issue he votes lockstep with the Democrats on...
Today's Republicans are just yesterday's democrats i guessRemember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don't talk about it.
— JD Vance (@JDVance) September 4, 2021
I made my comments because of his history of votes. This is just the latest issue he's voted lock step with the Dems...
flown-the-coop said:
He ranks a zero on my America First score, so what's the point? Some ultra right wing rag gives him a grade because he votes with the Dems over some virtue signaling about the debt or a military authorization?
Voting with Ds is voting against Rs. Rs are the team and coach I voted for to fix the Biden debacles. Massie is against that effort.
Who cares what his flippin liberty score is. His actions, commentary and voting over the past year are at odds with the party in power and what most all of us voted for.
Massie is down to his last months as a congresss critter and he can go back to tinkering with a soldering iron.
PaulsBunions said:
This is how you got uniparty neocons running this country into the ground. No thanks.
AgDev01 said:PaulsBunions said:
This is how you got uniparty neocons running this country into the ground. No thanks.
I wonder how many of these MAGA folks go to bed at night wondering what socialist positions they will be supporting in the morning in order to stay lockstep with whatever rambling Trump was spitting out on social media the night before.
Maybe one day they will realize it isn't folks like Massie who has changed, it is them.
AgDev01 said:PaulsBunions said:
This is how you got uniparty neocons running this country into the ground. No thanks.
I wonder how many of these MAGA folks go to bed at night wondering what socialist positions they will be supporting in the morning in order to stay lockstep with whatever rambling Trump was spitting out on social media the night before.
Maybe one day they will realize it isn't folks like Massie who has changed, it is them.
Quote:
Neocons (neoconservatives) are a political movement, originally liberal Democrats disillusioned with the left, who shifted rightward, advocating for strong military, assertive democracy promotion, and interventionist foreign policy, supporting democracy globally, even with force, and emphasizing U.S. interests, with key figures like Irving Kristol shaping their pro-democracy, anti-communist stance. They favor individual liberty, free markets, and traditional values but are best known for their muscular foreign policy, supporting military action for national security and spreading democratic ideals, prominent under Reagan and Bush, especially post-9/11.
Core Beliefs & Ideology
Foreign Policy: Assertive, interventionist, promoting democracy and U.S. interests globally, using military force when necessary (e.g., Iraq, Afghanistan).
National Security: Strong military, preemptive action against threats, clear distinction between allies and adversaries.
Domestic Policy: Support for traditional values, free markets, individual liberty, but often critical of big government's social engineering.
Origins: Evolved from anti-Stalinist leftists in the 1960s, reacting to liberalism's perceived radical shift, embracing conservatism after "reality" challenged liberal ideals.
No True Scotsman Fallacy.PaulsBunions said:flown-the-coop said:
He ranks a zero on my America First score, so what's the point? Some ultra right wing rag gives him a grade because he votes with the Dems over some virtue signaling about the debt or a military authorization?
Voting with Ds is voting against Rs. Rs are the team and coach I voted for to fix the Biden debacles. Massie is against that effort.
Who cares what his flippin liberty score is. His actions, commentary and voting over the past year are at odds with the party in power and what most all of us voted for.
Massie is down to his last months as a congresss critter and he can go back to tinkering with a soldering iron.
"Who cares if he votes conservatively he should be a party loyalist like the rest of the stooges"
This is how you got uniparty neocons running this country into the ground. No thanks.
Queso1 said:
What's this Sascha Riley stuff going around on X?
Queso1 said:
I'm not linking people to these. That's why I came here. I didn't start a new thread. I saw the name of r/Epstein and on X.
All I've heard is that he was 6 years old and he claims that his stepfather trafficked him to Epstein. I can't get any other information.
Queso1 said:
You mean like how the whole Epstein story broke in the first place?
Quote:
The Jeffrey Epstein story first broke in March 2005 when the family of a 14-year-old girl reported to the Palm Beach, Florida police that he had molested their daughter at his mansion. This initial report launched the first police investigation into his activities.