DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

509,499 Views | 5860 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by FWTXAg
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ed Harley said:

flown-the-coop said:

We struck a nerve with some.

At the end of the day, what's there is there. If there is enough smoke on a redaction or set thereof, there will be enough clamoring to overcome.

Instead we have seen Bubba Hot Tub and his merry band of swimming phillies and then moaning about redactions (oddly silent they were when Dems faked redactions just weeks ago) and fake allegations Dersh submitted in defense.

They will never rest until Trump is dead and their Uniparty woobies are reinstalled.

People need to recognize the enemy.


I'm convinced that you have no idea that Trump is the one who wanted these files released when he campaigned on it. It's the only way to make sense of your barely decipherable posts.

I am convinced you are unable to read posts that are plain in their text. All I said the files are the files, *****ing about redactions is pointless, particularly when some of it was leaked. Even if it was previously leaked, Massie-Ro stunt may reset the standard that the files had to be reviewed by. Again, they were amateur in their stunt, or purposefully amateur.

But no one can deny more information is out there since Jan 21, 2025 than has ever previously been out there. Simply a fact.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

aggiedata said:





I mean, they asked for it, right?

Now its hang Trump and Bondi from the gallows for missing arbitrary unenforceable deadline and being overly precautious in redactions.

As long as libs continue to never change, I think they can and will be defeated. Giddy up.
Ed Harley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Ed Harley said:

flown-the-coop said:

We struck a nerve with some.

At the end of the day, what's there is there. If there is enough smoke on a redaction or set thereof, there will be enough clamoring to overcome.

Instead we have seen Bubba Hot Tub and his merry band of swimming phillies and then moaning about redactions (oddly silent they were when Dems faked redactions just weeks ago) and fake allegations Dersh submitted in defense.

They will never rest until Trump is dead and their Uniparty woobies are reinstalled.

People need to recognize the enemy.


I'm convinced that you have no idea that Trump is the one who wanted these files released when he campaigned on it. It's the only way to make sense of your barely decipherable posts.

I am convinced you are unable to read posts that are plain in their text. All I said the files are the files, *****ing about redactions is pointless, particularly when some of it was leaked. Even if it was previously leaked, Massie-Ro stunt may reset the standard that the files had to be reviewed by. Again, they were amateur in their stunt, or purposefully amateur.

But no one can deny more information is out there since Jan 21, 2025 than has ever previously been out there. Simply a fact.

No one can deny that Trump tried like hell to conceal this "more information since Jan 21,2025" and only released it (90% redacted) after being ordered, amirite?

In other words, for those following along at home and who need it spelled out (looking at you, flown-the-coop), this sudden transparency wasn't for a lack of trying against it by Trump.

In other, other words, despite your protestations to the contrary, Trump is not wearing the white hat in this.

ETA: flown-the-coop really sorry that this post will inevitably lead to you spending 18 hours/day defending Trump. But we both know that's what's going to happen. It's just who you are and no one can take that away from you.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So what exactly are you butthurt about? That your perception is Trump stonewalled (not backed by reality) and you think stuff is "90% redacted"?

The bitterness in your posting is just bizarre as are your quite personal rants on me. Move on bruh.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obviously you don't agree with ftc. And with this fact your viewpoint in the matter differs from ftc.

In light of these facts, what exactly is the **** show?
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

So what exactly are you butthurt about? That your perception is Trump stonewalled (not backed by reality) and you think stuff is "90% redacted"?

The bitterness in your posting is just bizarre as are your quite personal rants on me. Move on bruh.

You do not think Trump has tried stonewalling here?

When they did the big influencer file release, he and the admin tried to act like that was a big file dump...when in reality, everything that was "released" that day was already publicly available.

Then at different points this year, he has said there are "no files," the files are a "scam," they are a "democrat hoax," etc.

If you think he is being totally honest and the handling of this situation has been completely above board, that is interesting.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am glad you find my take "interesting". Though I have to admit it's a pretty simple take.

Over and over again the "hoax" comments have been explained. Vomiting it up doesn't change the fact the information has been consumed.

I think 90% redacted may be hyperbole but you then now have dumb claims of "breaking the law by missing deadline" and "breaking law cause you didn't take more time to fully redact" and then "broke the law by redacting too much".

As I said earlier. **** show.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

The DOJ is still breaking the law. More at 11.


I should have never mentioned the Miami game. Speaking of farces...
derp
Concerned Moderate Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:



In light of these facts, what exactly is the **** show?


They appear to be redacting everything but victim info. Does that count?
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

I am glad you find my take "interesting". Though I have to admit it's a pretty simple take.

Over and over again the "hoax" comments have been explained. Vomiting it up doesn't change the fact the information has been consumed.

I think 90% redacted may be hyperbole but you then now have dumb claims of "breaking the law by missing deadline" and "breaking law cause you didn't take more time to fully redact" and then "broke the law by redacting too much".

As I said earlier. **** show.

What do you mean re: hoax comments? What was the explanation for that?

**** show all around.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgResearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:




See more of himself? Relive the "good old days" when he was pulling hot tail and avoiding Hillary
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?




More incompetence from the DOJ lol
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Regardless of whether you are a die hard MAGA Trump disciple or you think he's the antichrist that was complicit in all this...can we simply acknowledge exactly WHY the DOJ is trying desperately to not comply with the law and disclose information about this case? It's not all about Trump. It never was....

HS Mike Johnson stated that releasing the Epstein files without proper redactions "could cause
national security issues?"
You don't say? Why don't you explain to the American f****ing public how that could be? An interstate p##dophile ring has national security implications?

Still waiting but think I can deduce the answer.TIA
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:



A smart move by ole slick willy. This is probably his only move. There might be enough left hidden to completely burn him, but likely even more that would burn even more down that will never be allowed to see the light of day.

I guess we will see how serious everyone is when this admin is done... if Trump is stonewalling it will all come out January 2029. Be willing to bet it is "meet the new guy, same as the old guy" on this topic.
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is quickly becoming my no. 1 issue. I always suspected it went deep and this was a cover up. I always suspected the elites were participating in this stuff. I think the slow drip over the last few years has immunized us from absolute outrage we should have for this whole thing and the cover up.

ETA: I never thought I'd side with Chuck Schumer. But here we are. I voted for Trump because he said he'd release the files. That crap with Bondi and the binders? What a ****ing snow job so far.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/22/epstein-files-doj-schumer-trump-democrats.html
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Queso1 said:

This is quickly becoming my no. 1 issue. I always suspected it went deep and this was a cover up. I always suspected the elites were participating in this stuff. I think the slow drip over the last few years has immunized us from absolute outrage we should have for this whole thing and the cover up.

ETA: I never thought I'd side with Chuck Schumer. But here we are. I voted for Trump because he said he'd release the files. That crap with Bondi and the binders? What a ****ing snow job so far.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/22/epstein-files-doj-schumer-trump-democrats.html



Corruption and the shadow government is the ONLY issue. All the social stuff is literally a waste of your time and life. Expose how corrupt our system is and burn the entire thing down, burn the federal government and start back at the local level.

Centralized government is an abomination rife for corruption against the average American citizen. Trump, Obama, Clinton, AOC, Mike Johnson are all on the same team. Run them out of town.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?


"I thought we were done with transparency after Republicans took power"

Uniparty gonna uniparty
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Good Ag right here.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
unimboti nkum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The idiots and simpletons at the DOJ also released a fake Epstein suicide video from 2019. Nice work!

https://people.com/jeffrey-epstein-prison-suicide-video-fake-11874935
Soso nikinombiki maaki dii.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AtticusMatlock said:

Epstein was a networking guru who cozied up to everyone he could. It's unlikely the majority or even a significant number of the people he was friends with, or took pictures with, had any idea what he was doing with the young women.

He wasn't just a guy running an underaged brothel. He was a wealthy guy with a charming personality who befriended everyone he possibly could.

I hate that people are assuming that anyone who took a picture with him or went to dinner with him somewhere with somehow involved. That's not really how he operated.


How did he get his wealth? No one on Wall Street or the various commodities exchanges knew who he was or did business with him. Being a good networker MAY put you in a position to make a decent living -- high 5 or low 6 figure income -- but it doesn't explain Epstein's situation or contacts.

I agree that appearing in a picture with him doesn't mean that person actively participated, but to assume -- or even argue -- the "majority" of people he dealt with didn't have at least an idea of what was going on is, at best, obtuse.
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As we close in on page 156, let's not forget the title of this thread. A highly connected predator killed himself while housed in a secured jail.

Please continue…
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And, his CIA-linked partner is still residing in Bryan.

Forum Troll
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:





More incompetence from the DOJ lol


This is making the rounds on r/law

Clown show admin.
Retired FBI Agent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://tips.fbi.gov/
1-800-225-5324
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
unimboti nkum said:

The idiots and simpletons at the DOJ also released a fake Epstein suicide video from 2019. Nice work!

https://people.com/jeffrey-epstein-prison-suicide-video-fake-11874935



To be fair. they are supposed to release all the materials they had, IIRC the email with that video said something like "hey this fake video is going around the internet". They knew it was fake and never claimed it wasn't
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So far we have a ton of new pics of Bubba and Jeff, Ghislaine shooting rockets at gorillas, alongside dizzying claims of "they forgot to redact names", "all they did was redact everything", "they didn't release everything!", "they released a fake video", and then accusations of clown show at the DOJ.

Never stop tabloid brigade. Walls are closing in!

And not nary a peep about what any of this means regards to justice for the victims - which many of those criticizing Trump said was all they were looking for.

Also, need to look no further than recent posts for what is wrong with the deep state DOJ.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SidetrackAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

So far we have a ton of new pics of Bubba and Jeff, Ghislaine shooting rockets at gorillas, alongside dizzying claims of "they forgot to redact names", "all they did was redact everything", "they didn't release everything!", "they released a fake video", and then accusations of clown show at the DOJ.

Never stop tabloid brigade. Walls are closing in!

And not nary a peep about what any of this means regards to justice for the victims - which many of those criticizing Trump said was all they were looking for.

Also, need to look no further than recent posts for what is wrong with the deep state DOJ.


The walls really are closing in this time, Trump's legacy, whatever that was worth, is FINISHED. By the way, that's the only thing he cares about, he's about to self destruct.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2 more weeks?

He does care about this being a distraction, but it does not impact his legacy. Just what do you think is going on here?

I would love to hear what your imagination has conjured up regarding Trump and the "Epstein files" saga.
First Page Last Page
Page 155 of 168
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.