DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

746,131 Views | 7744 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Im Gipper
Burpelson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like the BIG STALL is about to happen!
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
93MarineHorn said:

Dan Carlin said:

flown-the-coop said:

You should admire Trump for standing up to the media, calling them out, shaming them when they deserve so much more.

To say manipulating is to imply nefarious intent in this context, but you knew that, intended that.

And I beg that Trump become more authoritarian. This Country needs him.


I give you props for owning that you desire an autocrat who wants to attack the pillars of freedom of our country. Most of folks who desire this won't say it out loud. I don't, however.

What pillars of freedom are under attack? Please give specifics or stfu.

From the group who wanted people who refused the experimental "vaccine' to be fired (at a minimum) and for their families to suffer immensely.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burpelson said:

Looks like the BIG STALL is about to happen!


Info or links? I haven't been paying attention to news today.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I only caught part of the question to Bondi and now Trump is rambling on at the Kennedy Center.

But the question was, I believe, around when the DOJ would be releasing files and she alluded to an ongoing current investigation based on "recent" emergence of evidence but would not elaborate.

Combine with the corrupt media coordinating the next talking points (that admittedly Bondi's remarks play right into) are that Trump will redact and hold back information that incriminates him claiming ongoing investigation.

Our gal Sonny Hostin over at The View is peddling just such nonsense this morning. More and more articles claiming similar are popping up steadily.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Bondi just indicated during a presser on the Canadian "Snow" King that there is new information and a new SDNY open investigation related to Epstein.

No details at this point or how this may impact any release of information.

Cue the "this is how Trump will cover his own arse", but it may also be related to information that came from the Epstein estate, as much of the most recent information has come from.

Where have you been?

Trump explicitly called for her to reopen this to look in to all the democrats. So she did, like two hours later. Never mind they already publicly closed that case.

There is no "Cue", that's what they're doing?


Anyway, it's done in the Senate, time for Trump to sign.

That is not consistent with what she said. Its not a matter of "where have you been", she literally just said it.

Yes. We've all been saying this is exactly what would happen and the only reason Trump called on he to reopen an investigation. It's a farce, top to bottom. I will say, sorry if you're just reporting it as "new news", but they already telegraphed this extremely hard.

she had the files
there are no files
it's a hoax
trump isn't named
it's a hoax
it's democrats
reopen the investigation you closed (only democrats* explicitly)
(it's not a hoax?)
all the while flip flopping so hard he called a congress person a traitor.

This is 100% a stall by Trump.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Q: "The DOJ statement earlier this year saying that the Epstein files would not be released mentioned the fact that the review of the documents and the evidence did not suggest that any additional investigation of third parties was warranted. What changed since then that you launched this investigation?"

Bondi: "Information that has come forward. Information. There's information, new information additional information. And again, we will continue to follow the law."


MMMMM K.
unimboti nkum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bill passed the Senate. This is getting veeery interesting
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Got em!

or as I clearly pointed out we can await a more comprehensive statement.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
what does Marjorie Traitor Greene pivot to once the Epstein files are "released"?

that there were redactions to protect the victim's names? and they should all be released so the entire planet knows who they are?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Example of Epstein Files:

From: donaldodepedito@trump.com
To: jeevacation@gmail.com; geemax@ellmax.com

My best friends, please do not share anything about the times I went to Pedo... I mean Epstein Island and had relations with underage girls. Those things are not relevant to my desires to be President and ultimately King of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Donald J. Trump
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Example of Epstein Files:

From: donaldodepedito@trump.com
To: jeevacation@gmail.com; geemax@ellmax.com

My best friends, please do not share anything about the times I went to Pedo... I mean Epstein Island and had relations with underage girls. Those things are not relevant to my desires to be President and ultimately King of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Donald J. Trump



You are fake news.

Drain the Swamp.
Dan Carlin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's incredible how many GOP faithful are so eager to hide the dirty details of Bill Clinton cavorting with Jeffrey Epstein! What a bizzaro turn of events.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Concerned Moderate Ag said:

Dan Carlin said:

DannyDuberstein said:

Goaltending isn't required when we know if there is anything in there, the Biden admin would have burned him down with it. So no goaltending, just one ounce of basic logic


I'm sure the Biden administration was protecting their favorite people too! Why is this so hard to comprehend that there is bipartisan support behind squelching the names of perpetrators? Bill Clinton and Bill Gates ought to have the Prince Andrew treatment before this is all done.


No matter how many times this is explained they're going to continue to ignore it. The primary reason to hold and not use your nukes is the other side has nukes too.

But they'll keep trotting out their weak reasoning that Biden didn't release information he had.

So the left took Trump to court umpteen other times with made up cases, but they had actual information linking him to real crimes and didn't use it because they were afraid that the Republicans would retaliate?

But, not for the umpteen other times, just for that one...

Brilliant logic.
Ducks4brkfast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dan Carlin said:

It's incredible how many GOP faithful are so eager to hide the dirty details of Bill Clinton cavorting with Jeffrey Epstein! What a bizzaro turn of events.

Who and where are all these people? Congress just voted 527-1 to release the files.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

Concerned Moderate Ag said:

Dan Carlin said:

DannyDuberstein said:

Goaltending isn't required when we know if there is anything in there, the Biden admin would have burned him down with it. So no goaltending, just one ounce of basic logic


I'm sure the Biden administration was protecting their favorite people too! Why is this so hard to comprehend that there is bipartisan support behind squelching the names of perpetrators? Bill Clinton and Bill Gates ought to have the Prince Andrew treatment before this is all done.


No matter how many times this is explained they're going to continue to ignore it. The primary reason to hold and not use your nukes is the other side has nukes too.

But they'll keep trotting out their weak reasoning that Biden didn't release information he had.

So the left took Trump to court umpteen other times with made up cases, but they had actual information linking him to real crimes and didn't use it because they were afraid that the Republicans would retaliate?

But, not for the umpteen other times, just for that one...

Brilliant logic.


Yeah, it makes no sense. The goal was to prevent him from being elected. They pulled out all the stops to make that happen, but had real crimes that would have prevented him being elected and refused to use them!

They would have released the stuff on Trump, held back the other, and it would have never seen the light of day after Harris took office. In fact, it would have been destroyed, like they did with the disk drives crashing during IRS gate and with Hillary's server that was bit bleached!
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:





Will need a citation on the "unredacted records". I think that's fake news.

From the WSJ:

Quote:

The bill allows the attorney general to withhold or redact victims' personal and medical information, anything that contains child pornography, information that would jeopardize an active investigation and images of death or abuse. It requires the Justice Department to justify its redactions to Congress.


So I hope everyone is ready to be disappointed all over again.
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

PaulsBunions said:





Will need a citation on the "unredacted records". I think that's fake news.

From the WSJ:

Quote:

The bill allows the attorney general to withhold or redact victims' personal and medical information, anything that contains child pornography, information that would jeopardize an active investigation and images of death or abuse. It requires the Justice Department to justify its redactions to Congress.


So I hope everyone is ready to be disappointed all over again.



My body is ready. But at least this pushes more and more people to openly distrust these piles of human excrement on all sides of the political spectrum.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Counterpoint: if this is his only achievement then I give him an A+ because that means he hasn't been driving new legislation that either raised costs or increased tyranny.

Gridlock is good.

(I have no idea what this guy has or hasn't done IRL in Congress.)
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:



Dont know who Bill Mitchell is but he sounds like a complete dim wit.

This could be the biggest bombshell ever against the swamp...Trump said he wanted to drain the swamp...I'm OD'ing on popcorn. Let's roll
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
this is a story that will NEVER end because to the fevered swamp conspiracy theorists

there will ALWAYS be a coverup

no matter how much is released.

have any of you thought about what the @#$@# this is REALLY about?

a guy dead for five years- committed crimes 15 years ago against private citizens.

what do the cultists EXPECT to happen out of all this in 2026?!

it would literally be a better use of time for the conspiracy nuts to return back to focusing on Area 51 and aliens!
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Counterpoint: if this is his only achievement then I give him an A+ because that means he hasn't been driving new legislation that either raised costs or increased tyranny.

Gridlock is good.

(I have no idea what this guy has or hasn't done IRL in Congress.)


People generally criticize Massie for not being able to pass anything rather than the content of the bills he puts forward because they can't find any valid criticisms of the content. The question isn't why hasn't he had anything passed but why don't other so-called "Conservatives" vote for them.

Some examples:





techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

this is a story that will NEVER end because to the fevered swamp conspiracy theorists

there will ALWAYS be a coverup

no matter how much is released.

have any of you thought about what the @#$@# this is REALLY about?

a guy dead for five years- committed crimes 15 years ago against private citizens.

what do the cultists EXPECT to happen out of all this in 2026?!

it would literally be a better use of time for the conspiracy nuts to return back to focusing on Area 51 and aliens!

Would you say it's…
















QAnonish?
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now we can play qanon (not really, just release every GD thing) but this is... well...:



1) Campaign on releasing files

2) Halt SDNY investigation, send all files to DC

3) Have 1000+ agents scour files for Trump's name

4) Suddenly, quietly kill ongoing investigations

5) Realize that Congress will force you to release files

6) Quickly open new SDNY investigation

^taken from similar thread. Pam looked like a hostage and talked just the same. I think they are ****ing things up, or already have and she knows it. Just my take!

EDIT: And again, not that it matters in the long run. Copies of this are with the courts all over the place.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Who is dumber, this lady or that one dem who thought Guam would tip over if too many people were on it
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

This could be the biggest bombshell ever against the swamp


And you could be the queen of France.


Care to wager on how both play out?

I'm Gipper
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Have we see them in the same room at the same time?

But you are thinking of Hank Dockamintz Johnson, the Distinguishably Illiterate Congressfolk from Georgia.

torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe these files could be used for a new installment of "American Crime Story". Not just the trafficking by Epstein and Maxwell, but the peddling of influence and corruption. Hell, they could easily have ten seasons worth of material.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

This could be the biggest bombshell ever against the swamp


And you could be the queen of France.


Care to wager on how both play out?


Larry Summers and his pedo buds appreciate your support
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sid Farkas said:

Im Gipper said:

Quote:

This could be the biggest bombshell ever against the swamp


And you could be the queen of France.


Care to wager on how both play out?


Larry Summers and his pedo buds appreciate your support

I don't support Pedos. You are sick for even suggesting it.

I said long long ago these flies should be released.


bIggesT bOMbSHEll EVAH!

I'm Gipper
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

Sid Farkas said:

Im Gipper said:

Quote:

This could be the biggest bombshell ever against the swamp


And you could be the queen of France.


Care to wager on how both play out?


Larry Summers and his pedo buds appreciate your support

I don't support Pedos. You are sick for even suggesting it.

I said long long ago these flies should be released.


bIggesT bOMbSHEll EVAH!



What happened to you Gip? You started off this thread pretty well and have driven off of a cliff since then.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most importantly, we may find out if this is true or not…

https://nypost.com/2025/11/19/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-victim-describes-his-*****-as-extremely-deformed-lemon-shaped/

You'll have to account for TexAgs "profanity" filter to read the story, lol.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not a biologist.
First Page Last Page
Page 134 of 222
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.