***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

589,529 Views | 4123 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by bobbranco
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Aggie Jurist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
. . . and who exactly has standing to challenge the move of the FBI? answer - nobody.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Finally... 1.5 years later... All TPS designations are able to be revoked.


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Free article. Good one. Hope he's right.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
ttha_aggie_09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In honor of the ghost gun:

Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost guns won our independence. Really makes you think
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SG Sauer took a proverbial wrecking ball to the injunction/standing/plaintiff/case against the ball room;


This one's fun.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A sordid lawfare tale around the Trump EO specifying mail in ballot handling by the USPS.
Quote:

The last issue Judge Nichols took up was the claim that EO 14,399 is facially unlawful i.e., that it is an "ultra vires" exercise of authority because the President has no authority over the matters about which the EO directs action to be taken. But Judge Nichols points out that the EO, by its very terms, directs that agency action be. take only to the extent it complies with existing law. The EO does not direct how voter registration be conducted or how mail-in ballots will be handled, it does not intrude on the limits the plaintiffs claim exist. Because the directive is that action be taken only in compliance with the law, the EO is not, acting alone, a violation of any limitation on his authority.

My plan originally in writing this article was to contrast Judge Nichols approach in dealing with the challenges to EO No. 14,399 with the approach taken by Judge Talwani in Boston.

I'm sure no reader of mine would be shocked to learn that Judge Talwani saw the end of civilization as we know it to be hidden in the text of the EO, and granted injunctive relief to California and the other states who ran to the District of Massachusetts for protection from the EO.

But Judge Talwani's approach to resolving the issues addressed by Judge Nichols is so ridiculous that it requires an article all its own. That will be coming in Part Two.

techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/08/21/supreme-court-trump-white-house-ballroom.html

Roberts lets construction continue while the trial plays out. Build that thing as fast as possible.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
japantiger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
nortex97 said:

SG Sauer took a proverbial wrecking ball to the injunction/standing/plaintiff/case against the ball room;


This one's fun.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Bad words for Catholic Legal Immigration Network. @Clinic is their x handle.
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Demand in one hand…
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They need to be dismantled as partisan political entities. They are working against America's interests.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She's the go to for the looniest rulings
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Indira makes no pretense of trying to appear unbiased. At least the 9th is no longer such a cess pool of partisans akin to her;

His article is paywalled but really this should be a pretty simple one on appeal from her order once she releases it:
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Standing seems to be becoming less and less important to the court. Unfortunate. The 'Roberts' effect on the rule of law. Doesn't bode well for the republic. But he couldn't even honestly call a tax a tax, so whatever. Jonathan Gruber could not be reached for comment.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Standing seems to be becoming less and less important to the court. Unfortunate. The 'Roberts' effect on the rule of law. Doesn't bode well for the republic. But he couldn't even honestly call a tax a tax, so whatever. Jonathan Gruber could not be reached for comment.


Standing only matters when you are suing to protect election integrity.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

nortex97 said:

Standing seems to be becoming less and less important to the court. Unfortunate. The 'Roberts' effect on the rule of law. Doesn't bode well for the republic. But he couldn't even honestly call a tax a tax, so whatever. Jonathan Gruber could not be reached for comment.


Standing only matters when you are suing to protect election integrity politically convenient.

It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dvldog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SIAP
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does this make Talwani's ruling null
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dvldog said:

SIAP


Yuge. Except Runbeck will just print the ballots they need to count, regardless of whether they come by mail or not. Can't force corrupt elections officials to throw out fake ballots they want to include.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?



nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah this is great and all but Talwani and her DSA Commie clients states will just issue a final injunction in very short order around the final rule.


The crayola writer's dissent is pretty funny though.
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wish we had a TA legalese translator.
I don't think you know me.

ETA: Proud member of Billy's cesspool.
First Page Last Page
Page 112 of 118 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.