***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

589,519 Views | 4123 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by bobbranco
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BusterAg • 10:01a, 10/1/26
Democrats don't believe in the Constitution at all.
Reply Quote
6
PaulsBunions
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:23a, 10/1/26
AG
Reply Quote
1
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 12:03p, 10/1/26
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
Democrats don't believe in the Constitution at all.

Sure they do. Don't you remember when a district judge from Minnesota named Dwight D Eisenhower was the Supreme Allied Commander for DDay and later went on to be president?

/s
Reply Quote
2
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:19p, 10/1/26
Gorsuch has been pretty good, really only a few bad decisions.

Kavanaugh is okay.

Barrett was okay, but has turned worse this last term. Still better than who she replaced.

Trump's just mad that they don't rule how he wants them to 100% of the time.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:39p, 10/1/26
AG
Barrett is afraid she'll be shunned on the cocktail circuit. Happens to a lot of SCOTUS judges, sad to say.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
6
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 1:41p, 10/1/26
AG
techno-ag said:
Barrett is afraid she'll be shunned on the cocktail circuit. Happens to a lot of SCOTUS judges, sad to say.

She wants to be buddies with Roberts and he HATES Trump. It rubs off on the others sometimes.
Reply Quote
6
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 3:03p, 10/1/26
AG
techno-ag said:
Barrett is afraid she'll be shunned on the cocktail circuit. Happens to a lot of SCOTUS judges, sad to say.


She's afraid her adopted kids will have to go back to Haiti if the immigration stuff shakes out the wrong way.
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 3:16p, 10/1/26
techno-ag said:
Barrett is afraid she'll be shunned on the cocktail circuit. Happens to a lot of SCOTUS judges, sad to say.


Do people really believe this nonsense?

Yeah, she voted to strike down abortion and give Trump immunity. Real worried about cocktail parties!


I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 3:19p, 10/1/26
AG
Im Gipper said:
techno-ag said:
Barrett is afraid she'll be shunned on the cocktail circuit. Happens to a lot of SCOTUS judges, sad to say.


Do people really believe this nonsense?

Yeah, she voted to strike down abortion and give Trump immunity. Real worried about cocktail parties!


Yup. She's changed since the abortion vote.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
4
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 3:21p, 10/1/26
She hasn't changed. You just don't like her rulings. Noting wrong with that.

Has nothing to do with cocktail parties. Yall are so silly sometimes.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
2
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 3:26p, 10/1/26
AG
Im Gipper said:
She hasn't changed. You just don't like her rulings. Noting wrong with that.

Has nothing to do with cocktail parties. Yall are so silly sometimes.

It's an easily perceived pattern. Conservative justices get to SCOTUS. Peer pressure on the social circuit encourage them to side with the libs. This has been going on for decades.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
4
PaulsBunions
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 3:30p, 10/1/26
AG
Im Gipper said:
She hasn't changed. You just don't like her rulings. Noting wrong with that.

Has nothing to do with cocktail parties. Yall are so silly sometimes.


I agree she hasn't changed, she was just a bad pick to begin with.
Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:40p, 10/1/26
Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:43p, 10/1/26
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:20a, 10/3/26

Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:49a, 10/5/26
Reply Quote
7
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:20a, 10/5/26
BIG!


Quote:
This morning the Court accepted the Government's Petition, reversed the Ninth Circuit's decision upholding Judge Chen, and remanded the case back to the Ninth Circuit for further proceedings in consideration of its decision in the Syria and Haiti cases.

This means the Court is done with TPS -- it's not going to consider any of the other challenges involving other countries that were still pending after it reversed the lower courts in the Syria and Haiti cases.

Clean sweep by the Trump Administration on this very important question because one key factor in the Syria and Haiti case was the Court's finding that district courts where the cases all began lacked jurisdiction to hear and decide the claims.

From the Court:

"A provision of the TPS statute, 8 U. S. C. 1254a(b)(5)(A), provides: "There is no judicial review of any determination of the [Secretary of Homeland Security] with respect to the designation, or termination or extension of a designation, of a foreign state under this subsection." This text is clear, and its plain meaning is very broad."

Expect to see these same words repeated in other immigration cases in the Court's new term as more of the lawfare on immigration cases makes its way to SCOTUS.

Reply Quote
9
1 edit
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 1:28p, 10/5/26
AG
will25u said:
BIG!


Quote:
This morning the Court accepted the Government's Petition, reversed the Ninth Circuit's decision upholding Judge Chen, and remanded the case back to the Ninth Circuit for further proceedings in consideration of its decision in the Syria and Haiti cases.

This means the Court is done with TPS -- it's not going to consider any of the other challenges involving other countries that were still pending after it reversed the lower courts in the Syria and Haiti cases.

Clean sweep by the Trump Administration on this very important question because one key factor in the Syria and Haiti case was the Court's finding that district courts where the cases all began lacked jurisdiction to hear and decide the claims.

From the Court:

"A provision of the TPS statute, 8 U. S. C. 1254a(b)(5)(A), provides: "There is no judicial review of any determination of the [Secretary of Homeland Security] with respect to the designation, or termination or extension of a designation, of a foreign state under this subsection." This text is clear, and its plain meaning is very broad."

Expect to see these same words repeated in other immigration cases in the Court's new term as more of the lawfare on immigration cases makes its way to SCOTUS.


Boo-yah!
Puts an end to that delay tactic.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
8
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:10p, 10/5/26
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:11p, 10/8/26




Reply Quote
7
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 2:56p, 10/8/26
AG
will25u said:

Judge's last name checks out.
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:11p, 10/8/26
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:21p, 10/9/26

Reply Quote
6
Deerdude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:30p, 10/9/26
Guatemala and Belize pretty close and they speak the same language.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 1:34p, 10/9/26
There are absolutely not "many" with valid asylum claims who are impacted. That is a lie by the judge.
Reply Quote
2
Mathguy64
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:34p, 10/9/26
AG
So we should let people cross the border because Mexico is a ****hole? Is that how it works? And a judge is the person who can make that decision?

Good grief. If that's the criteria then pretty much anyone from anywhere can come in anytime anywhere. Because pretty much the rest of the world is a ****hole.
Reply Quote
4
Deerdude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:46p, 10/9/26
The real travesty is their exposing themselves to the cartel coyotes to enter illegally.
Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:49p, 10/9/26
Reply Quote
1
bobbranco
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 11:09a, 10/10/26
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
There are absolutely not "many" with valid asylum claims who are impacted. That is a lie by the judge.


Judges are lawyers. Lawyers lie. HTH
Reply Quote
3
First Page Refresh
Page 118 of 118 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.