HTownAg98 said:

---

will25u said:

---

https://t.co/UDDiCrjEWf

— Jennifer Van Laar (@jenvanlaar) November 2, 2026

---

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration’s bid to force California to set aside votes from up to 20,000 registered voters the administration claims are likely noncitizens.

No noted dissent.

w/ @joshgerstein https://t.co/s1Pc5oh1fq

— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) November 2, 2026

That was quick.

---

Can ICE detain illegal aliens pursuant to administrative warrants or, in certain circumstances, without a warrant? No, explains Judge Kasubhai (he/him). Two points (as to both, I am skeptical!): (1) calling on colleagues to haul in more ICE agents for questioning and (2) ... pic.twitter.com/REbQR0HgQb

— Eric W. (@EWess92) November 2, 2026

Read the opinion and order here: https://t.co/aEJsh9PzaI

— Eric W. (@EWess92) November 2, 2026

FTAG 2000 said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

will25u said:

---

https://t.co/UDDiCrjEWf

— Jennifer Van Laar (@jenvanlaar) November 2, 2026

---

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration’s bid to force California to set aside votes from up to 20,000 registered voters the administration claims are likely noncitizens.

No noted dissent.

w/ @joshgerstein https://t.co/s1Pc5oh1fq

— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) November 2, 2026

That was quick.

---

Roberts.

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Yea for illegals voting! You must be thrilled.

---

BREAKING: The full Ninth Circuit has vacated a panel ruling issued just hours earlier that allowed the Trump administration to pressure election officials to set aside ballots from suspected noncitizens under threat of prosecution. An 11-judge panel will now rehear the case. pic.twitter.com/zTSHN9iLAN

— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) November 3, 2026

JUST IN: Judge Tanya Chutkan (Obama/DC) bars DOJ/DHS from sending any more suspected non-citizen voter lists to state/local governments. Opinion: https://t.co/iOp6xVqLTr Order: https://t.co/wVEGVUGit5

— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) November 3, 2026

Big immigration win for President Trump: Is *Temporary* Protected Status in the Ninth Circuit permanent? Four days after refusing to stay a district court's order granting prohibited TPS relief, the panel reverses itself. Haven't seen that before! @DHSgov wins a temporary stay. pic.twitter.com/oXiVMETJ4E

— Eric W. (@EWess92) November 3, 2026

Here is the rundown on what has happened with regard to the TRO entered by Judge Thompson in the Northern District of California, with no notice or opportunity to be heard given to DOJ, that prohibited DOJ from "intimidating" or "threatening" state election workers with regard to…

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) November 3, 2026

Quote:

---

Long post, I recommend reading it in full. It's funny.

---

Can a group of activist organizations and unions get a universal injunction against the Department of Homeland Security to stop investigations of alleged voter fraud by non-citizens? Yes, per the Ninth Circuit. Panel: S.R. Thomas, Wardlaw, and Johnstone. I'm skeptical! pic.twitter.com/1CgS1hCg2m

— Eric W. (@EWess92) November 5, 2026

Also skeptical? Judge Tung, joined by six colleagues, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc. "By enjoining the government from even investigating illegal voting, the district court departed from its limited role—and trampled on the President’s in the process." Strong words! https://t.co/t3XllHCWS9 pic.twitter.com/MWm2i2TPIG

— Eric W. (@EWess92) November 5, 2026

On the Fifth Circuit, Judge Jerry Smith just issued a blistering opinion reversing U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate, who had enjoined Mississippi's ban on DEI in schools. The opinion found Wingate “carelessly exercised his Article III power by issuing sloppy edicts based on…

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) November 5, 2026

So apparently the Director of Arkansas professional programs has been altering bar examination scores for several years by taking points from some bar examinees and adding them to other bar examinees pic.twitter.com/D87t2dyjZg

— Bugman Hegel (@FedPoasting) November 5, 2026

After Deeply Unpleasant Campaign Season, Dems Promise To Soothe Economically Anxious Americans With Screeching Lawfare Jihad https://t.co/hTtnZRWgRi

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) November 6, 2026

BREAKING: The DOJ appears just filed to voluntarily dismiss its voter fraud case against California. A Nov. 13 hearing was set to scrutinize the list of 20,000 suspected noncitizens. https://t.co/XgdkueJnSm

— Sara Libby (@SaraLibby) November 7, 2026

We dismissed the case because the court rejected our demands to sequester the ballots, and the election is now over. Our efforts to restore confidence and integrity in elections continue. We will pursue every civil and criminal remedy to ensure only eligible American citizens… https://t.co/EltpiBjyPd

— F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli) November 7, 2026

NEW: Judge Reyes intends to appoint Jessie K. Liu—former US Attorney for the District of Columbia during the first Trump administration—to serve as special master to investigate whether DOJ or Department of Interior counsel have committed ethical violations in the golf course… pic.twitter.com/VNu1ALpS5q

— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) November 7, 2026

Huge win for President Trump. Can President Trump build the wall in Texas? Congress gave the President authority to build to stop illegal crossings. President Trump is "exceedingly likely" to succeed on the merits. Stay granted over only Justice Jackson noting dissent. 8-1 pic.twitter.com/eFajGa8Vhy

— Eric W. (@EWess92) November 9, 2026

Quote:

---

In an unsigned, five-page opinion, the justices explained that while the major questions doctrine certainly reflects constitutional concerns, it's still a tool courts use to interpret statutes.
And the Court didn't mince words:

Quote:

---

There is no such thing as a "constitutional" major-questions claim.

---

In other words, arguing that an agency exceeded the authority Congress granted it doesn't magically become a constitutional claim simply because the underlying legal principle has constitutional roots.
Call it what you like. It's still a statutory challenge.

Moreover, Congress expressly barred the lower courts from entertaining those challenges to the secretary's waiver decisions. Thus, the Court concluded that the administration was exceedingly likely to prevail on its argument that the district court lacked jurisdiction.

The justices also noted that the injunction was costing the government nearly $500,000 per day in unrecoverable expenses, according to a Customs and Border Protection official, and interfering with Congress's expressly stated preference for expedited border construction.

---

NEW: In a 2-1 vote, the Ninth Circuit lifted court-ordered limits on federal agents' use of tear gas and other crowd-control weapons at protests outside a Portland ICE facility, along with a requirement that agents wear more visible identifying markings on their uniforms. pic.twitter.com/AtzbHZEqvl

— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) November 10, 2026

🚨JUST IN🚨

The White House has sent a warning letter to incoming House Oversight Committee chair Rep. Robert Garcia warning that some of the new Democratic majority’s investigations could cross into criminal behavior.

The letter, penned by WH counsel Will Scharf, seems to be… pic.twitter.com/VPzN7elsja

— Breanna Morello (@BreannaMorello) November 11, 2026

The consequences of the Trump I SCOTUS appointments are vividly on display today as the libertarian-conservative Justices in the majority (save Justice Alito) seem inclined to limit immigration enforcement adjudication by federal agencies. Ironies abound, such as Justice… https://t.co/lTmPtgD3hL

— Adrian Vermeule (@Vermeullarmine) November 11, 2026

Howdy. Fellow Aggie here. I can tell you who is behind all of the lawfare and what it is about. It will help with your investigation. @AGToddBlanche should know who is behind it as he was Trump’s attorney while the same individual, Norm Eisen, tried to put Trump in prison and… https://t.co/dWQ4MfLLm8

— The Researcher (@listen_2learn) November 12, 2026

Quote:

---

Howdy. Fellow Aggie here. I can tell you who is behind all of the lawfare and what it is about. It will help with your investigation.

@AGToddBlanche should know who is behind it as he was Trump's attorney while the same individual, Norm Eisen, tried to put Trump in prison and bankrupt him during the four years of the Biden administration as part of interfering in the 2024 election, which is one of the main reasons for the upcoming two years of lawfare.

This all could have been avoided had Norm Eisen been held accountable, including for spending millions of taxpayer dollars to interfere in the 2020 election along with Adam Schiff, Eric Ciaramella, Jerry Nadler, and many others.

You also need to investigate the nonprofit industrial complex. They are actually who runs the Democratic Party lawfare operation, including Democracy Defenders (Norm's group), Protect Democracy (who should be under investigation since they are the main coordinating body for the entire resistance operation), and Democracy Forward (which is run by Marc Elias and fascist Skye Perriman).

I am happy to help you. Gig'em!

---