***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

331,798 Views | 3132 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by nortex97
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Troy91 • 7:12a, 1/13/26
He will continue to double down. No one will stop him. He is not a judge, he is a radical leftist activist.
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:31p, 1/13/26

Reply Quote
1
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 3:04p, 1/13/26
AG
These judges deserve no respectful language as they through all that out the window when they initiated political lawfare from the bench.

Heck, I think I would be using much worse language. These judges are not officers of the court. Their treasonous *******s deserving of quality time in an IRGC prison.
Reply Quote
8
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:28a, 1/14/26
AG
Trump ends TPS for Somalis (without consulting any Obama judges).

I almost don't think I need to add that I voted for this.
Reply Quote
18
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 11:41a, 1/14/26
AG
Well, it was temporary.

The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
5
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 11:43a, 1/14/26
Quote:
jeremiad

Appears Mr. Klasfeld got a word-a-day calendar for Christmas!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
2
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 11:44a, 1/14/26
AG
nortex97 said:
Trump ends TPS for Somalis (without consulting any Obama judges).

I almost don't think I need to add that I voted for this.

Has always puzzled me how people admitted under temporary asylum status can ever become US citizens without first leaving and then applying to come back legally.
Reply Quote
8
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:03p, 1/14/26
This could be pretty HUGE!

Reply Quote
10
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:57p, 1/14/26
What the?



I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 4:00p, 1/14/26
Im Gipper said:
What the?



TACO
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
1
Mathguy64
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 4:01p, 1/14/26
AG
They either were told they were losing and didnt want to set precedent, or are afraid they are going to lose and didnt want to set precedent.

IMHO that shouldnt be an option. You put your money on the table to appeal, you cant take it back.
Reply Quote
2
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mathguy64 • 4:36p, 1/14/26
AG
Mathguy64 said:
They either were told they were losing and didnt want to set precedent, or are afraid they are going to lose and didnt want to set precedent.

IMHO that shouldnt be an option. You put your money on the table to appeal, you cant take it back.

How is it possible that congress doesn't have the authority to cut funding that was originally authorized by congress? That makes zero sense on any level.
Reply Quote
7
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 11:20p, 1/14/26
AG
txags92 said:
Mathguy64 said:
They either were told they were losing and didnt want to set precedent, or are afraid they are going to lose and didnt want to set precedent.

IMHO that shouldnt be an option. You put your money on the table to appeal, you cant take it back.

How is it possible that congress doesn't have the authority to cut funding that was originally authorized by congress? That makes zero sense on any level.

Duh.

Orange Man Bad.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:48a, 1/15/26
Reply Quote
2
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:42a, 1/15/26
AG
Another reversal on appeal.

https://apnews.com/article/mahmoud-khalil-protester-immigration-appeals-court-deportation-2b6d321d5157632412a82fba14eb3bd4
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
4
We fixed the keg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 9:52a, 1/15/26
AG
techno-ag said:
Another reversal on appeal.

https://apnews.com/article/mahmoud-khalil-protester-immigration-appeals-court-deportation-2b6d321d5157632412a82fba14eb3bd4

When I saw this case, the first thing that came to mind was me as a kid asking my grandmother if I could do something because I knew she would say 'yes' and the folks would say 'no.'

Going to ask a friendly district court and not a federal appeals court cause they will say 'yes.'
Reply Quote
3
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:52a, 1/15/26
Biden judge of course.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
5
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 9:54a, 1/15/26
AG
Quote:
How is it possible that congress doesn't have the authority to cut funding that was originally authorized by congress? That makes zero sense on any level.

Particularly under the principle that one session of Congress cannot forever thereafter bind future sessions. And that should be due to very obvious reasons.

Congress legislates. It can amend or repeal what they have legislated in the past. Else a constitutional amendment would be required to restrict a future session from repealing or amending any specific legislation.
Reply Quote
5
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:20p, 1/15/26
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Reply Quote
5
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Dirty_Mike&the_boys • 3:08p, 1/15/26
AG
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:


https://www.fox9.com/news/minnesota-ice-surge-lawsuit-judge-allows-ice-continue-operation-jan-14-2026

The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
4
TRM
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 6:20p, 1/15/26
AG
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:23p, 1/15/26
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:29p, 1/15/26
Reply Quote
6
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:31p, 1/15/26
That judge is a piece of **** who wants rigged elections.
Reply Quote
10
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 9:42p, 1/15/26
AG
techno-ag said:
Another reversal on appeal.

https://apnews.com/article/mahmoud-khalil-protester-immigration-appeals-court-deportation-2b6d321d5157632412a82fba14eb3bd4

You DO have to love the COMPLETELY UNBIASED headline for the story, though...

Quote:
Court ruling jeopardizes freedom for pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil

You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
6
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 6:59a, 1/16/26
AG
Yet another one.
Reply Quote
7
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 7:05a, 1/16/26
Oregon, sorry for ya. Your votes will no longer be counted for federal elections. Good day.
Reply Quote
12
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:14a, 1/16/26
Most secure elections....

Can't dispute elections as judges say NO ONE has standing.
Can't get states to purge election rolls.
Can't audit elections because states won't allow it, and judges won't allow it.
Don't have to have ID to vote. Just show up, and someone can vouch for you!
States let illegals vote in local elections, but somehow keep illegals from voting in national election.
Millions of ballots mailed around the US/Worldwide but states refuse to match signatures, or even ensure ballots have all correct information filled out.
Ballot received 2389472934871 days after Election day are counted.
Dominion machines seemingly easily hackable.
Dominion ballots counted using QR code no human can read.

Sure I am missing tons of other things that make our elections less than "MOST SECURE".
Reply Quote
12
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:15a, 1/16/26
And if you question any of it, YOU are disenfranchising voters they refuse to prove even exist.
Reply Quote
10
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:45a, 1/16/26
Reply Quote
6
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 10:52a, 1/16/26
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
And if you question any of it, YOU are disenfranchising voters they refuse to prove even exist.


The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
7
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:14p, 1/16/26
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:18p, 1/16/26
AG
will25u said:

Hmm. Guess Congress should have thought a bit more about that FISA crap, hmm?
Reply Quote
4
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:19p, 1/16/26
will25u said:

That'll be an interesting one.

I would not be surprised if they say blanket warrants are prohibited, but if law enforcement has a warrant for a specific phone(s), that would be okay.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:33a, 1/17/26
AG
Immigration judges are fed up with Article 3 judges making ridiculous politically-driven rulings…but this is one I'd predict the ACLU unfortunately will win on.
Quote:
BOSTON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The top U.S. immigration judge has told her colleagues that they are not bound by a federal court ruling that declared the Trump administration cannot place thousands of people in mandatory detention without an opportunity to be released on bond.

That directive came in an email Chief Immigration Judge Teresa Riley sent her colleagues on Tuesday that the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts attached to a filing on Friday in Boston federal court in a lawsuit challenging the administration's policy of denying bond hearings.

The ACLU said the email was evidence that "the government has deliberately and systematically instructed every Immigration Judge in the country not to comply with final declaratory judgments."

The civil rights group said the statement directs judges to disregard court rulings by U.S. District Judge Sunshine Sykes in Riverside, California, and U.S. District Judge Patti Saris in Boston in separate class action lawsuits brought on behalf of people who were already living in the United States when they were detained. Both judges held that denying people bond hearings was unlawful.

Quote:
But Sykes, whose case is a nationwide class action, in a ruling in December said that the administration's interpretation was contrary to law and that, as a result, the board's ruling was "no longer controlling."
Yet Riley in Tuesday's email told her colleagues that because Sykes did not issue an injunction, the board's decision "remains binding precedent on agency adjudicators."

Lawyers with the ACLU said that prior to that email, the immigration court in Massachusetts had begun holding bond hearings again, consistent with Saris' decision.

Yet the lawyers said they received multiple reports on Thursday that an immigration judge was denying detainee requests for bond hearings.

Reply Quote
3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.