Idiots at The Hill: Congress can still stop Trump from assuming office

5,545 Views | 47 Replies | Last: 13 hrs ago by MarkTwain
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


When their girl loses for being a totally inept mentally challenged drunk mongoloid, it's ok to prevent the winner of the election from assuming office.
OdessaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Threat to democracy, eh?
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Their tears will be delicious when Trump is sworn in.
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would advise them not to attempt any obstruction. That would be very bad.
Esteban du Plantier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
'block' 'act now'

Sounds like inciting insurrection, no?
.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
on a personal note i just hope the liz cheney's of the world get their justice.
Al Bula
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The intersection of sensationalism and insurrection. What a time to be alive!
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
45-70Ag said:



When their girl loses for being a totally inept mentally challenged drunk mongoloid, it's ok to prevent the winner of the election from assuming office.

Yeah, no. That isn't going to happen.
Trump will fix it.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Q turned blue
flyrancher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Hill is inciting an insurrection? Who would have thunk?
flyrancher
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Random aside. English is a funny language.

Yeah, no- means no.
No, yeah- means yeah
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dare I say insurrection...
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blueAnon may be even more ******ed than QAnon

how many times now have they "got him!" and then nothing happened.
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Hill is still living in pre-2024, thinking that the majority of the country is opposed to Trump being President.

They're like Homer Stokes at the end of O Brother Where Art Thou. Completely obtuse and unable to read the room and accept reality.

This isn't 2017, The Hill. It's not even 2023. The crap the left and the deep state got away with before will no longer fly.

It's morning in America again.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
14th amendment crap again. So stupid.

But here is a scenario that I fear is more probable and it involves Mike Johnson. he did himself no favors with that budget debacle last week. Jefferies has already said the Dems won't come to his rescue for retaining SOH if some Republicans defect on Jan 3rd. No Speaker three days later on Jan 6th? No certification.

No Speaker after 14 more days to January 20th? Biden is gone, Kamala is gone, Trump can't be inaugurated without certification, still no Speaker, so who becomes acting President? Chuck Grassley as President Pro Tempore.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OdessaAg said:

Threat to democracy, eh?


Situational ethics always apply with the left.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ts5641 said:

Dare I say insurrection...
Agreed. Seeing that the authors are advocating for overturning an election in favor of a power grab on the flimsiest grounds imaginable, I would argue that they themselves are "inciting insurrection against the Constitution".

A couple of years of incarceration should be in order for them to rethink their actions.

That's how it works, doesn't it?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Hill woke up and chose violence today. They lean left but do a decent job of covering legislative news. Why throw away that reputation by publishing the Blue-Anon stuff publicly?
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Evan Davis (article author) should be in in federal prison with no trial date set. I believe that's how it works with insurrectionists.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:

Random aside. English is a funny language.

Yeah, no- means no.
No, yeah- means yeah


Quote:

An MIT linguistics professor was lecturing his class the other day. "In English," he said, "a double negative forms a positive. However, in some languages, such as Russian, a double negative remains a negative. But there isn't a single language, not one, in which a double positive can express a negative."


A voice from the back of the room piped up, "Yeah, right."
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like an insurrection to me.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One of the authors is from Cornell Law and the other from Yale Law. Why does that not surprise me.


And The Hill has the 'this is the opinion of the author and not ours' message a little bigger than usual.
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The arguments are incredibly laughable.

Trump can be disqualified under the 14th Amendment because:

1) A majority of the Senate, but not 2/3, voted to convict which means Trump is guilty of insurrection. Similar to a jury having a majority to convict in a jurisdiction where a unanimous verdict is required would make someone guilty. Oh and Trump had counsel for that.

2) In the Colorado hearing he was found to be guilty of insurrection in their attempt to throw him off the ballot that was then overturned by the Supreme Court. So if a court is overturned you're still guilty. Trump also had counsel.

3) The J6 inquiry found he was responsible for an insurrection. Trump didn't have counsel. It was bipartisan of course. Any mention of members of the committee being referred for investigation or prosecution for destroying evidence, witness tampering or suborning perjury? Yeah not mentioned.

So that means Congress can vote to ignore Trump electors.

This wouldn't pass muster in a pre-law class let alone a moot court. What an embarrassing argument to attach your name to having graduated from any law school let alone some prestigious ones. It's as shallow and intellectually as lazy an argument as you will ever see. I'd expect better from a 1st semester 1L.
flakrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flyrancher said:

The Hill is inciting an insurrection? Who would have thunk?
Send them to the DC Gulag!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

This wouldn't pass muster in a pre-law class let alone a moot court. What an embarrassing argument to attach your name to having graduated from any law school let alone some prestigious ones. It's as shallow and intellectually as lazy an argument as you will ever see. I'd expect better from a 1st semester 1L.
Yet, John Eastman made a logical argument regarding alternate slates of electors to comply with the Safe Harbor provisions in 2020 and has been disbarred over that. Eastman's proposition certainly had more historical and legit legal analysis than The Hill's bag of crap arguments.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They are not just graduates. They are employees

Even worse.


So laughable.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

14th amendment crap again. So stupid.

But here is a scenario that I fear is more probable and it involves Mike Johnson. he did himself no favors with that budget debacle last week. Jefferies has already said the Dems won't come to his rescue for retaining SOH if some Republicans defect on Jan 3rd. No Speaker three days later on Jan 6th? No certification.

No Speaker after 14 more days to January 20th? Biden is gone, Kamala is gone, Trump can't be inaugurated without certification, still no Speaker, so who becomes acting President? Chuck Grassley as President Pro Tempore.
So they want an insurrection to what prosecute an insurrection? Yeah that's good for our democracy. The people have spoken, the insurrectionist should shut up.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
....To save our democracy
Ags4DaWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds like insurrection to me.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Insurrection!!!
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This all seems pretty insurrectiony to me.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Insurrection ? I guess the left wants a civil war because a stunt like disenfranchising 70 million votes is EXACTLY how you'd get a civil war.

Idiots.
stetson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just a couple of dudes putting their wet dream down on paper and nothing more.
FJB
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.