New Jersey Drones

60,156 Views | 521 Replies | Last: 10 hrs ago by Stat Monitor Repairman
Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When did they start? Is it possible they are flying over critical infrastructure stuff? Refineries, sin stations?
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Another explanation I saw was the Navy doing drone testing from ship to land.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brothels and strip clubs are critical infrastructure?
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yukon Cornelius said:

When did they start? Is it possible they are flying over critical infrastructure stuff? Refineries, sin stations?


First time I saw was a couple nights ago. Didn't see anything last night but wasn't looking very much either. Then seeing again tonight. Another person out here, while I wasn't here, a week ago said he definitely saw a drone but it was large, like vehicle size, and was close enough he could guess the road/canyon it was over.
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kenneth_2003 said:

Brothels and strip clubs are critical infrastructure?
I think that depends on how long someone has been without.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Lisa (the person who called 911) needs to lay off the booze.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've done some drunk dialing in my day, but never to 9-1-1 about drones stealing our lectricity.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flakrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:


titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
General Jack D. Ripper said:

Hear me out. These drones are only a tiny proportion of how many there actually are. And while each of those drones has armament capabilities they also each have smaller drones and each of those drones hold razor sharp flechettes.

In all non conspiracy theorist mindset, if Trump, Vivek, Elon and RFK do what they promised and what they were elected to do, people are going to prison and people are going to be bankrupted. These folks are or are related to people deep in the Washington bureaucracy.

You don't think they could be capable of running a coup to keep their game going and to stay out of prison?

Considering the vote and at least general if not large mandate for being rid of the present course, I really don't think any such 11th hour attempt to hang onto power would happen or succeed. Nor would an MSM spin to justify Bidenites holding power work. The public would probably and rightly burn it all down over it and drive all of them out of the Beltway.

Given how generally ineffectual our justice system is, I think they would be overestimating any risk of suffering too much. There are already GOP Rinos generating static. No broad legal consequences are likely to unfold.

Nah --- these drone sightings, the real ones among them, represent something else. Its unsure what, but its hard to believe the military would be acting so impotent if they were not ours. Even if one believes the WH gang itself are borderline traitors. No...something else to all this. But what.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not keeping up with this in detail but this guy seems fairly credible in his analysis that these things are likely looking for gas/radiological material (basically sniffing). Pretty scary when you consider Sarah Adams comments, imho, but who knows.

B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:

Rapier108 said:

Charlie Kirk should know better than spreading stupid **** from Reddit.

And there is no way to have "secret" satellite launches. They are easily visible to millions and when one is launched, there are numerous safety protocols that have to be followed to keep the airspace clear. Those notices are public and easily accessible.
That's crazy. Is he implying they are some kind of cloaking device test? "balls turn into planes when filmed."

Still don't believe this is a foreign power. Even Milley's era Pentagon probably would act against it if so.
Putting those captured aliens to work out at Area 51!
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Not keeping up with this in detail but this guy seems fairly credible in his analysis that these things are likely looking for gas/radiological material (basically sniffing). Pretty scary when you consider Sarah Adams comments, imho, but who knows.


I can't believe this theory was floated in the first place. There's an obvious problem that shoots it down immediately (pun intended, dammit.) A nuclear device detonation, dirty or not, would be a catastrophic world changing event. If drones can be used to search for this rumored WMD, then why aren't these "nuclear sniffing drones" flying around the clock 24/7 instead of only a few hours at night? Is maintaining secrecy over a military drone program more important than preventing terrorists from setting off a nuclear device anywhere, especially on American soil? It's a dumb theory.
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I haven't read the entire thread, but obviously this is SkyNet using a psyop to freak people out while they build up their forces and prepare to overthrow mankind.
Independence H-D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
G Martin 87 said:

nortex97 said:

Not keeping up with this in detail but this guy seems fairly credible in his analysis that these things are likely looking for gas/radiological material (basically sniffing). Pretty scary when you consider Sarah Adams comments, imho, but who knows.


I can't believe this theory was floated in the first place. There's an obvious problem that shoots it down immediately (pun intended, dammit.) A nuclear device detonation, dirty or not, would be a catastrophic world changing event. If drones can be used to search for this rumored WMD, then why aren't these "nuclear sniffing drones" flying around the clock 24/7 instead of only a few hours at night? Is maintaining secrecy over a military drone program more important than preventing terrorists from setting off a nuclear device anywhere, especially on American soil? It's a dumb theory.


My thought is that it could be an exercise for such an event. Doing a little prep before the big show.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Unless there is intelligence that the/some movement is expected to be happening at specific times/locations. 'They' can't station a drone over that bridge 24/7 I'd think.

As Sarah Adams stated on her recent discussion/podcast, they know our weaknesses, and adapting to that if we have intelligence makes sense to me. She also said bridges/infrastructure also matter as targets. I don't mean to be optimistic about our Intel. folks knowing what is really being planned/executed, but to me the hope is that they are at least working to interdict the next domestic strike(s) (knowing over 1,000 ISIS/Al Qaeda folks are embedded here).





I don't think it's a stupid theory at all, but it could be wrong, as he states.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:


Lisa (the person who called 911) needs to lay off the booze.

We'll never convince people to drive Teslas if drones keep sucking power away.
Trump will fix it.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nuclear material doesn't stop emitting radiation in the daytime, or when it isn't in the presence of a bridge.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
G Martin 87 said:

nortex97 said:

Not keeping up with this in detail but this guy seems fairly credible in his analysis that these things are likely looking for gas/radiological material (basically sniffing). Pretty scary when you consider Sarah Adams comments, imho, but who knows.


I can't believe this theory was floated in the first place. There's an obvious problem that shoots it down immediately (pun intended, dammit.) A nuclear device detonation, dirty or not, would be a catastrophic world changing event. If drones can be used to search for this rumored WMD, then why aren't these "nuclear sniffing drones" flying around the clock 24/7 instead of only a few hours at night? Is maintaining secrecy over a military drone program more important than preventing terrorists from setting off a nuclear device anywhere, especially on American soil? It's a dumb theory.
Since there is so little information, people have to make up stuff.

The more outrageous and scary it sounds, the more they know many will eat it up.

This nuke theory keeps getting rearranged when people point out the BS parts of it. The earlier version said the drones were being used in conjunction with the WC-135 Constant Phoenix aircraft. The problem with that, and the current one, is that "sniffing" for a nuke will not find an undetonated weapon. What it looks for is the radioactive fallout a detonation creates.

Truly, some of these people on social media really act like they want a nuke to go off, or for Al-Qaeda to slaughter tens of thousands of Americans just so they can get on their platform of choice and scream "see, see, see, I was right!" Social media is a cancer on society.

And because I know all my posts get flagged, the paragraph above is in reference to people on Twitter, Tik-Tok, etc. putting out all of the zero evidence fear porn. It is not referring to anyone on TA.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NGET's on a drone to detect fissile material are not a 'conspiracy theory' at all. And again, if actionable intelligence gives credence to a threat movement at a given time of day it would be logical to deploy to detect this stuff in transit if possible.

People confident they know everything about this stuff or what is going on exactly are the ones who are fools on social media, imho. I didn't even read anything about WC-135's which would be pretty useless, yes. But I admit I haven't followed this stuff much. I should have known better than to post an informed opinion (the guy in Wichita) about military-grade drones here.

Apologies all.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
G Martin 87 said:

Nuclear material doesn't stop emitting radiation in the daytime, or when it isn't in the presence of a bridge.
If one wants to monitor a bridge, all they have to do is put a radiation detector on it.

Same thing that is used in ports to check incoming containers.

A drone would actually be an inefficient way to do it.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not a nuclear physicist, nor do I play one on the Internet.

But I'm fairly sure that radiation drops off at the square of the distance from the emitter. So the drones need to be as low as possible to have a prayer of sensing radiation.

I'm thinking ground level or rooftop level at the highest.
akaggie05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There has definitely been an uptick in background radiation survey activity lately, including publicized purchases of new equipment. This helicopter was doing low-level passes over DC a few weeks ago, for example. Would not be a stretch to think that they are also testing an unmanned, more distributed capability in parallel.

https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/articles/nnsa-gets-new-helicopters-support-radiological-security-across-nation
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aliens are self deporting before Jan 20.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Rapier108 said:

G Martin 87 said:

nortex97 said:

Not keeping up with this in detail but this guy seems fairly credible in his analysis that these things are likely looking for gas/radiological material (basically sniffing). Pretty scary when you consider Sarah Adams comments, imho, but who knows.


I can't believe this theory was floated in the first place. There's an obvious problem that shoots it down immediately (pun intended, dammit.) A nuclear device detonation, dirty or not, would be a catastrophic world changing event. If drones can be used to search for this rumored WMD, then why aren't these "nuclear sniffing drones" flying around the clock 24/7 instead of only a few hours at night? Is maintaining secrecy over a military drone program more important than preventing terrorists from setting off a nuclear device anywhere, especially on American soil? It's a dumb theory.
Since there is so little information, people have to make up stuff.

The more outrageous and scary it sounds, the more they know many will eat it up.

This nuke theory keeps getting rearranged when people point out the BS parts of it. The earlier version said the drones were being used in conjunction with the WC-135 Constant Phoenix aircraft. The problem with that, and the current one, is that "sniffing" for a nuke will not find an undetonated weapon. What it looks for is the radioactive fallout a detonation creates.

Truly, some of these people on social media really act like they want a nuke to go off, or for Al-Qaeda to slaughter tens of thousands of Americans just so they can get on their platform of choice and scream "see, see, see, I was right!" Social media is a cancer on society.

And because I know all my posts get flagged, the paragraph above is in reference to people on Twitter, Tik-Tok, etc. putting out all of the zero evidence fear porn. It is not referring to anyone on TA.
Though I am aware somewhat of the weary feud between on some Trump vs DesSantis matters, on anything else why would your posts get flagged. They have always appeared pretty informative and giving another perspective. These on the unsettling nuke rumor are particularly refreshing just now and almost act as "rumor control" which is good.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Saw a time lapse video, supposedly from NJ, and it looks a lot like what I've seen. The lights appear and streak but then fade away. Reminds me of meteors but they are going different directions, not falling. Most all of the lights are low on the horizon and roughly same area. I'd guess originating within 30 degrees of each other. I doubt that the time-lapse matches up to what I've seen since it can be as long as 30 mins in between, sometimes much closer though with two at the same time (saw two last night again but they were staggered and going same direction, same speed)
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can you post the video?
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

Can you post the video?


It was on the hated tiktok and I don't think I can embed that.

Username: trendy_viewz Nuke
Animal Eight 84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CanyonAg77 said:

I'm not a nuclear physicist, nor do I play one on the Internet.

But I'm fairly sure that radiation drops off at the square of the distance from the emitter. So the drones need to be as low as possible to have a prayer of sensing radiation.

I'm thinking ground level or rooftop level at the highest.
NEST has been using scintillation detectors on helicopters for over 40 years to find radioactive material.

They can find lost oilfield sources, etc.

Also chemical sniffer technologies have significantly advanced since the 1970s, used to work at a place that had automatic ventilation shutdown & isolation when certain industrial chemicals were detected.


Maybe it's a training drill.
It's no secret NEST routinely monitors large public events like the Super Bowl, Political Conventions, etc.

Kwade23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TAMUallen said:

redline248 said:

Can you post the video?


It was on the hated tiktok and I don't think I can embed that.

Username: trendy_viewz Nuke
https://www.tiktok.com/@trendy_viewz/video/7448824152825318687?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=mobile&sender_web_id=7441735427806119466
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

G Martin 87 said:

Nuclear material doesn't stop emitting radiation in the daytime, or when it isn't in the presence of a bridge.
If one wants to monitor a bridge, all they have to do is put a radiation detector on it.

Same thing that is used in ports to check incoming containers.

Or at landfills.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wish someone would shoot some of them down and then we can ground check the things.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We tried to scrap an old piece of farm equipment and got rejected at the scrapyard because of radiation. Only thing we could figure was that it was made of pipe that came out of the oil field. We guess maybe a radioactive source used in well logging or similar was the problem
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Rosanne Barr: it's blue beam.
Quote:

Roseanne Barr, among many others, attributed citizens' confusion and the lack of information being provided about the staggering number of drones in the sky to something called Project Blue Beam.

'Now you see why I mention Project Blue Beam every week on my podcast…..,' the 72-year-old Trump-supporting actress wrote on X.

Project Blue Beam is a conspiracy theory dating to the 1990s that claims global elites, including government and military organizations, are planning to use advanced technology to stage celestial events in order to manipulate the world's population.

The theory has recently found traction again online as commentators such as Barr claim that the US government could stage an alien invasion as a pretext for imposing authoritarian rule.

The outlandish theory is among many that have been amplified over the last week in the vacuum of information left in the wake of the Biden administration's failure to tell the public where the drones are coming from or who is behind them.
Note: I posted above for a morning chuckle, before anyone gets their panties in a wad.
redsquirrelAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Staging for the phyops of a drone attack before inauguration.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.